xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
Textual Amendments
F1Sch. 24 repealed (20.1.2003 for E. otherwise prosp.) by Education Act 2002 (c. 32), ss. 215(2), 216, Sch. 22 Pt. 3 (with ss. 210(8), 214(4)); S.I. 2002/2952, art. 2 (with Sch.)
Modifications etc. (not altering text)
C1Sch. 24 modified (temp.) (22.4.1999) by S.I. 1999/1064, reg. 10.
Sch. 24 restricted (29.3.1999) by S.I. 1999/1016, art. 6, Sch. 4 paras. 1, 8
Sch. 24 applied (with modifications) (1.9.1999) by S.I. 1999/2800, reg. 1, Sch. paras. 1, 2-8.
Sch. 24 applied (with modifications) (18.10.1999) by S.I. 1999/2666, reg. 8, Sch. paras. 1(d), 2-8.
Textual Amendments
F2Sch. 24 repealed (20.1.2003 for E. otherwise prosp.) by Education Act 2002 (c. 32), ss. 215(2), 216, Sch. 22 Pt. 3 (with ss. 210(8), 214(4)); S.I. 2002/2952, art. 2 (with Sch.)
12E+W
[F3Where the decision under appeal was made on the ground that prejudice of the kind referred to in section 86(3)(a) would arise as mentioned in subsection (4) of that section, an appeal panel shall determine that a place is to be offered to the child only if they are satisfied—
(a)that the decision was not one which a reasonable admission authority would make in the circumstances of the case; or
(b)that the child would have been offered a place if the admission arrangements (as published under section 92) had been properly implemented.]
Textual Amendments
F3Sch. 24 repealed (20.1.2003 for E. otherwise prosp.) by Education Act 2002 (c. 32), ss. 215(2), 216, Sch. 22 Pt. 3 (with ss. 210(8), 214(4)); S.I. 2002/2952, art. 2 (with Sch.)