Commission Decision of 29 April 2005 providing for a derogation from certain provisions of Council Directive 2000/29/EC as regards oak (Quercus L.) logs with bark attached, originating in the United States of America (notified under document number C(2005) 1298) (2005/359/EC)

  1. Introductory Text

  2. Article 1.By way of derogation from Article 5(1) of Directive 2000/29/EC...

  3. Article 2.(1) In order to benefit from this exemption the logs...

  4. Article 3.(1) The logs shall only be unloaded in ports listed...

  5. Article 4.(1) The inspections required pursuant to Article 13 of Directive...

  6. Article 5.(1) The logs shall only be stored in places which...

  7. Article 6.(1) The logs shall only be processed at plants which...

  8. Article 7.(1) Prior to importation, the importer shall notify each consignment...

  9. Article 8.(1) Member States may exempt logs of Quercus L. species...

  10. Article 9.Member States shall communicate to the Commission and the other...

  11. Article 10.Member States which have made use of the derogation provided...

  12. Article 11.The Decision shall expire on 31 December 2020 .

  13. Article 12.This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

    1. ANNEX I

      CONDITIONS ON FUMIGATION AND RELATED IDENTIFICATION REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 2.1

      1. 1. The logs shall have been piled on an impervious surface...

      2. 2. Without prejudice to any additional export requirements set by the...

      3. 3. The fumigation procedures as described in 1 and 2 shall...

      4. 4. A fumigation batch identification mark (digits and/or letters) shall have...

      5. 5. The individual fumigation procedure including the marking referred to in...

      6. 6. The official phytosanitary certificate required pursuant to Article 13(1)(ii) of...

      7. 7. This certificate shall indicate the botanical name of the genus...

      8. 8. In the case of logs to be dispatched via Canadian...

    2. ANNEX II

      PORTS OF UNLOADING

      1. 1. Amsterdam

      2. 2. Antwerp

      3. 3. Århus

      4. 4. Bilbao

      5. 5. Bremen

      6. 6. Bremerhaven

      7. 7. Copenhagen

      8. 8. Hamburg

      9. 9. Klaipeda

      10. 10. Koper

      11. 11. Larnaca

      12. 12. Leghorn

      13. 13. Le Havre

      14. 14. Lemesos

      15. 15. Lisbon

      16. 16. Marseilles

      17. 17. Marsaxlokk

      18. 18. Muuga

      19. 19. Naples

      20. 20. Nordenham

      21. 21. Oporto

      22. 22. Piraeus

      23. 23. Ravenna

      24. 24. Riga

      25. 25. Rostock

      26. 26. Rotterdam

      27. 27. Salerno

      28. 28. Sines

      29. 29. Stralsund

      30. 30. Valencia

      31. 31. Valletta

      32. 32. Venice

      33. 33. Vigo

      34. 34. Wismar

      35. 35. Zeebrugge

    3. ANNEX III

      FUMIGATION COLOUR REACTION TEST

      1. The fumigation colour reaction test referred to in Article 4(2)(c)...

      2. Samples of the entire sapwood thickness shall be taken with...

    4. ANNEX IV

      WHITE OAK LOG IDENTIFICATION

      1. 1. Officials of the official plant protection organisation concerned shall have...

      2. 2. The white oak log identification colour test shall be carried...

      3. 3. Each log shall be marked ‘WO’, under the supervision of...

      4. 4. The official phytosanitary certificate required pursuant to Article 13(1)(ii) of...