Search Legislation

Courts-Martial (Appeals) Act 1968

 Help about what version

What Version

 Help about opening options

Opening OptionsExpand opening options

Status:

This is the original version (as it was originally enacted).

Disposal of appeal

12Power to quash conviction as wrong in law, etc.

(1)The Appeal Court shall allow an appeal against conviction by court-martial if they think—

(a)that the finding of the court-martial under all the circumstances of the case is unsafe or unsatisfactory; or

(b)that the finding involves a wrong decision of a question of law; or

(c)that there was a material irregularity in the course of the trial,

and in any other case shall dismiss the appeal:

Provided that the Court may, notwithstanding that they are of the opinion that the point raised in the appeal might be decided in favour of the appellant, dismiss the appeal if they consider that no miscarriage of justice has actually occurred.

(2)If the Appeal Court allow an appeal against conviction, they shall quash the conviction.

13Adjustment of sentence in case of conviction on two or more charges

Where—

(a)it appears to the Appeal Court that an appellant, though not properly convicted on some charge preferred against him before the court-martial by which he was tried, was properly convicted on some other charge so preferred; and

(b)the sentence passed by the court-martial on the appellant was not warranted by the relevant Service Act for the offence of which he was convicted on the other charge,

the Court shall pass on the appellant, in substitution for the sentence passed on him by the court-martial, such sentence so warranted as they think proper.

14Substitution of conviction on different charge

(1)This section applies where an appellant has been convicted of an offence and the court-martial by which he was tried could lawfully have found him guilty of some other offence, and it appears to the Appeal Court that the court-martial must have been satisfied of facts which proved him guilty of that other offence.

(2)The Appeal Court may, instead of allowing or dismissing the appeal, substitute for the finding of the court-martial a finding of guilty of the other offence, and may pass on the appellant, in substitution for the sentence passed on him by the court-martial, such sentence as they think proper, being a sentence warranted by the relevant Service Act for that other offence, but not a sentence of greater severity.

15Variation of conviction so as to attract different sentence

(1)Where an appellant has been convicted of an offence committed under circumstances involving the higher of two degrees of punishment, and it appears to the Appeal Court that the court-martial by which he was tried ought to have found him guilty of the offence as being committed under circumstances involving the lower degree of punishment, the Court may, instead of allowing or dismissing the appeal, substitute for the finding of the court-martial a finding of guilty of the offence as being committed under circumstances involving the lower degree of punishment.

(2)Where an appellant has been convicted of an offence and it appears to the Appeal Court that the court-martial by which he was tried ought to have found him guilty of the offence subject to exceptions or variations, the Court may, instead of allowing or dismissing the appeal, substitute for the finding of the court-martial a finding of guilty of the offence subject to exceptions or variations.

(3)Where the Appeal Court exercise the power conferred by subsection (1) or subsection (2) above, they may pass on the appellant, in substitution for the sentence passed on him by the court-martial, such sentence as they think proper, being a sentence warranted by the relevant Service Act for the offence specified or involved in the substituted finding, but not a sentence of greater severity.

16Substitution of finding of insanity or unfitness to plead

(1)This section applies in a case where, on an appeal, the Appeal Court are of opinion—

(a)that the proper finding would have been a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity ; or

(b)that the case is not one where there should have been a finding of not guilty, but that there should have been a finding that the accused was unfit to stand his trial.

(2)The Appeal Court shall order the appellant to be kept in custody under the relevant Service enactment in like manner as on a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity or a finding of unfitness to stand trial by the court-martial by which the appellant was convicted.

(3)In subsection (2) above, the " relevant Service enactment" means—

  • section 63 of the Naval Discipline Act;

  • section 116 of the Army Act; or

  • section 116 of the Air Force Act,

(being enactments which provide for a person to be kept in custody until the pleasure of Her Majesty is made known), according to whether the appellant was convicted by a naval, army or air force court-martial.

17Term of sentence passed under s. 13, 14 or 15

(1)The term of any sentence passed by the Appeal Court under section 13, 14 or 15 of this Act shall, unless the Court otherwise direct, begin to run from the time from which it would have begun to run if it had been passed in the proceedings from which the appeal was brought.

(2)A sentence passed by the Appeal Court under any of those sections shall—

(a)if passed on an appeal against conviction by a naval court-martial, be deemed, for purposes of the Naval Discipline Act, to be a sentence passed by such a court-martial; and

(b)if passed on an appeal against conviction by an army or air force court-martial, be deemed for purposes of the Army Act or the Air Force Act, as the case may be, to be a sentence passed by an army, or as the case may be, an air force court-martial, being a sentence that has been confirmed.

Back to top

Options/Help