Section 313: Restrictions on relief
1276.This section imposes certain restrictions on the relief that would otherwise be due under section 312. It is based on sections 31A and 31B of ICTA.
1277.Subsection (2) prevents relief when the expenditure is simply part of the build cost of a new property or the purchase price of an acquired one.
1278.Subsection (3) prevents relief in respect of let property that is within Chapter 6 of Part 3 of this Act (commercial letting of furnished holiday accommodation). It makes explicit two aspects that are only implicit in section 31A(11) of ICTA.
1279.The first is that section 31A(11) of ICTA excludes any properties (a) that meet the definition of “commercial letting of furnished holiday accommodation” in section 504 of ICTA and (b) could therefore benefit from the concessions that section 503 of ICTA offers even if they do not, in fact, do so.
1280.The second is that it makes clear the duration of the exclusion. The purpose of the source legislation is to prevent people getting the relief if they are using the property for furnished holiday lettings. A property falls within section 504(4) of ICTA for a year of assessment. Because of the stringency of the conditions in section 504 of ICTA the property can drop in and out of qualifying section 504 of ICTA status from one year to the next. The restriction on relief under these provisions is intended to apply only if the expenditure is incurred in a year of assessment for which the property is within section 504 of ICTA (as described in the previous paragraph) and only for that or those years. So section 313(3) refers specifically to “the tax year”.
1281.Subsection (4) makes it clear that the relief cannot apply when rent-a-room relief is given (see Chapter 1 of Part 7 of this Act). This prohibition does not apply however if neither form of rent-a-room relief is, in fact, taken.
1282.Subsection (5) adapts the general preliminary expenditure deduction rules to the specific circumstances of this relief: the expenditure window is reduced to prevent claims in respect of past expenditure when the dwelling may have been the landlord’s own home and it is later let.
