Competition Act 1998

24 Effect of a decision that the Chapter II prohibition has not been infringed.U.K.

[F1(1)This section applies to conduct if the [F2OFT] has determined an application under section 22 by making a decision that the conduct has not infringed the Chapter II prohibition.

(2)The [F2OFT] is to take no further action under this Part with respect to the conduct unless—

(a)[F2it] has reasonable grounds for believing that there has been a material change of circumstance since [F2it] gave [F2its] decision; or

(b)[F2it] has a reasonable suspicion that the information on which [F2it] based [F2its] decision was incomplete, false or misleading in a material particular.

(3)No penalty may be imposed under this Part in respect of any infringement of the Chapter II prohibition by conduct to which this section applies.

(4)But the [F2OFT] may remove the immunity given by subsection (3) if—

(a)[F2it] takes action under this Part with respect to the conduct in one of the circumstances mentioned in subsection (2);

(b)[F2it] considers that it is likely that the conduct will infringe the prohibition; and

(c)[F2it] gives notice in writing to the undertaking on whose application the decision was made that [F2it] is removing the immunity as from the date specified in [F2its] notice.

(5)If the [F2OFT] has a reasonable suspicion that information—

(a)on which [F2it] based [F2its] decision, and

(b)which was provided to [F2it] by an undertaking engaging in the conduct,

was incomplete, false or misleading in a material particular, the date specified in a notice under subsection (4)(c) may be earlier than the date on which the notice is given.]

Textual Amendments

F2Words in s. 24 substituted (1.4.2003) by Enterprise Act 2002 (c. 40), s. 279, Sch. 25 para. 38(18); S.I. 2003/766, art. 2, Sch. (with art. 3) (as amended (20.7.2007) by S.I. 2007/1846, reg. 3(2), Sch.)