CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER II GENERAL REQUIREMENTS CHAPTER III SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CHAPTER IV TRANSITIONAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS
PART I GENERAL INFORMATION 1.Name and address of the applicant (company or institute). 2.Name, qualification and experience of the responsible scientist(s) and contact...3.Designation and specification of the genetically modified plant and its...4.Scope of the application: 5.Unique identifier. 6.Where applicable, a detailed description of the method of production...7.Where appropriate, the conditions for the placing on the market...8.Where applicable, the status of the food or feed or...PART II SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION 1.HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERISATION 1.1.Information relating to the recipient or (where appropriate) parental plants...(a)Complete name: (b)Geographical distribution and cultivation of the plant within the Union;...(c)Information on the recipient or parental plants relevant to their...(d)Data on the past and present use of the recipient...(e)Additional information relating to the recipient or parental plants required...1.2.Molecular Characterisation 1.2.1.Information relating to the genetic modification 1.2.1.1.Description of the methods used for the genetic modification 1.2.1.2.Nature and source of vector used 1.2.1.3.Source of donor nucleic acid(s) used for transformation, size and...1.2.2.Information relating to the genetically modified plant 1.2.2.1.General description of the trait(s) and characteristics which have been...1.2.2.2.Information on the sequences actually inserted/deleted 1.2.2.3.Information on the expression of the insert(s) 1.2.2.4.Genetic stability of the insert and phenotypic stability of the...1.2.2.5.Potential risk associated with horizontal gene transfer 1.2.3.Additional information relating to the genetically modified plant required for...1.2.3.1.Information on how the genetically modified plant differs from the...1.2.3.2.Any change to the ability of the genetically modified plant...1.2.4.Conclusions of the molecular characterisation 1.3.Comparative analysis 1.3.1.Choice of the conventional counterpart and additional comparators 1.3.2.Experimental design and statistical analysis of data from field trials...1.3.2.1.Description of the protocols for the experimental design 1.3.2.2.Statistical analysis 1.3.3.Selection of material and compounds for analysis 1.3.4.Comparative analysis of composition 1.3.5.Comparative analysis of agronomic and phenotypic characteristics 1.3.6.Effects of processing 1.3.7.Conclusion 1.4.Toxicology 1.4.1.Testing of newly expressed proteins 1.4.2.Testing of new constituents other than proteins 1.4.3.Information on natural food and feed constituents 1.4.4.Testing of the whole genetically modified food or feed 1.4.4.1.90-day feeding study in rodents 1.4.4.2.Animal studies with respect to reproductive, developmental or chronic toxicity...1.4.4.3.Other animal studies to examine the safety and the characteristics...1.4.5.Conclusion of the toxicological assessment 1.5.Allergenicity 1.5.1.Assessment of allergenicity of the newly expressed protein 1.5.2.Assessment of allergenicity of the whole genetically modified plant 1.5.3.Conclusion of the allergenicity assessment 1.6.Nutritional assessment 1.6.1.Nutritional assessment of the genetically modified food 1.6.2.Nutritional assessment of the genetically modified feed 1.6.3.Conclusion of the nutritional assessment 2.EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT — ANTICIPATED INTAKE OR EXTENT OF USE 3.RISK CHARACTERISATION 4.POST-MARKET MONITORING ON THE GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD OR FEED 5.ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 6.ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN 7.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE SAFETY OF THE GENETICALLY MODIFIED...PART III CARTAGENA PROTOCOL PART IV LABELLING PART V METHODS OF DETECTION, SAMPLING AND IDENTIFICATION AND REFERENCE MATERIAL PART VI ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED FOR GENETICALLY MODIFIED PLANTS AND/OR FOOD OR FEED CONTAINING OR CONSISTING OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED PLANTS PART VII SUMMARY OF APPLICATIONS 1.GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1.Details of application (a)Member State of application (b)Application number (c)Name of the product (commercial and any other names) (d)Date of acknowledgement of valid application 1.2.Applicant (a)Name of applicant (b)Address of applicant (c)Name and address of the representative of the applicant established...1.3.Scope of the application (a)Genetically modified food (b)Genetically modified feed (c)Genetically modified plants for food and feed use 1.4.Is the product or the uses of the associated plant...1.5.Has the genetically modified plant been notified under Part B...1.6.Has the genetically modified plant or derived products been previously...1.7.Has the product been subject to an application and/or authorised...1.8.General description of the product (a)Name of the recipient or parental plant and the intended...(b)Types of products planned to be placed on the market...(c)Intended use of the product and types of users (d)Any specific instructions and recommendations for use, storage and handling,...(e)If applicable, geographical areas within the Union to which the...(f)Any type of environment to which the product is unsuited...(g)Any proposed packaging requirements (h)Any proposed labelling requirements in addition to those required by...(i)Estimated potential demand (j)Unique identifier in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 65/2004. 1.9.Measures suggested by the applicant to take in the case...2.INFORMATION RELATING TO THE RECIPIENT OR (WHERE APPROPRIATE) PARENTAL PLANTS...2.1.Complete name (a)Family name (b)Genus (c)Species (d)Subspecies (e)Cultivar/breeding line (f)Common name 2.2.Geographical distribution and cultivation of the plant, including the distribution...2.3.Information concerning reproduction (for environmental safety aspects) (a)Mode(s) of reproduction (b)Specific factors affecting reproduction (c)Generation time 2.4.Sexual compatibility with other cultivated or wild plant species (for...2.5.Survivability (for environmental safety aspects) (a)Ability to form structures for survival or dormancy (b)Specific factors affecting survivability 2.6.Dissemination (for environmental safety aspects) (a)Ways and extent of dissemination (b)Specific factors affecting dissemination 2.7.Geographical distribution within the Union of the sexually compatible species...2.8.In the case of plant species not normally grown in...2.9.Other potential interactions, relevant to the genetically modified plant, of...3.MOLECULAR CHARACTERISATION 3.1.Information relating to the genetic modification (a)Description of the methods used for the genetic modification (b)Nature and source of the vector used (c)Source of donor nucleic acid(s) used for transformation, size and...3.2.Information relating to the genetically modified plant 3.2.1.Description of the trait(s) and characteristics which have been introduced...3.2.2.Information on the nucleic acid(s) sequences actually inserted or deleted...(a)The copy number of all detectable inserts, both complete and...(b)In the case of deletion(s), size and function of the...(c)Subcellular location(s) of insert(s) (nucleus, chloroplasts, mitochondria, or maintained in...(d)The organisation of the inserted genetic material at the insertion...(e)In the case of modifications other than insertion or deletion,...3.2.3.Information on the expression of the insert (a)Information on developmental expression of the insert during the life...(b)Parts of the plant where the insert is expressed 3.2.4.Genetic stability of the insert and phenotypic stability of the...3.2.5.Information (for environmental safety aspects) on how the genetically modified...(a)Mode(s) and/or rate of reproduction (b)Dissemination (c)Survivability (d)Other differences 3.2.6.Any change to the ability of the genetically modified plant...(a)Plant to bacteria gene transfer (b)Plant to plant gene transfer 4.COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 4.1.Choice of the conventional counterpart and additional comparators 4.2.Experimental design and statistical analysis of data from field trials...4.3.Selection of material and compounds for analysis 4.4.Comparative analysis of agronomic and phenotypic characteristics 4.5.Effect of processing 5.TOXICOLOGY (a)Toxicological testing of newly expressed proteins (b)Testing of new constituents other than proteins (c)Information on natural food or feed constituents (d)Testing of the whole genetically modified food and feed 6.ALLERGENICITY (a)Assessment of allergenicity of the newly expressed protein (b)Assessment of allergenicity of the whole genetically modified plant 7.NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT (a)Nutritional assessment of the genetically modified food (b)Nutritional assessment of the genetically modified feed 8.EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT — ANTICIPATED INTAKE/EXTENT OF USE 9.RISK CHARACTERISATION 10.POST-MARKET MONITORING ON THE GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD OR FEED 11.ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 11.1.Mechanism of interaction between the genetically modified plant and target...11.2.Potential changes in the interactions of the genetically modified plant...(a)Persistence and invasiveness (b)Selective advantage or disadvantage (c)Potential for gene transfer (d)Interactions between the genetically modified plant and target organisms (e)Interactions of the genetically modified plant with non-target organisms (f)Effects on human health (g)Effects on animal health (h)Effects on biogeochemical processes (i)Impacts of the specific cultivation, management and harvesting techniques 11.3.Potential interactions with the abiotic environment 11.4.Risk characterisation 12.ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN (a)General (risk assessment, background information) (b)Interplay between environmental risk assessment and monitoring (c)Case-specific genetically modified plant monitoring (approach, strategy, method and analysis)...(d)General surveillance of the impact of the genetically modified plant...(e)Reporting the results of monitoring 13.DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE GENETICALLY MODIFIED PLANT 14.INFORMATION RELATING TO PREVIOUS RELEASES OF THE GENETICALLY MODIFIED PLANT...14.1.History of previous releases of the genetically modified plant notified...(a)Notification number (b)Conclusions of post-release monitoring (c)Results of the release with respect to any risk to...14.2.History of previous releases of the genetically modified plant carried...(a)Release country (b)Authority overseeing the release (c)Release site (d)Aim of the release (e)Duration of the release (f)Aim of post-releases monitoring (g)Duration of post-releases monitoring (h)Conclusions of post-release monitoring (i)Results of the release with respect to any risk to...I.INTRODUCTION 1.DEFINITIONS 2.SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS 2.1.Insertion of marker genes and other nucleic acid(s) sequences not...2.2.Risk assessment of genetically modified food and feed containing stacked...II.SCIENTIFIC REQUIREMENTS 1.HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERISATION 1.1.Information relating to the recipient or (where appropriate) parental plants...1.1.1.The applicant shall provide comprehensive information relating to the recipient...1.1.2.For the purposes referred to in point 1.1.1, the applicant...1.2.Molecular Characterisation 1.2.1.Information relating to the genetic modification 1.2.1.1.Description of the methods used for the genetic modification 1.2.1.2.Nature and source of vector used 1.2.1.3.Source of nucleic acid(s) used for transformation, size and intended...1.2.2.Information relating to the genetically modified plant 1.2.2.1.General description of the trait(s) and characteristics which have been...1.2.2.2.Information on the sequences actually inserted/deleted 1.2.2.3.Information on the expression of the insert(s) 1.2.2.4.Genetic stability of the insert and phenotypic stability of the...1.2.2.5.Potential risk associated with horizontal gene transfer 1.2.3.Conclusions of the molecular characterisation 1.3.Comparative analysis 1.3.1.Choice of the conventional counterpart and additional comparators 1.3.2.Experimental design and statistical analysis of data from field trials...1.3.2.1.Description of the protocols for the experimental design (a)Principles of experimental design (b)Specific protocols for experimental design 1.3.2.2.Statistical analysis 1.3.3.Selection of material and compounds for analysis 1.3.4.Comparative analysis of composition 1.3.5.Comparative analysis of agronomic and phenotypic characteristics 1.3.6.Effects of processing 1.3.7.Conclusion 1.4.Toxicology 1.4.1.Testing of newly expressed proteins 1.4.2.Testing of new constituents other than proteins 1.4.3.Information on altered levels of food and feed constituents 1.4.4.Testing of the whole genetically modified food and feed 1.4.4.1.90-day feeding study in rodents with whole genetically modified food/feed...1.4.4.2.Animal studies with respect to reproductive and developmental toxicity testing...1.4.4.3.Other animal studies to examine the safety and the characteristics...1.4.4.4.Interpretation of relevance of animal studies 1.4.5.Conclusion of the toxicological assessment 1.5.Allergenicity 1.5.1.Assessment of allergenicity of the newly expressed protein 1.5.2.Assessment of allergenicity of the genetically modified food or feed...1.5.3.Adjuvanticity 1.5.4.Conclusion of the allergenicity assessment 1.6.Nutritional assessment 1.6.1.Objectives of the nutritional assessment 1.6.2.Points to consider for the nutritional assessment of genetically modified...1.6.3.Nutritional studies of genetically modified food 1.6.4.Nutritional studies of genetically modified feed 1.6.5.Conclusion of the nutritional assessment 1.7.Standardised guidelines for toxicity tests 2.EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT — ANTICIPATED INTAKE/EXTENT OF USE 3.RISK CHARACTERISATION 3.1.Introduction 3.2.Issues to be considered for risk characterisation 3.2.1.Molecular characterisation 3.2.2.Comparative analysis 3.2.3.Food and feed safety in relation to intake 3.3.The result of risk characterisation 1.INTRODUCTION 1.For the purposes of implementing Article 5(3)(i) and (j) and...2.The applicant must include information on the method as such...3.The applicant shall also consider further guidance and information about...2.DEFINITIONS 3.METHOD VALIDATION 3.1.Information about the method A.The method(s) shall refer to all the methodological steps needed...B.The applicant shall be allowed to refer to validated protocols,...C.The applicant shall demonstrate that the method(s) fulfils the following...D.For the purpose of implementing Articles 5(3)(i) and 17(3)(i) of...E.The applicant shall provide a complete and detailed description of...3.2.Information about the method testing carried out by the applicant...A.The applicant shall provide all the available and relevant data...B.The applicant shall ensure that the provided information demonstrates the...C.The applicant shall provide the following information about the method...D.The applicant shall, in addition to the information required under...3.3.Samples of the food and feed and their control samples...4.CERTIFIED REFERENCE MATERIAL

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2013

of 3 April 2013

on applications for authorisation of genetically modified food and feed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Regulations (EC) No 641/2004 and (EC) No 1981/2006

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed1, and in particular Articles 5(7), 11(5), 17(7) and 23(5) thereof,

After consulting the European Food Safety Authority,

Whereas:

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 lays down Union procedures for the authorisation and supervision of genetically modified food and feed, including rules for the labelling of such food and feed. That Regulation provides for a scientific evaluation to be carried out on the risks that the genetically modified food or feed may present for human and animal health and, as the case may be, for the environment. It also provides that a genetically modified food or feed must not mislead the consumer or the user and must not differ from the food or feed which it is intended to replace to such an extent that its normal consumption would be nutritionally disadvantageous for humans or animals.

(2)

Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 provides, in particular, that applications for authorisation are to adequately and sufficiently demonstrate that the genetically modified food and feed satisfy the requirements laid down in that Regulation, in respect of their proposed uses.

(3)

In the interest of consistency of Union legislation, certain definitions laid down in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety2 should also apply to this Regulation.

(4)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 641/20043 on detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 provides for certain detailed rules concerning applications for authorisation submitted in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. To facilitate the preparation of applications and ensure that they contain all the information needed for their assessment, it is necessary to provide for more comprehensive and systematic rules concerning applications for authorisation, which should also be specific to each type of genetically modified organisms (GMO), namely plants, animals and micro-organisms.

(5)

The rules laid down in this Regulation should only cover applications concerning genetically modified plants for food or feed uses, food or feed containing or consisting of genetically modified plants and food or feed produced from such plants. Genetically modified plants, for which sufficient experience is available to date, constitute the vast majority of current applications.

(6)

The rules laid down in this Regulation should specify the general requirements for the presentation and preparation of applications, namely requirements to provide general and scientific information, including methods for detection, and identification, as well as reference material so as to ensure that applications comply with the conditions laid down in Articles 5, 17 and 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.

(7)

The applicant should also take into consideration the scientific information to be provided in the application as regards the environmental risk assessment of GMOs or food and feed containing or consisting of GMOs, as set out in the principles for the environmental risk assessment in Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC4, as well as the applicable guidance published by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in this regard.

(8)

In addition to the general requirements for the presentation and preparation of applications, it is appropriate to provide for specific rules to ensure that the scientific information required in the application adequately and sufficiently demonstrates that the genetically modified food or feed satisfy the requirements laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, in respect of their proposed uses.

(9)

These rules should therefore provide for a set of studies that should be included in all applications, as well as the test methods to be followed to perform such studies, whilst taking into account relevant international standards, such as the guideline of the Codex Alimentarius for the conduct of safety assessment of foods derived from the recombinant-DNA plant5.

(10)

In accordance with the applicable guidance of the EFSA6, the safety assessment of the genetically modified food or feed should include studies related to new components resulting from the genetic modification, the molecular characterisation of the genetically modified plant, the comparative analysis of the composition and the phenotype of the genetically modified plant compared to its conventional counterpart. Depending on the characteristics of the genetically modified plant and on the outcome of that first set of studies, the EFSA guidance indicates that it may be necessary to perform additional studies. In that respect, the EFSA considers that notwithstanding its limitations, a 90-day feeding study in rodents with whole food or feed is, when justified, the primary additional study to address uncertainties identified in the course of the safety assessment.

(11)

It has, however, not been proved possible to define with the necessary precision the level of uncertainties which would require the submission of 90-day feeding studies. In addition, some food and feed assessment bodies of Member States are of the opinion that such study should be performed in all applications for genetically modified plants containing single transformation events. Considering these diverging views, as well as to improve consumer confidence, such studies should be, for the time being, requested in all applications related to genetically modified plants with single transformation events and, where appropriate, on genetically modified plants containing stacked transformation events.

(12)

Studies to demonstrate that a genetically modified food or feed fulfils the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 involving the use of laboratory animals should be carried out in accordance with Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 regarding the protection of the animals used for scientific purposes7, and should be kept to a minimum while ensuring an adequate demonstration of the safety of the genetically modified food or feed. The current uncertainties in relation to the need and design of 90-day feeding trials will be addressed by a large research project under the 2012 work programme of Theme 2 ‘Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, and Biotechnologies’ of the seventh Framework Programme for Research (FP7). The requirements regarding animal feeding trials in the context of GMO risk assessments should be reviewed in the light of the outcome of this project expected to be available by the end of 2015 at the latest. Other credible scientific knowledge which might be available at that time should also be taken into account.

(13)

While the rules laid down in this Regulation should be valid for all applications for genetically modified plants, the type and necessity of the studies to evaluate the characteristics and safety of genetically modified food or feed subject to an application may vary, depending on the nature of the genetic modification or of the product. For example, genetic modifications which have negligible impact on the composition of a genetically modified food or feed or highly refined products that may be proven to be identical to products produced from the conventional counterpart require different studies than a product resulting from complex genetic modification aiming to modify its nutritional characteristics.

(14)

The requirements laid down in this Regulation regarding the studies which have to be included in an application for authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 should not prevent the EFSA to request, where appropriate, the applicant to supplement the particulars accompanying the application in accordance with Articles 6(2) and 18(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.

(15)

In order to ensure that studies are of high quality and documented in a transparent way, it is essential that they are performed under appropriate quality assurance systems and raw data should be provided in all cases and be in a suitable electronic format. Toxicological studies should be performed in accordance with the quality assurance principles laid down by Directive 2004/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on the harmonisation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of the principles of good laboratory practice and the verification of their applications for tests on chemical substances8. If such studies are carried out outside the Union, they should follow the state-of-the-art OECD Principles on Good Laboratory Practice (GLP). With regard to studies other than toxicological studies, they should be conducted under ISO or GLP standards.

(16)

It is also necessary to define the requirements regarding the submission of additional information related to the safety of the GMO and scientific peer-reviewed literature related to the potential effects on health and on the environment of the products covered by the application.

(17)

During the process of the genetic modification of plants and other organisms, marker genes are often used to facilitate the selection and identification of genetically modified cells, containing the gene of interest inserted into the genome of the host organism, among the vast majority of untransformed cells. Such marker genes should be carefully selected. In addition, it is now possible to develop GMOs without the use of antibiotic resistance marker genes. Against this background and in accordance with Article 4(2) of Directive 2001/18/EC, the applicant should therefore aim to develop GMOs without the use of antibiotic resistance marker genes.

(18)

The harvest of segregating genetically modified plants (segregating crops) containing stacked transformation events contains various subcombinations of transformation events. In addition, current control procedures do not allow identifying the origin of combinations of transformation events. Therefore, in order to ensure that authorisations are coherent with the products of which the placing on the market is unavoidable and for the feasibility of controls, the applications for genetically modified food and feed from segregating crops should include all subcombinations independently of their origin and not yet authorised.

(19)

Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 provides that a proposal for post-market monitoring of the use of the genetically modified food or feed shall only be submitted by the applicant where it is appropriate. It is therefore necessary to set out the conditions under which such a proposal should, according to the outcome of the risk assessment, accompany the application. Post-market monitoring should only be considered in cases where, notwithstanding the fact that the safety of genetically modified food and feed has been demonstrated, it is appropriate to confirm the expected consumption, the application of conditions of uses or identified effects. This is for example the case when the genetically modified food or feed has altered nutritional composition or when that its nutritional value differs from the conventional food or feed that it would replace or when there is a likelihood of increased allergenicity due to the genetic modification.

(20)

This Regulation should take account of the international trade commitments of the Union and of the requirements of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity (the Cartagena Protocol), approved by Council Decision 2002/628/EC of 25 June 2002 concerning the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety9 as well as the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1946/2003 of 15 July 2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on transboundary movements of genetically modified organisms10.

(21)

In order to ensure that test methods included in the application are adequate to demonstrate that the food or feed complies with the requirements for authorisation set out in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, they should be carried out in accordance with the present Regulation, or internationally agreed guidelines such as those described by the OECD, when available. To ensure that applications for renewal meet the same standards as regards tests methods, it is appropriate that these requirements also apply to application for renewal of authorisation of GM food and feed.

(22)

In order to provide an accurate designation of the GM food or feed subject to an application under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, applications should include proposals for a unique identifier for each GMO concerned in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 65/2004 of 14 January 2004 establishing a system for the development and assignment of unique identifiers for genetically modified organisms11.

(23)

This Regulation replaces certain provisions of Regulation (EC) No 641/2004 as regards genetically modified plants for food or feed uses, food or feed containing or consisting of genetically modified plants and food or feed produced from genetically modified plants. However, Regulation (EC) No 641/2004 should continue to apply as regards other types of genetically modified products, namely genetically modified animals and genetically modified micro-organisms. Moreover, certain provisions of that Regulation are obsolete. Regulation (EC) No 641/2004 should therefore be amended accordingly.

(24)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1981/2006 of 22 December 2006 on detailed rules for the implementation of Article 32 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the Community reference laboratory for genetically modified organisms12 should be amended to include references to this Regulation.

(25)

Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 provides that the Commission is to consult the EFSA before establishing implementing rules with regard to the applications for authorisation under that Regulation. The EFSA has been consulted on those rules accordingly.

(26)

This Regulation has been drawn up on the basis of current scientific and technical knowledge. Therefore, the Commission should monitor any developments in this field and the publication of new or additional guidance by the EFSA.

(27)

This Regulation applies to applications submitted after its entry into force. It is necessary to provide for transitional measures in order to enable the applicants to comply with those rules and for the current applications or the applications close to being submitted to proceed without unnecessary delays.

(28)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: