Chwilio Deddfwriaeth

Insolvency Act 1986

 Help about what version

Pa Fersiwn

 Help about advanced features

Nodweddion Uwch

 Help about opening options

Dewisiadau AgorExpand opening options

Changes over time for: ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION – SPECIAL CASES

 Help about opening options

No versions valid at: 31/05/2002

Alternative versions:

Status:

Point in time view as at 31/05/2002. This version of this part contains provisions that are not valid for this point in time. Help about Status

Changes to legislation:

Insolvency Act 1986, ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION – SPECIAL CASES is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 09 March 2025. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. Help about Changes to Legislation

Yn ddilys o 15/09/2003

[F1 ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION – SPECIAL CASESE+W+S

Textual Amendments

F1Sch. B1 inserted (15.9.2003) by 2002 c. 40, ss. 248(2), 279, Sch. 16 (with s. 249(1)-(3)(6)); S.I. 2003/2093, art. 2(1), Sch. 1 (subject to arts. 3-8 (as amended by S.I. 2003/2332, art. 2))

Application by holder of floating chargeE+W+S

35(1)This paragraph applies where an administration application in respect of a company—

(a)is made by the holder of a qualifying floating charge in respect of the company’s property, and

(b)includes a statement that the application is made in reliance on this paragraph.

(2)The court may make an administration order—

(a)whether or not satisfied that the company is or is likely to become unable to pay its debts, but

(b)only if satisfied that the applicant could appoint an administrator under paragraph 14.

Intervention by holder of floating chargeE+W+S

36(1)This paragraph applies where—

(a)an administration application in respect of a company is made by a person who is not the holder of a qualifying floating charge in respect of the company’s property, and

(b)the holder of a qualifying floating charge in respect of the company’s property applies to the court to have a specified person appointed as administrator (and not the person specified by the administration applicant).

(2)The court shall grant an application under sub-paragraph (1)(b) unless the court thinks it right to refuse the application because of the particular circumstances of the case.

Application where company in liquidationE+W+S

37(1)This paragraph applies where the holder of a qualifying floating charge in respect of a company’s property could appoint an administrator under paragraph 14 but for paragraph 8(1)(b).

(2)The holder of the qualifying floating charge may make an administration application.

(3)If the court makes an administration order on hearing an application made by virtue of sub-paragraph (2)—

(a)the court shall discharge the winding-up order,

(b)the court shall make provision for such matters as may be prescribed,

(c)the court may make other consequential provision,

(d)the court shall specify which of the powers under this Schedule are to be exercisable by the administrator, and

(e)this Schedule shall have effect with such modifications as the court may specify.

38(1)The liquidator of a company may make an administration application.E+W+S

(2)If the court makes an administration order on hearing an application made by virtue of sub-paragraph (1)—

(a)the court shall discharge any winding-up order in respect of the company,

(b)the court shall make provision for such matters as may be prescribed,

(c)the court may make other consequential provision,

(d)the court shall specify which of the powers under this Schedule are to be exercisable by the administrator, and

(e)this Schedule shall have effect with such modifications as the court may specify.

Effect of administrative receivershipE+W+S

39(1)Where there is an administrative receiver of a company the court must dismiss an administration application in respect of the company unless—

(a)the person by or on behalf of whom the receiver was appointed consents to the making of the administration order,

(b)the court thinks that the security by virtue of which the receiver was appointed would be liable to be released or discharged under sections 238 to 240 (transaction at undervalue and preference) if an administration order were made,

(c)the court thinks that the security by virtue of which the receiver was appointed would be avoided under section 245 (avoidance of floating charge) if an administration order were made, or

(d)the court thinks that the security by virtue of which the receiver was appointed would be challengeable under section 242 (gratuitous alienations) or 243 (unfair preferences) or under any rule of law in Scotland.

(2)Sub-paragraph (1) applies whether the administrative receiver is appointed before or after the making of the administration application.]

Yn ôl i’r brig

Options/Cymorth