Textual Amendments
F1Pt. 52 substituted (3.10.2016) by The Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 3) Rules 2016 (S.I. 2016/788), rule 2, Sch. (with rule 16)
Modifications etc. (not altering text)
52.23.—(1) Where the court from or to which an appeal is made or from which permission to appeal is sought (“the relevant court”) considers that—
(a)an appeal which is to be heard by the County Court or the High Court would raise an important point of principle or practice; or
(b)there is some other compelling reason for the Court of Appeal to hear it,
the relevant court may order the appeal to be transferred to the Court of Appeal.
(The Master of the Rolls has the separate statutory power to direct that an appeal which would be heard by the County Court or the High Court should be heard instead by the Court of Appeal – see section 57 of the Access to Justice Act 1999.)
(2) The Master of the Rolls or the Court of Appeal may remit an appeal to the court in which the original appeal was or would have been brought.
52.24.—(1) A court officer assigned to the Civil Appeals Office who is—
(a)a barrister; or
(b)a solicitor
may exercise the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal with regard to the matters set out in paragraph (2) with the consent of the Master of the Rolls.
(2) The matters referred to in paragraph (1) are—
(a)any matter incidental to proceedings in the Court of Appeal;
(b)any other matter where there is no substantial dispute between the parties; and
(c)the dismissal of an appeal or application where a party has failed to comply with any order, rule or practice direction.
(3) A court officer may not decide an application for—
(a)permission to appeal;
(b)bail pending an appeal;
(c)an injunction(GL);
(d)a stay(GL) of execution of any order or decision of the lower court other than a temporary stay over a period when the Court of Appeal is not sitting or cannot conveniently be convened;
(e)a stay of proceedings in the lower court.
(4) Decisions of a court officer will be made without an oral hearing, unless a court officer directs otherwise.
(5) A party may request any decision of a court officer to be reviewed by a single judge, and—
(a)the review will be determined on paper without an oral hearing; except that
(b)the judge determining the review on paper may direct that the review be determined at an oral hearing, and must so direct if the judge is of the opinion that the review cannot be fairly determined on paper without an oral hearing.
(6) A party may request a decision of a single judge made without a hearing (other than a decision made on a review under paragraph (5) and a decision determining an application for permission to appeal) to be reconsidered, and—
(a)the reconsideration will be determined by the same or another judge on paper without an oral hearing; except that
(b)the judge determining the reconsideration on paper may direct that the reconsideration be determined at an oral hearing, and must so direct if the judge is of the opinion that the reconsideration cannot be fairly determined on paper without an oral hearing.
(7) A request under paragraph (5) or (6) must be filed within 7 days after the party is served with notice of the decision.
(8) A single judge may refer any matter for a decision by a court consisting of two or more judges.
(Section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999 provides that there is no appeal from the decision of a single judge on an application for permission to appeal.)
(Section 58(2) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 provides that there is no appeal to the Supreme Court from decisions of the Court of Appeal that—
(a)are taken by a single judge or any officer or member of staff of that court in proceedings incidental to any cause or matter pending before the civil division of that court; and
(b)do not involve the determination of an appeal or of an application for permission to appeal,
and which may be called into question by rules of court. Paragraphs (5) and (6) of this rule provide the procedure for the calling into question of such decisions.)]