Print Options
PrintThe Whole
Act
PrintThe Whole
Part
PrintThe Whole
Cross Heading
PrintThis
Section
only
Changes over time for: Section 9
Timeline of Changes
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
No versions valid at: 28/07/2000
Status:
Point in time view as at 28/07/2000. This version of this provision is not valid for this point in time.
Status
Not valid for this point in time generally means that a provision was not in force for the point in time you have selected to view it on.
Changes to legislation:
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Postal Services Act 2000, Section 9.
Changes to Legislation
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
Valid from 26/03/2001
9 General power to suspend the restriction.U.K.
This section has no associated Explanatory Notes
(1)The Secretary of State may by order suspend the operation of section 6.
(2)No such order shall be made except on the recommendation of the Commission.
(3)Where the Commission makes a recommendation to make an order under this section but the Secretary of State decides not to make such an order, the Secretary of State shall lay before each House of Parliament a report containing the reasons for his decision.
Back to top