Print Options
PrintThe Whole
Instrument
PrintThe Whole
Schedule
PrintThe Whole
Part
PrintThis
Section
only
Changes over time for: Paragraph 10
Timeline of Changes
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Version Superseded: 22/11/2010
Status:
Point in time view as at 26/10/2005.
Changes to legislation:
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the The Cereal Seed (England) Regulations 2002 (revoked), Paragraph 10.
Changes to Legislation
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
10.—(1) Subject to sub-paragraphs (3) and (4), in the case of barley, durum wheat, spelt wheat and wheat, the maximum percentage by number of loose smut infection shall be as follows—U.K.
Category | Minimum standard (maximum percentage by number) | Higher Voluntary Standard (maximum percentage by number) |
---|
(a)Basic seed | 0.5 | 0.1 |
(b)C1 seed | 0.5 | 0.2 |
(c)C2 seed | 0.5 | 0.2 |
(2) For the purposes of sub-paragraph (1), the incidence of loose smut infection of seed shall be examined mainly in field inspections carried out in accordance with the conditions laid down in paragraph 15 of Schedule 3.
(3) The provisions of sub-paragraph (1) shall not apply to seed which has failed to meet the standards laid down in that sub-paragraph if it has been adequately treated by any product approved by the Secretary of State for the control of loose smut under the Control of Pesticides Regulations 1986().
(4) The provisions of sub-paragraph (1) shall not apply to seed which has failed to meet the standards laid down in that sub-paragraph (1) if an embryo test carried out by an official testing station or a licensed seed testing station on the sample submitted for seed testing shows that the seed meets the relevant standard.
Back to top