
Print Options
PrintThe Whole
Act
PrintThe Whole
Schedule
PrintThe Whole
Cross Heading
PrintThis
Section
only
Changes over time for: Paragraph 87


Llinell Amser Newidiadau
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Status:
Point in time view as at 22/09/2003.
Changes to legislation:
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Road Traffic Act 1991, Paragraph 87.

Changes to Legislation
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
87(1)Section 15 of that Act (use of specimens in proceedings for offences under sections 4 and 5 of the Road Traffic Act 1988) shall be amended as follows.E+W+S
(2)In subsection (1) for the words “section 4 or 5 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (motor vehicles: drink and drugs)” there shall be substituted the words “ section 3A, 4 or 5 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (driving offences connected with drink or drugs) ”, and for the words “sections 4 to 10” there shall be substituted the words “ sections 3A to 10 ”.
(3)In subsection (2) after the word “cases” there shall be inserted the words “ (including cases where the specimen was not provided in connection with the alleged offence) ”.
(4)For subsection (3) there shall be substituted—
“(3)That assumption shall not be made if the accused proves—
(a)that he consumed alcohol before he provided the specimen and—
(i)in relation to an offence under section 3A, after the time of the alleged offence, and
(ii)otherwise, after he had ceased to drive, attempt to drive or be in charge of a vehicle on a road or other public place, and
(b)that had he not done so the proportion of alcohol in his breath, blood or urine would not have exceeded the prescribed limit and, if it is alleged that he was unfit to drive through drink, would not have been such as to impair his ability to drive properly.”
Yn ôl i’r brig