THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 of 13 November 1984 determining the Community scale for grading pig carcases(1), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) Under Article 2(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84, the grading of pig carcases is to be determined by estimating the lean meat content by means of statistically proven assessment methods based on the physical measurement of one or more anatomical parts of the pig carcase. The authorisation of grading methods is subject to compliance with a maximum tolerance for statistical error in assessment. This tolerance is defined in Article 3(2) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85 of 24 October 1985 laying down detailed rules for the application of the Community scale for grading pig carcases(2).
(2) Commission Decision 88/479/EEC(3) authorises four methods (DEST, FOM, HGP and Autofom) for grading pig carcases in Spain.
(3) Due to technical adaptations, Spain has asked the Commission to authorise the update of two methods (FOM and Autofom), the utilisation of two new methods (Ultrafom 300 and VCS2000) and the repeal of two methods (HGP and DEST), and has presented the results of its dissection trials in the second part of the protocol provided for in Article 3(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85.
(4) Examination of this request has revealed that the conditions for authorising these grading methods are fulfilled.
(5) In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 2(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 Member States may be authorised to provide for a presentation of pig carcases different from the one specified in that Article where commercial practice or technical requirements warrant such a derogation. In Spain, commercial practice may require also the removal of the forefeet from the pig carcases, in addition to the removal of the tongue, bristles, hooves, genital organs, fare flat, kidneys and diaphragm as required by Article 2(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84.
(6) No modification of the apparatus or grading methods may be authorised except by means of a new Commission Decision adopted in the light of experience gained. For this reason, the present authorisation may be revoked.
(7) For the sake of clarity, Decision 88/479/EEC should be repealed and replaced by a new Decision.
(8) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
The use of the following methods is authorised for grading pig carcasses pursuant to point 1 of Section B.IV of Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4) in Spain:
the ‘ Fat-O-Meat'er (FOM) ’ apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 1 of the Annex;
the ‘ Fully automatic ultrasonic carcase grading (Autofom) ’ apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 2 of the Annex;
[F2. . . . .]
the ‘ Automatic vision system (VCS2000) ’ apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 4 of the Annex;
the ‘ Fat-O-Meat'er II (FOM II) ’ apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 5 of the Annex;
the ‘ AutoFOM III ’ apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 6 of the Annex;
the ‘ manual method (ZP) ’ with a ruler and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 7 of the Annex;
the ‘ CSB-Image-Meater ’ apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 8 of the Annex;
[F3the ‘ gmSCAN ’ apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 9 of the Annex;]
[F4the ‘ OptiScan TP ’ apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 10 of the Annex.]
[F3The manual method ZP with a ruler, referred to in point (g) of the first paragraph, shall only be authorised for abattoirs:
where the number of slaughters does not exceed 700 pigs per week on yearly average basis; and
having a slaughter line with a capacity to process no more than 50 pigs per hour.] ]
Textual Amendments
F1 Substituted by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1521 of 10 October 2018 amending Decision 2009/11/EC authorising methods for grading pig carcasses in Spain (notified under document C(2018) 6507) (Only the Spanish text is authentic).
F2 Deleted by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/113 of 23 January 2020 amending Decision 2009/11/EC authorising methods for grading pig carcasses in Spain (notified under document C(2020) 232) (Only the Spanish text is authentic).
By way of derogation from Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84, pig carcases may be presented also without forefeet before being weighed and graded. In this case, in order to establish quotations for pig carcases on a comparable basis, the recorded hot weight shall be increased by 0,840 kilograms.
Modifications of the apparatus or the assessment methods shall not be authorised.
Decision 88/479/EEC is repealed.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain.
where:
=
the thickness of the fat between the third and fourth last rib at 60 mm of the midline of the carcase (in millimetres),
=
the thickness of muscle measured at the same time and in the same place as X1 (in millimetres).
This formula shall be valid for carcases weighing between 60 and 120 kilograms.
The ultrasonic data shall comprise measurements of back fat thickness and muscle thickness.
The results of the measurements are converted into estimated lean meat content using a computer.
= 70,59614 – 0,0904 · V22 – 0,23033 · V23 – 0,15558 · V44 + 0,086638 · V46 – 0,09965 · V48 – 0,10002 · V49 – 0,11624 · V51 – 0,05561 · V52 – 0,04854 · V53 – 0,0432 · V54 – 0,00282 · V55 + 0,051829 · V57 + 0,036795 · V58 – 0,00519 · V59 – 0,0269 · V60 – 0,06432 · V61 – 0,05323 · V62 – 0,05229 · V64 – 0,0523 · V65 + 0,005645 · V72 – 0,06505 · V73 – 0,04587 · V74 + 0,015041 · V77 + 0,030928 · V78 – 0,08024 · V79 – 0,07275 · V80 – 0,07497 · V85 – 0,06818 · V86 – 0,06875 · V87 – 0,04742 · V90 – 0,00698 · V91 + 0,046485 · V92 – 0,10403 · V93 + 0,160475 · V123
where:
V22, V23, … V123 are the variables measured with the Autofom.
This formula shall be valid for carcases weighing between 60 and 120 kilograms.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
= 37,49855 + 0,017715 · X2 – 0,00075 · X40 – 0,02522 · X50 – 0,04549 · X52 – 0,0000335 · X59 – 0,000093 · X62 – 0,0000814 · X63 – 0,0000715 · X64 – 0,0000494 · X66 – 0,0000482 · X67 – 0,00047 · X69 + 0,000304 · X70 + 0,00867 · X77 – 0,03007 · X79 – 0,04575 · X81 – 0,01742 · X82 – 0,01768 · X83 – 0,03114 · X84 – 0,02549 · X85 – 0,0265 · X92 – 0,03299 · X95 – 0,02472 · X99 – 0,0399 · X102 + 0,020178 · X103 – 0,04614 · X106 + 0,012659 · X107 + 0,012256 · X110 + 0,015358 · X113 – 0,23294 · X116 + 0,010157 · X117 – 0,07282 · X120 + 0,126624 · X142 + 6,052785 · X2/6 – 13,2893 · X14/10 + 7,287408 · X77/51 – 4,09296 · X79/51 – 11,4326 · X81/51 – 1,28847 · X82/51 – 0,57019 · X83/51 – 5,21869 · X84/51 – 2,92106 · X85/51 + 8,274608 · X88/51 + 9,886478 · X91/51 – 0,00442 · X47/79 – 0,04848 · X50/79 + 0,227913 · X54/79 + 2,845209 · X77/79 + 0,018409 · X86/79 – 0,00838 · X89/79 + 0,007447 · X94/79 + 136,5994 · X27/20 + 182,973 · X29/20 – 6,82665 · X59/20 – 261 768 · X61/20 – 7,85416 · X62/20 – 3,8587 · X63/20 – 16,6166 · X64/20 – 59,2087 · X65/20 – 3,21138 · X66/20 – 6,96096 · X67/20 + 20,91982 · X68/20 – 109,736 · X69/20 + 243,641 · X70/20 + 29,84246 · X73/20 + 15,50442 · X74/20 – 0,30367 · X36/59 – 2,07787 · X40/59 – 0,38605 · X42/59 – 1,90547 · X69/59 + 3,554836 · X70/59
where:
X2, X40, … X70/59 are the variables measured with the VCS2000.
This formula shall be valid for carcases weighing between 60 and 120 kilograms.
Ŷ = 69,592 – (0,741 × X 1 )+ (0,066 × X 2 )
where:
the estimated percentage of lean meat in a carcass;
the thickness of back-fat (including rind) in millimetres, measured perpendicularly to the back of the carcass at 6 cm of the split line, between the third and fourth last ribs;
the thickness of the dorsal muscle in millimetres, measured at the same time, in the same place and in the same way as X 1 .
This formula shall be valid for carcasses weighing between 60 and 120 kilograms (warm weight).
Ŷ = 75,39088 – (1,39968 × R2P1) – (0,45787 × R2P4) – (0,47094 × R2P10) + (0,20349 × R4P6)
where:
the estimated percentage of lean meat in a carcass,
the average thickness of the skin;
the P2 fat measure at the selected position in mm;
minimum fat of the cross-section in mm;
the fat 1 measurements in the selected MFT point.
This formula is valid for carcasses weighing between 60 and 120 kg (warm weight).
Ŷ = 66,324 – (0,526 × F) + (0,034 × M)
where:
the estimated percentage of lean meat in the carcass,
the minimum thickness of visible fat (including rind), in millimetres, on the midline of the split carcass in millimetres, covering the muscle gluteus medius ,
the visible thickness of the lumbar muscle, in millimetres, on the midline of the split carcass, measured as the shortest connection between the front (cranial) end of the muscle gluteus medius and the upper (dorsal) edge of the vertebral canal.
This formula shall valid for carcasses weighing between 60 and 120 kg (warm weight).]
Ŷ = 68,39920953 – (0,39050694 × F) – (0,32611391 × V4F) + (0,07864716 × M) – (0,00762296 × V4M)
where:
=
the estimated percentage of lean meat in a carcass,
=
fat thickness as thinnest layer above muscle gluteus medius (in millimetres),
=
Average fat thickness of the complete bacon layer above the four lumbar vertebra (called VaF, VbF, VcF, VdF) (in millimetres),
=
Meat thickness from the cranial edge of muscle gluteus medius and the vertebrae canal (in millimetres),
=
Average meat thickness above the four lumbar vertebra (called VaM, VbM, VcM, VdM) (in millimetres).
This formula shall be valid for carcasses weighing between 60 and 120 kilograms (warm weight).]
Textual Amendments
Ŷ = 55,14067 + 1 598,66166 × (Q1/CW) – 579,58575 × (Q2/CW) + 970,83879 × (Q3/CW) – 0,18993 × CW
where:
=
the estimated percentage of lean meat in a carcass;
=
Magnetic Induction response (Volts) from the ham, middle and shoulder area, respectively;
=
warm carcass weight (in kilograms).
This formula shall be valid for carcasses weighing between 60 and 120 kilograms (warm weight).]
Textual Amendments
Ŷ = 67,496 – (0,522 x F) + (0,032 x M)
where:
the estimated percentage of lean meat in a carcass;
the minimal thickness of visible fat (including rind) in millimetres, on the midline of the split carcass, covering the muscle gluteus medius;
the visible thickness of the lumbar muscle, in millimetres, on the midline of the split carcass, measured as the shortest connection between the front (cranial) end of the muscle gluteus medius and the upper (dorsal) edge of the vertebral canal.
This formula shall be valid for carcasses weighing between 60 and 120 kilograms (warm weight).]
[F1Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 ( OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671 ).]