- Latest available (Revised)
- Point in Time (28/07/2006)
- Original (As adopted by EU)
When the UK left the EU, legislation.gov.uk published EU legislation that had been published by the EU up to IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.). On legislation.gov.uk, these items of legislation are kept up-to-date with any amendments made by the UK since then.
Legislation.gov.uk publishes the UK version. EUR-Lex publishes the EU version. The EU Exit Web Archive holds a snapshot of EUR-Lex’s version from IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.).
Version Superseded: 01/01/2014
Point in time view as at 28/07/2006.
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Commission Decision of 28 July 2006 concerning the technical specification of interoperability relating to the subsystem ‘rolling stock — freight wagons’ of the trans-European conventional rail system (notified under document number C(2006) 3345) (Text with EEA relevance) (2006/861/EC) (repealed), ANNEX J.
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
Bogie and running gear
The applied loads consist of:
vertical and transverse loads,
loads due to roll,
loads due to braking,
torsional loads.
The vertical and transverse loads are calculated by reference to the nominal bogie load (for example: bogie for 20 t or 22,5 t on-rail axle load).
In order to take the maximum dynamic load into account:
The vertical load to be applied to the pivot bearing shall be:
If only the vertical load due to bounce is to be simulated, a load of 2 Fz shall be applied to the pivot bearing only.
The transverse load to be applied to the bogie shall be:
NB: The transverse loads for 3-axle bogies given are based on the load distribution recorded during running trials for the qualification of bogie type 714. For a different bogie type, the load distribution recorded during running trials with the bogie type shall be used.
The roll coefficient α is taken to be equal to 0,3 for a spacing between the friction pads of 1 700 mm (standard 2-axle bogies).
If the spacing between the friction pads (2 bg) differs from 1 700 mm, the value for α should be:
The loads due to braking FB correspond to 120 % of the forces resulting from emergency braking.
On the bogie under test, these loads due to braking FB result in:
deceleration loads,
contact loads,
loads applied to the brake linkages.
Loads on the bogie frame, when the bogie with its suspension is subjected to a maximum track twist of 10 ‰.
Strain gauges and strain rosettes are attached to the bogie frame at all highly stressed points, in particular in zones of stress concentration. Positioning of the gauges shall be determined, for example, by means of strain indicating varnish.
The test shall be carried out in accordance with Figure 1 and Table J5 (for 2-axle bogies) or Figure 2 and Table J6 (for 3-axle bogies).
The test loads shall be applied in steps. Loads with values corresponding to 50 % and 75 % of the maximum values shall be applied before applying the full load configuration.
The elastic limit of the material shall not be exceeded for any load case.
After removal of the test load there shall not be any evidence of permanent deformation.
Load case | Loads | Track twist g+ | Braking forces | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vertical | Trans- verse | |||||
Friction pad 2 Fz2 | Pivot bearing Fzc | Friction pad 1 Fz1 | Fy | |||
1 | 2Fz | |||||
2 | 0 | (1-α) Fz max | α Fz max | 10 ‰ | ||
3 | 0 | (1-α) Fz max | α Fz max | Fy max | ||
4 | α Fz max | (1-α) Fz max | 0 | -Fy max | ||
5 | 0 | 1,2 Fz | 0 | FB |
Load Case | Loads | Track Twist g+ | Braking Force | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vertical | Transverse | |||||
Friction pad 2 Fz2 | Pivot Bearing Fzc | Friction Pad 1 Fz1 | Fy | |||
1 | 2 Fz | |||||
2 | 0 | (1-α) Fz max | α Fz max | 10 ‰ | ||
3 | 0 | (1-α) Fz max | α Fz max | Fy max | ||
4 | α Fz max | (1-α) Fz max | 0 | -Fy max | ||
5 | 0 | 1,2 Fz | 0 | FB |
The applied loads consist of:
vertical loads on the pivot bearing and friction pads,
a transverse load,
loads due to braking,
torsional loads.
The vertical loads on the pivot bearing and friction pads shall be calculated by reference to the nominal bogie load. They depend on:
Fz, the static load exerted by the wagon body on each bogie
α, the roll coefficient
β, the bounce coefficient
The roll coefficient α is taken to be equal to 0,2 for a spacing between the friction pads of 1 700 mm (standard 2-axle bogies).
If the spacing between the friction pads (2bg) differs from 1 700 mm, the value for α should be:
The bounce coefficient β that represents the vertical dynamic behaviour of the bogie shall be taken to be equal to 0,3 (the normal value for wagon bogies).
The transverse load shall be equal to:
The loads due to braking correspond to 100 % of the forces resulting from emergency braking.
On the bogie under test, these loads due to braking result in the following loads being applied:
deceleration loads
contact loads
Loads applied to the brake linkages
Track twist, referenced to the bogie wheelbase, is taken to be equal to 5 ‰.
This twist g+ shall be simulated either by moving the supports or by applying the corresponding calculated reaction forces.
Strain gauges and strain rosettes shall be attached to the bogie frame at all highly stressed points, in particular in zones of stress concentration.
The test consists of applying various load configurations to the bogie frame that simulate:
running on straight track
running in curves
dynamic load variations due to roll and bounce
braking
track twist
The various load cases to be applied are described in Figure 3 and Table 7 (for two-axle bogies) and Figure 4 and Table 8 (for three-axle bogies).
After application of the first seven load cases without simulation of track twist, four further tests shall be carried out by repeating load cases 4, 5, 6 and 7 with superposition of the track twist (value as specified for the bogie with its suspension).
For each of these four new load cases, the loads due to twist shall be applied first in one direction and then in the other.
The introduction of the track twist shall not modify the sum of the vertical forces.
Tests with application of loads corresponding to the loads due to braking shall be carried out if the results of the tests according to Appendix A show them to be necessary (elastic limit exceeded during those tests).
At each measuring point, the stresses σ1…σn shall be recorded for each of the load cases defined above.
From these n values, the minimum value σmin., and the maximum value σmax. are taken in order to determine:
The behaviour of materials, including welded joints and other types of fastening, under fatigue loading should be based on current international or national standards, or alternative sources of equivalent standing such as the one based on ERRI B12 Committee report RPI7, wherever such sources are available.
Suitable data shall generally exhibit the following characteristics:
a high probability of survival (i.e. preferably 97,5 %, but at least 95 %);
classification of details according to the component or joint geometry (including stress concentration);
derivation of the limiting values from small-scale samples using a test technique and previous experience to guarantee their applicability to full size components.
If the stress limits to be respected are those given in the fatigue strength diagrams in ERRI B12 Committee report RPI7, it will be permissible to exceed these stress limits by up to 20 % at a limited number of measurement points, which shall then be monitored with particular care during the fatigue testing. If no incipient cracks are found during testing, the stresses exceeding the limit recorded during static testing shall be accepted and the bogie shall be approved.
Load Case | Loads | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vertical | Transverse | Braking Forces | |||
Friction pad 2 Fz2 | Pivot Bearing Fzc | Friction Pad 1 Fz1 | Fy | ||
1 | 0 | Fz | 0 | ||
2 | 0 | (1+β)Fz | 0 | ||
3 | 0 | (1-β)Fz | 0 | ||
4 | 0 | (1-α)(1+β) Fz | α(1+β)Fz | Fy | |
5 | α(1+β)Fz | (1-α)(1+β) Fz | 0 | -Fy | |
6 | 0 | (1-α)(1-β) Fz | α(1-β)Fz | Fy | |
7 | α(1-β)Fz | (1-α)(1-β) Fz | 0 | -Fy | |
8 | 0 | Fz | 0 | FB |
Load Case | Loads | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vertical | Transverse | Braking Forces | |||
Friction Pad 2 Fz2 | Pivot Bearing Fzc | Friction Pad 1 Fz1 | Fy | ||
1 | 0 | Fz | 0 | ||
2 | 0 | (1+β) Fz | 0 | ||
3 | 0 | (1-β) Fz | 0 | ||
4 | 0 | (1-α)(1+β)Fz | α(1+β) Fz | Fy | |
5 | α(1+β) Fz | (1-α)(1+β)Fz | 0 | -Fy | |
6 | 0 | (1-α)(1-β)Fz | α(1-β) Fz | Fy | |
7 | α(1-β) Fz | (1-α)(1-β)Fz | 0 | -Fy | |
8 | 0 | Fz | 0 | FB |
Definitions of applied loads
The applied loads consist of:
vertical loads on the pivot bearing and friction pads
a transverse load
loads due to braking
torsional loads
The vertical loads on the pivot bearing and friction pads shall be calculated by reference to the nominal bogie load. They depend on:
Fz, the static load exerted by the wagon body on each bogie
α, the roll coefficient = 0,2
β, the bounce coefficient = 0,3
Fz is a static load. The loads due to the coefficient α are considered to be ‘quasi static’. The loads due to the coefficient β are considered to be ‘dynamic’.
The roll coefficient α is taken to be equal to 0,2 for a spacing between the friction pads of 1 700 mm (standard two-axle bogies). If the spacing between the friction pads (2bg) differs from 1 700 mm, the value for α shall be:
The transverse loads consist of two components:
Two-axle bogies:
Three-axle bogies:
The loads due to braking correspond to 100 % of the forces resulting from emergency braking.
On the bogie under test, these loads due to braking result in the following loads being applied:
deceleration loads,
contact loads,
loads applied to the brake linkages.
Track twist, referenced to the bogie wheelbase, shall be 5 ‰.
The fatigue tests consist of alternating quasi-static and dynamic load sequences that represent running through right and left-hand curves.
If the static tests defined in Appendix B have shown that the track twist induced stresses only in limited zones of the bogie frame, where the stresses caused by the vertical and transverse loads are minor, the fatigue test, as a first stage, shall be performed with only vertical and transverse loads.
In this case, the vertical and transverse quasi-static and dynamic loads shall vary with time as shown in the diagrams in Figures 3, 5, 6 and 7 (for two-axle bogies) or in Figures 5, 6, 7 and 8 (for three-axle bogies).
In each sequence corresponding to a curve to the right or to the left, the number of dynamic cycles, vertically and transversely, shall be 20.
The dynamic variations of the vertical and transverse loads shall be of the same frequency and shall be in phase, as shown in the diagrams. The number of sequences simulating right hand curves and left hand curves in the test shall be the same.
In this first test stage, the number of cycles of dynamic load variations shall be 6 × 106.
The second test stage shall consist of 2 × 106 cycles, with the static forces unchanged and the quasi-static and dynamic forces multiplied by 1,2.
The third test stage shall also consist of 2 × 106 cycles and is performed as the second stage, but with the factor 1,2 replaced by 1,4.
Tests with application of loads corresponding to the loads due to braking shall be carried out if the results of the tests according to section 2 show them to be necessary (elastic limit exceeded during those tests).
A total of 106 alternating torsional load cycles shall be applied in all:
6 × 105 during the first test stage
2 × 105 during each of the other two stages
When specifying the torsional tests, the results of the static tests and the capabilities of the existing test facilities shall be taken into account.
If the static tests have shown that the bogie frame is not affected by track twist, it shall not be taken into account.
If the static tests in Appendix B show that the effects of the track twist loads are clearly different from those resulting from the vertical and transverse forces (e.g. because the stresses occur in different zones), the 6 × 105 plus twice 2 × 105 cycles of torsional loading can be applied separately from the vertical and transverse loads. Otherwise, the test setup shall be adapted in order to apply the vertical, transverse and track twist loads simultaneously.
The loads that simulate the effect of track twist shall correspond to those that occur when the suspension is functioning with damping.
No cracks shall be found after application of the 6 × 106 cycles of the first test stage. This shall be confirmed by non-destructive inspection (magnetic particle or dye penetration test) after every 1 × 106 cycles.
At the end of the second test stage, only the occurrence of small cracks, that would not require immediate repairs if they occurred in service, shall be acceptable.
The evolution of the stresses at the locations of highest stress found during the static test (paragraph 6.1.1.2.1.3) shall be monitored by means of strain gauges during the fatigue test, and in particular where stresses exceeding the stress limit have been tolerated in accordance with paragraph 6.1.1.2.1.3
Refer to figure J3.
Refer to fig. J5.
Refer to figure J6.
Refer to figure J7
Qo = Static vertical force at the level of the wheel for a loaded wagon (kN)
m+ = Bogie mass (t)
Fz = Static vertical force acting on a bogie for a loaded wagon (kN)
Fz = 4Qo- m+g (for 2-axle bogies)
Fz = 6Qo — m+g (for 3-axle bogies)
g = Acceleration due to gravity (9,8 m/s2)
Fy = Transverse force (kN)
FB = Braking forces (kN)
g+ = Track twist to be applied to the bogie axles ( ‰)
α = Coefficient corresponding to the effect of roll
The coefficient is a function of the spacing 2bg
β = Coefficient corresponding to the effect of bounce
2bg = Friction pad spacing (mm)
The tests can be divided into three groups:
Static tests with exceptional in-service loads
These tests verify that there is no risk of permanent and visible deformation of the bogie frame due to the superposition of the maximum loads that can occur in service.
Static tests to simulate normal in-service dynamic loads
These tests verify that there is no risk of fatigue cracks occurring due to the superposition of in-service loads.
Fatigue tests
The purpose of these tests is to determine the service life of the bogie frame, to detect potential hidden weak spots — in particular at locations where it is not possible to attach strain gauges, — and to assess the safety margin.
The tests shall be performed using a test set-up that allows the application and distribution of the loads exactly at the same locations where they occur in service, while at the same time correctly simulating the play and the degrees of freedom associated with the suspension and the elements connecting the bogie to the body.
The tests can be performed with or without the suspension.
The suspension damping devices shall be de-activated so as to prevent friction.
The constructional characteristics of the bogie shall be taken into account when determining the manner in which the loads and the resulting reaction forces are applied to the bogie frame. The sketch below shows an example of the application of the loads on 2-axle bogies.
The loads to be applied are detailed in Appendices A, B and C.
The Whole Decision you have selected contains over 200 provisions and might take some time to download. You may also experience some issues with your browser, such as an alert box that a script is taking a long time to run.
Would you like to continue?
The Schedules you have selected contains over 200 provisions and might take some time to download. You may also experience some issues with your browser, such as an alert box that a script is taking a long time to run.
Would you like to continue?
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As adopted by EU): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was first adopted in the EU. No changes have been applied to the text.
Point in Time: This becomes available after navigating to view revised legislation as it stood at a certain point in time via Advanced Features > Show Timeline of Changes or via a point in time advanced search.
Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.
Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
This timeline shows the different versions taken from EUR-Lex before exit day and during the implementation period as well as any subsequent versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation.
The dates for the EU versions are taken from the document dates on EUR-Lex and may not always coincide with when the changes came into force for the document.
For any versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation the date will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. For further information see our guide to revised legislation on Understanding Legislation.
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: