xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

SCHEDULES

SCHEDULE 4U.K.Relief for carried-forward losses

PART 12 U.K.Commencement etc

Parts 1 to 9 and 11U.K.

190(1)The amendments made by Parts 1 to 9 and 11 of this Schedule have effect in relation to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2017.U.K.

(2)For the purposes of those amendments, where a company has an accounting period beginning before 1 April 2017 and ending on or after that date (“the straddling period”)—

(a)so much of the straddling period as falls before 1 April 2017, and so much of that period as falls on or after that date, are treated as separate accounting periods, and

(b)where it is necessary to apportion an amount for the straddling period to the two separate accounting periods, it is to be apportioned—

(i)in accordance with section 1172 of CTA 2010 (time basis), or

(ii)if that method would produce a result that is unjust or unreasonable, on a just and reasonable basis.

(3)But sub-paragraph (2)(b) is to be ignored if paragraph 191 or 192 applies.

191(1)This paragraph applies if—U.K.

(a)an accounting period of a company (“the straddling period”) is treated as two separate accounting periods under paragraph 190(2)(a),

(b)it is necessary to apportion an amount (“the amount concerned”) for the straddling period to the two separate accounting periods, and

(c)the amount concerned is either—

(i)an amount chargeable to corporation tax which would have been less but for Part 10 of TIOPA 2010 (corporate interest restriction), or

(ii)an amount in respect of which corporation tax relief is available which would have been greater but for Part 10 of TIOPA 2010.

(2)The amount concerned is to be apportioned as follows—

192(1)This paragraph applies if—U.K.

(a)an accounting period of a company (“the straddling period”) is treated as two separate accounting periods under paragraph 190(2)(a),

(b)it is necessary to apportion an amount (“the amount concerned”) for the straddling period to the two separate accounting period,

(c)the amount concerned is an amount chargeable to corporation tax, and

(d)the amount concerned would not have arisen but for Part 10 of TIOPA 2010 (whether or not an amount in respect of which corporation tax relief would have been available would have arisen instead).

(2)The whole of the amount concerned is apportioned to the second separate accounting period.