Decision (EU) 2019/322 of the European Central Bank

of 31 January 2019

on delegation of the power to adopt decisions regarding supervisory powers granted under national law (ECB/2019/4)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions1, and in particular Article 4(1)(d) and (e), and Articles 4(3) and 9(1) thereof,
Having regard to Decision (EU) 2017/933 of the European Central Bank of 16 November 2016 on a general framework for delegating decision-making powers for legal instruments related to supervisory tasks (ECB/2016/40)2, and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

Within the framework of Article 6 of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013, the European Central Bank (ECB) carries out the exclusive task to supervise credit institutions with the aim to ensure a consistent application of supervisory standards, to foster financial stability and to ensure a level playing field.

(2)

Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 provides that the ECB must apply all relevant Union law, and where this Union law is composed of Directives, the national legislation transposing those Directives.

(3)

Pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013, for the purpose of carrying out the tasks conferred on it, the ECB has all the powers and obligations set out in Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 and all the powers and obligations which competent authorities have under the relevant Union law. The ECB's competence extends to the exercise of supervisory powers granted under national law that are not explicitly provided for in Union law as long as such powers fall within the ECB's tasks under Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 and underpin a supervisory function. The ECB, as the competent authority, is required to adopt a substantial number of decisions regarding supervisory powers granted under national law each year.

(4)
To facilitate the decision-making process a delegation decision is necessary regarding the adoption of such decisions. The Court of Justice of the European Union has recognised delegation of authority to be necessary to enable an institution required to adopt a considerable number of decisions to perform its duties. Similarly, it has recognised the need to ensure that decision-making bodies are able to function as a principle inherent to all institutional systems3.
(5)

Delegation of decision-making powers should be limited and proportionate, and the scope of the delegation should be clearly defined.

(6)

Decision (EU) 2017/933 (ECB/2016/40) specifies the procedure to be followed for adopting delegation decisions concerning supervision and the persons who may be delegated decision-making powers. That Decision does not affect the ECB's exercise of its supervisory tasks and is without prejudice to the Supervisory Board's competence to propose complete draft decisions to the Governing Council.

(7)
Where the criteria for the adoption of a delegated decision, as laid down in this Decision, are not met, decisions should be adopted in accordance with the non-objection procedure set out in Article 26(8) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 and further specified in Article 13g of Decision ECB/2004/24. Furthermore, the non-objection procedure should also be used if the heads of work units have concerns regarding the fulfilment of assessment criteria for the national powers decisions due to the complexity of the assessment.
(8)
ECB supervisory decisions may be subject to administrative review pursuant to Article 24 of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 and as further specified in Decision ECB/2014/165. In the event of such administrative review, the Supervisory Board should take into account the opinion of the Administrative Board of Review and submit a new draft decision to the Governing Council for adoption under the non-objection procedure,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: