Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014of 17 July 2014laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the integrated administration and control system, rural development measures and cross compliance

Article 50U.K.Control rate and sampling of on-the-spot-checks

1.[F1The expenditure covered by on-the-spot checks shall represent at least 5 % of the expenditure referred to in Article 46 and co-financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) which is claimed to the paying agency each calendar year and which does not concern operations for which only advance payments have been claimed.]

[F2Where an operation subject to on-the-spot check has received advance or interim payments, those payments shall be counted towards the expenditure covered by on-the-spot checks as referred to in the first subparagraph.]

[F3As regards financial instruments, only the payments to the final recipients subject to on-the-spot checks shall be counted towards the expenditure covered by on-the-spot checks as referred to in the first subparagraph.]

2.[F1Only checks carried out until the date foreseen for submission of the control data and control statistics according to Article 9 shall be counted towards the achievement of the minimum level referred to in paragraph 1.]

Payment claims found not to be eligible after administrative checks shall not be counted towards the achievement of the minimum level referred to in paragraph 1.

3.Only checks meeting all the requirements of Articles 49 and 51 may be counted towards achievement of the minimum level referred to in paragraph 1.

4.The sample of approved operations to be checked in accordance with paragraph 1 shall take into account in particular:

(a)

the need to check an appropriate mix of types and sizes of operations;

(b)

any risk factors identified following national or Union checks;

(c)

the type of operation’s contribution to the risk of error in implementation of the rural development programme;

(d)

the need to maintain a balance between the measures and types of operations;

(e)

the need to select randomly between 30 % and 40 % of expenditure.

5.Where on-the-spot checks reveal any significant non-compliance in the context of a support measure or type of operation, the competent authority shall increase the control rate to an appropriate level in the following calendar year for the measure or type of operation concerned.

6.By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may decide to reduce the minimum level of on-the-spot checks carried out each calendar year as referred to in paragraph 1 to 3 % of the amount co-financed by EAFRD.

Member States may apply the first subparagraph only if the general conditions for reducing the minimum level of on-the-spot checks laid down by the Commission in accordance with Article 62(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 are fulfilled.

Where any of the conditions referred to in the second subparagraph are no longer met, Member States shall immediately revoke their decision to reduce the minimum level of on-the-spot checks. They shall apply the minimum level of on-the-spot checks referred to in paragraph 1 as of the following calendar year.

Textual Amendments