Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (Text with EEA relevance)

Print Options
PrintThe Whole
Regulation
PrintThe Whole
Part
PrintThe Whole
Title
PrintThe Whole
Chapter
PrintThe Whole
Section
PrintThis
Article
only
Changes over time for:
Article 274


Timeline of Changes
This timeline shows the different versions taken from EUR-Lex before exit day and during the implementation period as well as any subsequent versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation.
The dates for the EU versions are taken from the document dates on EUR-Lex and may not always coincide with when the changes came into force for the document.
For any versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation the date will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. For further information see our guide to revised legislation on Understanding Legislation.
Version Superseded: 01/01/2022
Status:
Point in time view as at 28/06/2013. This version of this provision has been superseded.

Status
You are viewing this legislation item as it stood at a particular point in time. A later version of this or provision, including subsequent changes and effects, supersedes this version.
Note the term provision is used to describe a definable element in a piece of legislation that has legislative effect – such as a Part, Chapter or section.
Changes to legislation:
There are currently no known outstanding effects by UK legislation for Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council,
Article 274
.

Changes to Legislation
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
[Article 274 U.K. Mark-to-Market Method
1. In order to determine the current replacement cost of all contracts with positive values, institutions shall attach the current market values to the contracts.
2. In order to determine the potential future credit exposure, institutions shall multiply the notional amounts or underlying values, as applicable, by the percentages in Table 1 and in accordance with the following principles:
(a)
contracts which do not fall within one of the five categories indicated in Table 1 shall be treated as contracts concerning commodities other than precious metals;
(b)
for contracts with multiple exchanges of principal, the percentages shall be multiplied by the number of remaining payments still to be made in accordance with the contract;
(c)
for contracts that are structured to settle outstanding exposure following specified payment dates and where the terms are reset so that the market value of the contract is zero on those specified dates, the residual maturity shall be equal to the time until the next reset date. In the case of interest-rate contracts that meet those criteria and have a remaining maturity of over one year, the percentage shall be no lower than 0,5 %.
Table 1
Residual maturity | Interest-rate contracts | Contracts concerning foreign-exchange rates and gold | Contracts concerning equities | Contracts concerning precious metals except gold | Contracts concerning commodities other than precious metals |
---|
One year or less | 0 % | 1 % | 6 % | 7 % | 10 % |
Over one year, not exceeding five years | 0,5 % | 5 % | 8 % | 7 % | 12 % |
Over five years | 1,5 % | 7,5 % | 10 % | 8 % | 15 % |
3. For contracts relating to commodities other than gold, which are referred to in point 3 of Annex II, an institution may, as an alternative to applying the percentages in Table 1, apply the percentages in Table 2 provided that that institution follows the extended maturity ladder approach set out in Article 361 for those contracts.
Table 2
Residual maturity | Precious metals (except gold) | Base metals | Agricultural products (softs) | Other, including energy products |
---|
One year or less | 2 % | 2,5 % | 3 % | 4 % |
Over one year, not exceeding five years | 5 % | 4 % | 5 % | 6 % |
Over five years | 7,5 % | 8 % | 9 % | 10 % |
4. The sum of current replacement cost and potential future credit exposure is the exposure value.]
Back to top