- Latest available (Revised)
- Point in Time (01/01/2009)
- Original (As adopted by EU)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 of 7 December 2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, as regards the implementation of control procedures as well as cross-compliance in respect of rural development support measures (repealed)
When the UK left the EU, legislation.gov.uk published EU legislation that had been published by the EU up to IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.). On legislation.gov.uk, these items of legislation are kept up-to-date with any amendments made by the UK since then.
Legislation.gov.uk publishes the UK version. EUR-Lex publishes the EU version. The EU Exit Web Archive holds a snapshot of EUR-Lex’s version from IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.).
Version Superseded: 01/01/2010
Point in time view as at 01/01/2009.
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 (repealed), PART II.
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
1.Save as otherwise provided for in this Regulation, this Title shall apply to:
(a)support granted in accordance with Article 36 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005;
(b)support granted in accordance with Article 63(a) of that Regulation with regard to operations corresponding to measures defined under Axis 2.
However, this Title shall not apply to measures referred to in Article 36(a)(vi) and (b)(vi) and (vii) and in Article 39(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 as well as to measures under Article 36(b)(i) and (iii) of that Regulation as far as the establishment cost is concerned.
2.For the purposes of this Title the following definitions shall apply:
(a)‘area-related measure’ shall mean measures or sub-measures for which support is based on the size of the area declared;
(b)‘animal-related measure’ shall mean measures or sub-measures for which support is based on the number of animals declared.
Article 2(10), (22) and (23) and Articles 9, 18, 21 and 25(1) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 shall apply mutatis mutandis for the purpose of this Title.
Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 shall also apply mutatis mutandis. However, for the measures referred to in Articles 36(b)(iii), (iv) and (v) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the Member States may establish appropriate alternative systems to uniquely identify the land subject to support.
1.For all contracts entering into force after 1 January 2007, payment claims under area-related measures shall be submitted in accordance with the deadline set out in Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004. However, Member States may decide to apply this provision only as from the claim year 2008.
2.If a Member State applies the dispositions of Article 4(2), second sub paragraph, then the payment claim shall be deemed to be delivered in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004.
3.Articles 11(3), 12 and 15 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 shall apply mutatis mutandis to payment claims under this Title. Further to the information referred to in Article 12(1)(d) of that Regulation, the payment claim shall also contain the information set out in that provision with regard to non-agricultural land for which support is being claimed.
1.No payment for any measure or set of operations falling within the scope of this Title shall be made before the checks of this measure or set of operations with regard to eligibility criteria, as referred to in Section I of Chapter II, have been finalised.
However, Member States may decide, taking into account the risk of overpayment, to pay up to [F175 %] of the aid after finalisation of the administrative checks provided for in Article 11. The percentage of payment shall be the same for all beneficiaries of the measure or set of operations.
2.With regard to cross-compliance checks provided for in Section II of Chapter II, where such checks cannot be finalised before payment, any undue payments shall be recovered in accordance with Article 73 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004.
Textual Amendments
F1 Substituted by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1396/2007 of 28 November 2007 correcting Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, as regards the implementation of control procedures as well as cross-compliance in respect of rural development support measures.
1.Applications for support and subsequent payment claims shall be checked in a manner which ensures effective verification of compliance with the conditions for granting support.
2.The Member States shall define suitable methods and means for verifying the conditions for granting support for each support measure.
3.Member States shall make use of the integrated administration and control system provided for in Chapter 4 of Title II of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (hereinafter referred to as ‘IACS’).
4.Verification of the eligibility criteria shall consist of administrative and on-the-spot checks.
5.Respect of cross-compliance shall be verified through on-the-spot checks and where appropriate through administrative checks.
6.During the period covered by a commitment, parcels for which support is being granted may not be exchanged except in cases specifically provided for in the rural development programme.
1.Administrative checks shall be undertaken on all applications for support and payment claims, and shall cover all elements that it is possible and appropriate to control by administrative means. The procedures shall ensure the recording of control work undertaken, the results of the verification and the measures taken in respect of discrepancies.
2.The administrative checks shall include cross-checks wherever possible and appropriate, inter alia with data from the IACS. These cross-checks shall relate at least to parcels and livestock covered by a support measure in order to avoid any undue payments of aid.
3.Compliance with long-term commitments shall be checked.
4.Indications of irregularities resulting from cross-checks shall be followed-up by any other appropriate administrative procedure, and, where necessary, by an on-the-spot check.
5.Where applicable, administrative checks on eligibility shall take into account the results of verifications carried out by other services, bodies or organisations involved in controls of agricultural subsidies.
1.The total number of on-the-spot checks carried out each year shall cover at least 5 % of all beneficiaries subject to a commitment under one or more of the measures falling within the scope of this Title.
However, applicants found not to be eligible after administrative checks shall not form part of the overall number of beneficiaries referred to in the first subparagraph.
2.Article 26(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 shall apply to on-the-spot checks provided for in this Article.
3.The control sample referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 shall be selected in accordance with the criteria set out in Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004.
4.For any multiannual measures involving payments exceeding five years, the Member States may decide to halve the rate of control provided for in paragraph 1 after the fifth year of payment for a beneficiary.
Beneficiaries in respect of which the Member State makes use of the possibility set out in the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall not form part of the overall number of beneficiaries referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1.
On-the-spot checks under this Subsection shall be the subject of a control report to be established in accordance with Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004.
1.On-the-spot checks shall be spread over the year on the basis of an analysis of the risks presented by the different commitments under each rural development measure.
2.On-the-spot checks shall cover all the commitments and obligations of a beneficiary which can be checked at the time of the visit.
1.The Member States shall determine criteria and control methods that allow the controls of the different commitments and obligations of the beneficiary to satisfy the requirements of Article 48(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006(1).
2.With regard to controls on area-related measures, the on-the-spot checks shall be carried out in accordance with Articles 29, 30 and 32 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004.
However, for the measures set out in Articles 36(b)(iii), (iv) and (v) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the Member States may define appropriate tolerances, which shall in no case be greater than twice the tolerances set down in Article 30(1) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004.
3.With regard to controls on animal-related measures, the on-the-spot checks shall be carried out in accordance with Article 35 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004.
1.The basis for the calculation of the aid in respect of area-related measures shall be established in accordance with Article 50(1), (3) and (7) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004. For the purpose of this Article, the areas declared by a beneficiary which receive the same rate of aid shall be considered as forming one crop group.
2.If the area declared for payment under an area-related measure exceeds the area determined in accordance with Article 50(3) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004, the aid shall be calculated on the basis of the area determined reduced by twice the difference found if that difference is more than either 3 % or two hectares, but no more than 20 % of the area determined.
If the difference is more than 20 % of the area determined, no aid shall be granted for the area-related measure concerned.
3.If the area declared exceeds the area determined in accordance with Article 50(3) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 by more than 30 %, the beneficiary shall be excluded from receiving the aid he would have been entitled to pursuant to that Article for the calendar year in question for the measures concerned.
If the difference is more than 50 %, the beneficiary shall be additionally excluded from receiving aid up to an amount equal to the amount which corresponds to the difference between the area declared and the area determined in accordance with Article 50(3) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004.
[F24. By way of derogation from paragraph 2 and the first subparagraph of paragraph 3, for beneficiaries in Member States applying the single area payment scheme as provided for in Article 122 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (2) , and where the difference between the area declared and the area determined is more than 3 % but no more than 30 % of the area determined, the amount to be granted shall be reduced, as regards aid applications for the calendar year 2009, by twice the difference found.
Where the difference is more than 30 % of the area determined, no aid shall be granted for calendar year 2009.]
5.Where differences between the area declared and the area determined in accordance with Article 50(3) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 result from irregularities committed intentionally, the beneficiary shall be excluded from the aid he would have been entitled to pursuant to that Article for the EAFRD year in question for the area-related measure concerned.
6.The amount resulting from the exclusions provided for in the second subparagraph of paragraph 3 and in paragraph 5 shall be off-set against aid payments under any of the support measures under Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 or Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 to which the beneficiary concerned is entitled in the context of applications he lodges in the course of the three calendar years following the calendar year of the finding. If the amount cannot be fully off-set against those payments, the outstanding balance shall be cancelled.
Textual Amendments
F2 Substituted by Commission Regulation (EC) No 484/2009 of 9 June 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, as regards the implementation of control procedures as well as cross-compliance in respect of rural development support measures.
1.The basis for the calculation of the aid in respect of animal-related measures shall be established in accordance with Article 57(2), (3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004.
2.Any reductions or exclusions to be applied in the case of overdeclaration of bovine animals or of ovine or caprine animals respectively shall be calculated in accordance with Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004.
Support measures in relation to bovine animals and those relating to ovine or caprine animals shall be treated separately.
3.By way of derogation from the second subparagraph of Article 59(2) and the second subparagraph of Article 59(4) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004, the amount resulting from the exclusion shall be off-set against aid payments under any of the support measures under Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 to which the beneficiary concerned is entitled in the context of applications he lodges in the course of the three calendar years following the calendar year of the finding. If the amount cannot be fully off-set against those payments, the outstanding balance shall be cancelled.
4.In respect of overdeclarations concerning animals other than those referred to in paragraph 2, the Member State shall fix an appropriate system of reductions and exclusions.
1.In case any of the commitments attached to the granting of the aid, other than those related to the size of area or number of animals declared, are not respected, the aid claimed shall be reduced or refused.
2.The Member State shall determine the amount of the reduction of the aid, in particular, on the basis of the severity, extent and permanence of the non-respect found.
The severity of a non-respect shall depend, in particular, on the importance of the consequences of the non-respect taking into account the objectives pursued by the criteria which have not been respected.
The extent of a non-respect shall depend, in particular, on the effect of the non-respect on the operation as a whole.
Whether a non-compliance is of permanence shall depend, in particular, on the length of time for which the effect lasts or the potential for terminating those effects by reasonable means.
3.In case the non-respect results from irregularities committed intentionally, the beneficiary shall be excluded from the measure in question for the EAFRD year concerned as well as for the following EAFRD year.
4.The reductions and exclusions provided for in this Article shall apply without prejudice to any additional penalties provided for under national rules.
1.Without prejudice to Article 51(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, ‘Cross-compliance’ shall mean the mandatory requirements referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 51(1) of that Regulation and the minimum requirements for fertiliser and plant protection product use referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 51(1) of that Regulation.
2.Articles 3(2) and 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and Article 2(2), (2a) and (31) to (36) as well as Articles 9, 41, 42, 43, 46, 47 and 48 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 shall apply with regard to controls on the respect of cross-compliance.
1.The competent control authority shall, with regard to the requirements or standards for which it is responsible, carry out on-the-spot checks on at least 1 % of all beneficiaries submitting payment claims under Article 36(a)(i) to (v) and (b)(i), (iv) and (v) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.
2.The second subparagraph of Article 44(1) and Article 44(2) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 shall apply.
1.Article 45(1) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 shall apply as regards the selection of the control sample referred to in Article 20 of this Regulation.
2.The competent control authority shall, with regard to the requirements or standards for which it is responsible, select the beneficiaries to be checked in accordance with Article 20 by selecting the sample from the sample of beneficiaries which were already selected pursuant to Article 12 and to whom the relevant requirements or standards apply.
3.By way of derogation from paragraph 2, the competent control authority may, with regard to the requirements or standards for which it is responsible, select a control sample of 1 % of all beneficiaries submitting payment claims under Article 36(a)(i) to (v) and (b)(i), (iv) and (v) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 and who are under the obligation to respect at least one of the requirements or standards.
1.Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and Article 2(2), (2a) and (31) to (36), Article 41 and Article 65(2) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 shall apply with regard to reductions or exclusions to be applied following the determination of non-compliances.
2.Where more than one paying agency is responsible in the context of the management of the different support measures under Article 36(a)(i) to (v) and (b)(i), (iv) and (v) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the Member States shall take the appropriate measures to ensure the appropriate application of the provisions of this Subsection, in particular that one rate of reduction is applied to the entirety of those payments applied for by the beneficiary.
Without prejudice to Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, where a non-compliance is determined, a reduction shall be applied on the overall amount of aid under Article 36(a)(i) to (v) and (b)(iv) and (v) of that Regulation that has been, or has to be, granted to the beneficiary concerned following payment claims he has submitted or will submit in the course of the calendar year of the finding.
Where the non-compliance is due to negligence of the beneficiary, the reduction shall be calculated in accordance with the rules set out in Article 66 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004.
In the case of intentional non-compliance, the reduction shall be calculated in accordance with Article 67 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004.
Where there is an accumulation of reductions, reductions shall be applied firstly for late submission in accordance with Article 21 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004, then in accordance with Articles 16 or 17 of this Regulation, then in accordance with Article 18 and finally in accordance with Articles 22 and 23.
This Title shall apply to:
the support measures set out in Articles 20 and 52 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005;
the support measures set out in Articles 36(a)(vi), (b)(vi), (b)(vii) and 39(5) of that Regulation and in Articles 36(b) (i) and (iii) of that Regulation as far as the establishment costs are concerned;
support granted in accordance with Article 63(a) and (b) of that Regulation with regard to operations corresponding to measures provided for in points (a) and (b) of this Article.
1.Administrative checks shall be carried out on all applications for support or payment claims, and shall cover all elements that it is possible and appropriate to control by administrative means. The procedures shall require the recording of control work undertaken, the results of the verification and the measures taken in respect of discrepancies.
2.Administrative checks on applications for support shall in particular include a verification of:
(a)the eligibility of the operation for which support is requested;
(b)the respect of the selection criteria set out in the rural development programme;
(c)the compliance of the operation for which support is requested with applicable national and Community rules on, in particular, and where relevant, public procurement, State aid and the other appropriate obligatory standards established by national legislation or established in the rural development programme;
(d)the reasonableness of the costs proposed, which shall be evaluated using a suitable evaluation system, such as reference costs, a comparison of different offers or an evaluation committee;
(e)the reliability of the applicant, with reference to any previous co-financed operations undertaken since 2000.
3.Administrative checks on payment claims shall include in particular, and as far as this is appropriate for the claiming question, a verification of:
(a)the delivery of the products and services co-financed;
(b)the reality of expenditure claimed;
(c)the completed operation compared with the operation for which the application for support was submitted and granted.
4.Administrative checks relating to investment operations shall include at least one visit to the operation supported or the investment site to verify the realisation of the investment.
However, Member States may decide not to carry out such visits for smaller investments, or where they consider that the risk that the conditions for receiving aid are not fulfilled, or that the reality of the investment has not been respected, is low. That decision and its justification shall be recorded.
5.Payments by beneficiaries shall be supported by invoices and documents proving payment. Where this cannot be done, payments shall be supported by documents of equivalent probative value.
6.Administrative checks shall include procedures to avoid irregular double financing with other Community or national schemes and with other programming periods. Where financing from other sources exists these checks shall ensure that the total aid received does not breach the maximum permissible aid ceilings.
7.For support relating to food quality schemes recognised by Member States, as provided for in Article 32 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, paying agencies may, where appropriate, make use of evidence received from other services, bodies or organisations to verify the respect of eligibility criteria. However, they must have assurance that the service, body or organisation is operating to a standard sufficient to control compliance with the eligibility criteria.
1.Member States shall organise on-the-spot checks on approved operations on an appropriate sampling basis. These shall be, as far as is possible, carried out before the final payment is made for a project.
2.The expenditure controlled shall represent at least 4 % of the public expenditure that has been declared to the Commission each year, and at least 5 % of the public expenditure declared to the Commission over the whole programming period.
3.The sample of approved operations to be checked in accordance with paragraph 1 shall take into account in particular:
(a)the need to check an appropriate mix of types and sizes of operations;
(b)any risk factors which have been identified following national or Community checks;
(c)the need to maintain a balance between the axes and measures.
4.The results of the on-the-spot checks shall be evaluated to establish whether any problems encountered are of a systemic character, entailing a risk for other similar operations, beneficiaries or other bodies. The evaluation shall also identify the causes of such situations, any further examination which may be required and the necessary corrective and preventive action.
5.Advance notice of on-the-spot checks may be given, provided that the purpose of the control is not jeopardised. If the advance notice exceeds 48 hours then it should be limited to the minimum necessary, depending on the nature of the measure and the operation being co-financed.
1.Through the on-the-spot checks, the Member States shall endeavour to verify the following:
(a)that the payments made to the beneficiary can be supported by accounting or other documents held by the bodies of firms carrying out the operations supported;
(b)for an adequate number of expenditure items, that the nature and timing of the relevant expenditure comply with Community provisions and correspond to the approved specifications of the operation and the works actually executed or services delivered;
(c)that the use or intended use of the operation is consistent with the use described in the application for Community support;
(d)that the publicly funded operations have been implemented in accordance with Community rules and policies, especially the rules on public tendering and relevant mandatory standards established by national legislation or established in the rural development programme.
2.The on-the-spot checks shall cover all the commitments and obligations of a beneficiary which can be checked at the time of the visit.
3.Except in exceptional circumstances, duly recorded and explained by the national authorities, the on-the-spot checks shall include a visit to the operation or, if the operation is intangible, to the operation promoter.
4.Only checks meeting the full requirements of this Article may be counted towards the achievement of the control rate set out in Article 27(2).
1.For applications for support under Articles 23 and 34 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the administrative checks shall additionally include those referred to in Article 11(2) of this Regulation.
2.For the measure provided for in Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, Member States may dispense with on-the-spot checks after the first payment of the support, provided that administrative checks, including inter alia appropriate cross-checks, in particular with the information contained in the electronic database referred to in Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, provide the necessary assurance of legality and regularity of payments.
1.Ex-post checks shall be carried out on investment operations that are still subject to commitments pursuant to Article 72(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 or detailed in the rural development programme.
2.The objective of the ex-post checks shall be to:
(a)verify the respect of Article 72(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005;
(b)verify the reality and finality of payments made by the beneficiary, except in the case of contributions in kind or standard costs;
(c)ensure that the same investment has not been financed in an irregular manner from different national or Community sources.
3.The ex-post checks shall cover each year at least 1 % of eligible expenditure for operations referred to in paragraph 1 for which the final payment has been made. They shall be carried out within 12 months of the end of the relevant EAFRD year.
4.The ex-post checks shall be based on an analysis of the risks and financial impact of different operations, groups of operations or measures.
The controllers for the ex-post checks shall not have been involved in pre-payment checks of the same investment operation.
1.Payments shall be calculated on the basis of what is found to be eligible.
The Member State shall examine the payment claim received from the beneficiary, and establish the amounts that are eligible for support. It shall establish:
(a)the amount that is payable to the beneficiary based solely on the payment claim;
(b)the amount that is payable to the beneficiary after an examination of the eligibility of the payment claim.
If the amount established pursuant to point (a) exceeds the amount established pursuant to point (b) by more than 3 %, a reduction shall be applied to the amount established pursuant to point (b). The amount of the reduction shall be difference between those two amounts.
However, no reduction shall be applied if the beneficiary can demonstrate that he/she is not at fault for the inclusion of the ineligible amount. The reductions shall be applied mutatis mutandis to ineligible expenditure identified during checks under Article 28 and 30.
2.If a beneficiary is found to have intentionally made a false declaration the operation in question shall be excluded from support of the EAFRD and any amounts already paid for that operation shall be recovered. Moreover, the beneficiary shall be excluded from receiving support under the same measure for the EAFRD year in question and for the following EAFRD year.
3.The penalties provided for in paragraphs 2 and 3 shall apply without prejudice to additional penalties provided for under national rules.
In the case of expenditure incurred under Article 63(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the Member State shall organise controls in conformity with this Title. Those controls shall be carried out by persons independent from the local action group concerned.
1.In the case of expenditure incurred under Article 63(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the administrative checks referred to in Article 26 of this Regulation may be carried out by local action groups under a formal delegation. However, the Member State remains responsible for verifying that local action groups have the administrative and control capacity to undertake that work.
2.The Member State shall implement an appropriate system of supervision of the local action groups. This shall include regular controls of the operations of the local action groups, including bookkeeping checks and sample reperformance of administrative checks.
See page 15 of this Official Journal.
Textual Amendments
F2 Substituted by Commission Regulation (EC) No 484/2009 of 9 June 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, as regards the implementation of control procedures as well as cross-compliance in respect of rural development support measures.
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As adopted by EU): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was first adopted in the EU. No changes have been applied to the text.
Point in Time: This becomes available after navigating to view revised legislation as it stood at a certain point in time via Advanced Features > Show Timeline of Changes or via a point in time advanced search.
Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.
Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
This timeline shows the different versions taken from EUR-Lex before exit day and during the implementation period as well as any subsequent versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation.
The dates for the EU versions are taken from the document dates on EUR-Lex and may not always coincide with when the changes came into force for the document.
For any versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation the date will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. For further information see our guide to revised legislation on Understanding Legislation.
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: