Chwilio Deddfwriaeth

Communications Act 2003

 Help about what version

Pa Fersiwn

 Help about advanced features

Nodweddion Uwch

 Help about opening options

Dewisiadau AgorExpand opening options

Changes over time for: Cross Heading: When does a landowner or occupier of neighbouring land have the right to require removal of electronic communications apparatus?

 Help about opening options

Version Superseded: 07/02/2023

Alternative versions:

Status:

Point in time view as at 25/10/2019.

Changes to legislation:

Communications Act 2003, Cross Heading: When does a landowner or occupier of neighbouring land have the right to require removal of electronic communications apparatus? is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 08 March 2025. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. Help about Changes to Legislation

[F1When does a landowner or occupier of neighbouring land have the right to require removal of electronic communications apparatus?U.K.

Textual Amendments

F1Sch. 3A inserted (31.7.2017 for the purpose of making regulations under Sch. 3A para. 95, 22.11.2017 but only in relation to Sch. 3A para. 106, 28.12.2017 in so far as not already in force) by Digital Economy Act 2017 (c. 30), s. 118(6), Sch. 1 (with Sch. 2); S.I. 2017/765, reg. 2(ii)(jj); S.I. 2017/1136, reg. 2; S.I. 2017/1286, reg. 2(b)

38(1)A landowner or occupier of any land (“neighbouring land”) has the right to require the removal of electronic communications apparatus kept on, under or over other land in exercise of a right mentioned in paragraph 13(1), if both of the following conditions are met.U.K.

(2)The first condition is that the apparatus interferes with or obstructs a means of access to or from the neighbouring land.

(3)The second condition is that the landowner or occupier of the neighbouring land is not bound by a code right within paragraph 3(h) entitling an operator to cause the interference or obstruction.

(4)A landowner of neighbouring land who is not the occupier of the land does not meet the second condition if—

(a)the land is occupied by a person who—

(i)conferred a code right (which is in force) entitling an operator to cause the interference or obstruction, or

(ii)is otherwise bound by such a right, and

(b)that code right was not conferred in breach of a covenant enforceable by the landowner.

(5)In the application of sub-paragraph (4)(b) to Scotland the reference to a covenant enforceable by the landowner is to be read as a reference to a contractual term which is so enforceable.]

Yn ôl i’r brig

Options/Cymorth