“ANNEX IV CONTENT OF THE EVALUATION REPORT
I. Data on the control, inspection and enforcement activities carried out by [Member State concerned] at sea and on land
Table 1
Analysis of inspection activities at sea
| Patrol days | No of inspections (total/very high/high risk) | No of confirmed serious infringements detected (total/very high/high risk) | Serious infringement rate average (confirmed infringements/inspections) | Serious infringement rate on low and medium risk vessels (infringements/inspections) | Serious infringement rate on high and very high risk vessels (infringements/inspections) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provided | Committed | |||||
| 30 (*) | 30 | 100/70/30 | 4/3/1 | 4:100 = 4 % | 3:70 = 4,3 % | 1/30 = 3,3 % |
Table 2
Analysis of inspection activities on land
| a 2nd row in Tables 1 and 2 give an example aiming to facilitate completing the table. | ||||||
| Inspection men/days on land | No of inspections (total/very high/high risk) | No of confirmed serious infringements detected (total/very high/high risk) | Serious infringement rate average (confirmed infringements/inspections) | Serious infringement rate on low and medium risk vessels (infringements/inspections) | Serious infringement rate on high and very high risk vessels (infringements/inspections) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provided | Committed | |||||
| 200a | 200 | 400/350/50 | 40/30/10 | 40:400 = 10 % | 30:350 = 8,6 % | 10:50 = 20 % |
II. Analysis of target benchmarks expressed in terms of improved compliance levels
If the Member State applies alternative target benchmarks, referred to in Article 8(3) of this Decision, the following information shall be reported:
Table 3
Achievement of improved compliance levels.
| Description of the activity threat/risk/vessel segment | Very high risk/high risk/medium risk/low risk/very low risk
|