- Latest available (Revised)
- Original (As adopted by EU)
When the UK left the EU, legislation.gov.uk published EU legislation that had been published by the EU up to IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.). On legislation.gov.uk, these items of legislation are kept up-to-date with any amendments made by the UK since then.
Legislation.gov.uk publishes the UK version. EUR-Lex publishes the EU version. The EU Exit Web Archive holds a snapshot of EUR-Lex’s version from IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.).
There are currently no known outstanding effects by UK legislation for Commission Implementing Decision of 12 November 2013 on the monitoring and reporting of antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and commensal bacteria (notified under document C(2013) 7145) (Text with EEA relevance) (2013/652/EU), Division 4..
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
For the purpose of estimating the proportion of samples containing ESBL- or AmpC- or carbapenemase-producing E. coli amongst the caecal samples collected from broilers, fattening turkeys, fattening pigs, bovines under one year of age, fresh meat of broilers, pig meat and bovine meat in accordance with point 1(d) of this Part, the following method shall apply.
For the detection of ESBL- or AmpC-producing E. coli the method shall start by a pre-enrichment step, followed by inoculation on McConkey agar containing a third generation cephalosporin in a selective concentration according to the most recent version of the detailed protocol for standardisation of the European Union Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance(1). The microbial species E. coli shall be identified using an appropriated method.
The [F1appropriate authority] may decide, based on the epidemiological circumstances, to test in parallel an additional selective plate that inhibits for the growth of AmpC-producing E. coli to facilitate the specific detection of ESBL-producing E. coli. When using this possibility, the results of the additional selective plate that inhibits for growth of AmpC-producing E. coli shall be kept separately when reported in accordance with point 2 of Part B.
Textual Amendments
F1Words in Annex Pt. A point 4.1 substituted (31.12.2020) by The Zoonotic Disease Eradication and Control (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/740), regs. 1, 11(16)(a); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
[F2The appropriate authority] may decide to detect for carbapenemase-producing micro-organisms by using selective pre-enrichment and subsequent selective plating on carbapenem-containing media, according to the most recent version of the detailed protocol for standardisation of the European Union Reference Laboratory for AMR(2).
Textual Amendments
F2Words in Annex Pt. A point 4.1 substituted (31.12.2020) by The Zoonotic Disease Eradication and Control (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/740), regs. 1, 11(16)(b); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
One presumptive ESBL- or AmpC- or carbapenemase-producing E. coli isolate obtained from each positive caecal sample and meat sample shall be tested on the first panel of antimicrobials in accordance with Table 1 and further submitted to extended susceptibility testing as set out in point 4.2 if they are resistant to cefotaxime or ceftazidime or meropenem based on the interpretative criteria (epidemiological cut-off values) listed in Table 1.
All presumptive ESBL- or AmpC- or carbapenemase-producing E. coli isolates identified through the selective plating described in point 4.1 as well as all those randomly selected isolates of Salmonella spp. and E. coli that after testing with the first panel of antimicrobials in accordance with Table 1, are resistant to cefotaxime or ceftazidime or meropenem, shall be further tested with a second panel of antimicrobial substances in accordance with Table 4. This panel includes cefoxitin, cefepime and clavulanate synergy test in combination with cefotaxime and ceftazidime for detection of ESBL and AmpC production. In addition the second panel also contains imipenem, meropenem and ertapenem to phenotypically verify the presumptive carbapenemase-producers.
Panel of antimicrobial substances, EUCAST epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) and clinical resistance breakpoints and concentrations ranges to be used for testing only Salmonella spp. and indicator commensal E. coli isolates resistant to cefotaxime or ceftazidime or meropenem — (Second panel)
a EUCAST epidemiological cut-off values. | ||||
b EUCAST clinical resistance breakpoints. | ||||
c 4 mg/L clavulanic acid. | ||||
d The values shall be compared to the values of Cefotaxime and Ceftazidime and interpreted according to CLSI or EUCAST guidelines regarding synergy testing. | ||||
NA : not available. | ||||
Antimicrobial | Species | Interpretative thresholds of AMR(mg/L) | Range of concentrations (mg/L)(No of wells in brackets) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ECOFFa | Clinical breakpointb | |||
Cefoxitin | Salmonella | > 8 | NA | 0,5-64 (8) |
E. coli | > 8 | NA | ||
Cefepime | Salmonella | NA | NA | 0,06-32 (10) |
E. coli | > 0,125 | > 4 | ||
Cefotaxime + clavulanic acidc | Salmonella | NAd | NAd | 0,06-64 (11) |
E. coli | NAd | NAd | ||
Ceftazidime + clavulanic acidc | Salmonella | NAd | NAd | 0,125-128 (11) |
E. coli | NAd | NAd | ||
Meropenem | Salmonella | > 0,125 | > 8 | 0,03-16 (10) |
E. coli | > 0,125 | > 8 | ||
Temocillin | Salmonella | NA | NA | 0,5-64 (8) |
E. coli | NA | NA | ||
Imipenem | Salmonella | > 1 | > 8 | 0,12-16 (8) |
E. coli | > 0,5 | > 8 | ||
Ertapenem | Salmonella | > 0,06 | > 1 | 0,015-2 (8) |
E. coli | > 0,06 | > 1 | ||
Cefotaxime | Salmonella | > 0.5 | > 2 | 0,25-64 (9) |
E. coli | > 0,25 | > 2 | ||
Ceftazidime | Salmonella | > 2 | > 4 | 0,25-128 (10) |
E. coli | > 0,5 | > 4 |
[F3The appropriate authority] may characterise the proportion of ESBL- or AmpC-producing E. coli within the whole E. coli population.
Textual Amendments
F3Words in Annex Pt. A point 4.3 substituted (31.12.2020) by The Zoonotic Disease Eradication and Control (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/740), regs. 1, 11(17); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
That shall be done by enumerating ESBL- or AmpC-producing E. coli and total E. coli present in a sample using dilution methods and subsequent plating onto selective media and non-selective media, according to the most recent version of the detailed protocol of the European Union Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance(3).
www.crl-ar.eu
See footnote 3.
See footnote 3.
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As adopted by EU): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was first adopted in the EU. No changes have been applied to the text.
Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.
Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
This timeline shows the different versions taken from EUR-Lex before exit day and during the implementation period as well as any subsequent versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation.
The dates for the EU versions are taken from the document dates on EUR-Lex and may not always coincide with when the changes came into force for the document.
For any versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation the date will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. For further information see our guide to revised legislation on Understanding Legislation.
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: