1.MONITORING METHODS 1.1.The following monitoring methods do not add, replace or supersede...1.2.In-depth monitoring 1.2.1.Member States shall apply an in-depth monitoring method that thoroughly...1.2.2.The in-depth monitoring method shall verify all the steps of...1.2.3.The in-depth monitoring method shall evaluate at least the interaction...1.2.4.The in-depth monitoring method may include, where appropriate, usability tests...1.2.5.The monitoring body may use, fully or in part, evaluation...1.2.6.Member States shall ensure that, subject to any relevant legal...1.3.Simplified monitoring 1.3.1.Member States shall apply a simplified monitoring method to websites...1.3.2.The simplified monitoring method shall include tests related to each...1.3.3.After each deadline to submit a report, as established in...2.SAMPLING OF THE WEBSITES AND MOBILE APPLICATIONS 2.1.Size of the sample 2.1.1.The number of websites and mobile applications to be monitored...2.1.2.In the first and second monitoring period, the minimum sample...2.1.3.In the subsequent monitoring periods, the minimum sample size for...2.1.4.The sample size for the in-depth monitoring of websites shall...2.1.5.The minimum sample size for the in-depth monitoring of mobile...2.1.6.If the number of websites in a Member State is...2.1.7.If the number of mobile applications in a Member State...2.2.Selection of the sample for websites 2.2.1.The selection of the sample for websites shall aim for...2.2.2.The sample shall cover websites from the different levels of...2.2.3.The sample shall include websites representing as much as possible...2.2.4.Member States shall consult national stakeholders, in particular organisations representing...2.3.Selection of the sample for mobile applications 2.3.1.The selection of the sample for mobile applications shall aim...2.3.2.Frequently downloaded mobile applications shall be considered in the sample....2.3.3.Different operating systems shall be taken into account when selecting...2.3.4.Only the most recent version of a mobile application shall...2.3.5.Member States shall consult national stakeholders, in particular organisations representing...2.4.Recurring sample 3.SAMPLING OF THE PAGES 3.1.For the purposes of this Annex, ‘page’ means a web...3.2.For the in-depth monitoring method the following pages and documents,...3.3.If any of the pages in the sample selected according...3.4.For the simplified monitoring method, a number of pages appropriate...1.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE REPORT 2.DESCRIPTION OF THE MONITORING ACTIVITIES 2.1.General information 2.2.Composition of the sample 2.3.Correlation with the standards, technical specifications and tools used for...3.OUTCOME OF THE MONITORING 3.1.Detailed outcome 3.2.Additional content (optional) 4.USE OF THE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE AND END-USER FEEDBACK 5.CONTENT RELATED TO ADDITIONAL MEASURES

X1Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1524

of 11 October 2018

establishing a monitoring methodology and the arrangements for reporting by Member States in accordance with Directive (EU) 2016/2102 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Directive (EU) 2016/2102 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies1, and in particular Article 8(2) and Article 8(6) thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

Directive (EU) 2016/2102 establishes common accessibility requirements in order to ensure that websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies are made more accessible by making them perceivable, operable, understandable and robust.

(2)

In order to help public sector bodies meet the accessibility requirements, the monitoring should also raise awareness and encourage learning in Member States. For that reason, and in order to enhance transparency, the overall results of the monitoring activities should be made publicly available in an accessible format.

(3)

In order to extract meaningful and comparable data, a structured presentation of the results of the monitoring activities where different clusters of public services and levels of administration are identified is necessary.

(4)

In order to facilitate the sampling of the websites and mobile applications to be monitored, Member States should be allowed to take measures to maintain up-to-date lists of the websites and mobile applications that belong to the scope of Directive (EU) 2016/2102.

(5)

In order to enhance the social impact of monitoring, a risk-based approach may be followed when selecting the sample by considering, among others, the influence of specific websites and mobile applications, the notifications received in the feedback mechanism, previous monitoring results as well as input from the enforcement body and contribution from national stakeholders.

(6)

As the technology for automated monitoring of mobile applications is foreseen to gradually improve, Member States should consider applying the simplified monitoring method, established in this Decision for websites, also to mobile applications, taking into account the effectiveness and affordability of the available tools.

(7)

The standards and technical specifications referred to in Article 6 of Directive (EU) 2016/2102 should form the basis of the methodology for monitoring.

(8)

In order to promote innovation, to avoid imposing barriers on the market and to ensure that the monitoring methodology is technology neutral, it should not define the specific tests to be applied for measuring the accessibility of websites and mobile applications. Instead, the monitoring methodology should be limited to establishing the requirements for the methods to verify compliance and to detect non-compliance with the accessibility requirements provided for in Article 4 of Directive (EU) 2016/2102.

(9)

If the provisions included in the legislation of the Member State exceed the requirements in the standards and technical specifications referred to in Article 6 of Directive (EU) 2016/2102, in order to enhance comparability of the monitoring, Member States should monitor and report in a way that provides distinguishable results regarding the compliance with the requirements in the standards and technical specifications referred to in Article 6 of Directive (EU) 2016/2102.

(10)

Comparability of the monitoring results should be ensured through the use of the monitoring methodology and reporting laid down in this Decision. In order to foster the sharing of best practices and to promote transparency, Member States should make public how they monitor, as well as make publicly available a mapping, in the form of a correlation table, demonstrating how the monitoring and the tests applied cover the requirements referred to in the standards and technical specifications provided for in Article 6 of Directive (EU) 2016/2102.

(11)

If Member States use the possibility provided for in Article 1(5) to exclude websites or mobile applications of schools, kindergartens or nurseries from the application of the Directive, they should use the relevant parts of the monitoring methodology to monitor the accessibility of the content of such websites and mobile applications, relating to essential online administrative functions.

(12)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the committee established by Article 11(1) of Directive (EU) 2016/2102,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Annotations: