44(1)Where—E+W
(a)it is proposed to include an electronic monitoring requirement in a youth rehabilitation order, but
(b)there is a person (other than the offender) without whose co-operation it will not be practicable to secure the monitoring,
the requirement may not be included in the order without that person's consent.
(2)A court may not include an electronic monitoring requirement in a youth rehabilitation order unless—
(a)the court has been notified by the Secretary of State that arrangements for electronic monitoring of offenders are available—
(i)in the local justice area proposed to be specified in the order as the offender's home local justice area, and
(ii)for each requirement mentioned in the table in sub-paragraph (3) which the court proposes to include in the order, in the area in which the relevant place specified in the table for that requirement is situated,
(and the notice has not been withdrawn in relation to any of those areas), and
(b)the court is satisfied that the necessary provision can be made under the arrangements currently available.
(3)That table is—
Proposed requirement of youth rehabilitation order | Relevant place |
---|---|
Curfew requirement | The place which the court proposes to specify in the order for the purposes of that requirement. |
Exclusion requirement | The prohibited place (within the meaning of paragraph 20) which the court proposes to specify in the order. |
Attendance centre requirement | The attendance centre which the court proposes to specify in the order. |
Modifications etc. (not altering text)
C1Sch. 6 Pt. 17 applied (with modifications) by 2008 c. 4, s. 39(6)(b), Sch. 7 (as amended (1.12.2020) by Sentencing Act 2020 (c. 17), s. 416(1), Sch. 24 paras. 266(5), 270 (with Sch. 24 para. 447, Sch. 27); S.I. 2020/1236, reg. 2)
Commencement Information
I1Sch. 6 para. 44 in force at 1.12.2020 by S.I. 2020/1236, reg. 2