xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

SCHEDULE 2E+W+SAPPLICABLE AMOUNTS

Modifications etc. (not altering text)

PART IIIE+W+Spremiums

Higher Pensioner PremiumE+W+S

10.[F1(1) The condition is that—

(a)the claimant’s partner is aged not less than 80; or

(b)the claimant’s partner is aged less than 80 but not less than 60 and either—

(i)the additional condition specified in [F2paragraph 12(1)(a), (c) or (d)] is satisfied; or

(ii)the claimant was entitled to, or was treated as being in receipt of, income support and—

(aa)the disability premium was or, as the case may be, would have been, applicable to him in respect of a benefit week within eight weeks of his partner’s 60th birthday; and

(bb)he has, subject to sub-paragraph (3), remained continuously entitled to income support since his partner attained the age of 60.]

(3) For the purposes of this paragraph and paragraph 12—

(a)once the higher pensioner premium is applicable to a claimant, if he then ceases, for a period of eight weeks or less, to be entitled to [F3or treated as entitled to] income support, he shall, on becoming re-entitled to income support, thereafter be treated as having been continuously entitled thereto;

(b)in so far as [F4sub-paragraph (1)(b)(ii) is] concerned, if a claimant ceases to be entitled to [F3or treated as entitled to] income support for a period not exceeding eight weeks which includes his [F4partner’s] 60th birthday, he shall, on becoming re-entitled to income support, thereafter be treated as having been continuously entitled thereto.

[F5(4) In the case of a claimant who is a welfare to work beneficiary, references in sub-paragraphs (1)(b)(ii), (2)(b)(ii) and (3)(b) to a period of 8 weeks shall be treated as references to a period of 52 weeks.]

[F6(5) For the purposes of this paragraph, a claimant shall be treated as having been entitled to and in receipt of income support throughout any period which comprises only days on which he was participating in an employment zone programme and was not entitled to income support because, as a consequence of his participation in that programme, he was engaged in remunerative work or had income in excess of his applicable amount as prescribed in Part IV.]