Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/105
Substituted by Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/105 of 19 October 2016 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1247/2012 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the format and frequency of trade reports to trade repositories according to Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (Official Journal of the European Union L 17 of 21 January 2017).
of 26 October 2016
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1247/2012 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the format and frequency of trade reports to trade repositories according to Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Regulation: power to modify conferred (11.7.2023) by Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (c. 29), ss. 3, 86(3), Sch. 1 Pts. 1, 3; S.I. 2023/779, reg. 2(d)
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories and in particular Article 9(6) thereof,
OJ L 201, 27.7.2012, p. 1.
Whereas:
(1) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1247/2012 provides for the use of interim entity identifiers where a legal entity identifier is not available. An infrastructure enabling the attribution of legal entity identifiers to entities has recently become available, and market participants have become familiar with the use of such legal entity identifiers. Therefore, legal entity identifiers should now be the only means allowed for the purpose of identification of legal entities.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1247/2012 of 19 December 2012 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the format and frequency of trade reports to trade repositories according to Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (OJ L 352, 21.12.2012, p. 20).
(2) Determining whether the reporting counterparty is a buyer or a seller in a contract is particularly complex in the case of swap derivative contracts as such contracts involve the exchange of financial instruments between the parties. Therefore, specific rules should be established in order to ensure the accurate and consistent determination of who are the buyers and who are the sellers in swap derivative contracts.
(3) In order to determine the real exposures of counterparties, competent authorities require complete and accurate information on the collateral exchanged between those counterparties. Accordingly, specific rules ensuring a consistent approach with regard to the reporting of collateralisation for a given derivative contract or portfolio should be determined.
(4) The accurate classification and precise identification of derivatives is essential for the efficient use of data and for the meaningful aggregation of data across trade repositories, and therefore contributes to the objectives of the Financial Stability Board set out in the Feasibility Study on Aggregation of OTC Derivatives Trade Repository Data published on 19 September 2014. Reporting requirements relating to the classification and identification of derivatives should therefore be amended so that this information is available in its entirety to competent authorities.
http://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/r_140919.pdf
(5) In order to accommodate for the reporting of new types of derivatives contracts which have become available and are traded on a frequent basis by virtue of financial innovation, swaptions and spreadbets should be added to the list of classes of derivative contracts. More broadly, in view of ongoing financial innovation giving rise to new types of derivative contracts, it is important to ensure that any new types of derivatives contracts that do not fall within an existing classification can nevertheless be reported. Therefore, it is appropriate to maintain the category ‘other’ in the classification of types of derivatives contracts.
(6) Where two counterparties cannot agree on which of them should generate a unique trade identifier within the reporting timeline provided, the correct identification and association of the two reports pertaining to the same transaction may not be possible. It is therefore necessary to establish criteria for the generation of unique trade identifiers so as to avoid counting the same transaction twice.
(7) Counterparties may face significant difficulty in obtaining all of the relevant information with regard to trades that were terminated before the commencement date for reporting. Given the resulting complexity of reporting terminated trades and the fact that such trades do not increase systemic risk, the period for reporting terminated trades should be extended from 3 years to 5 years from the commencement date for reporting.
(8) In order to ensure full harmonisation of the data reported to trade repositories and therefore enable its consistent interpretation and aggregation, the standards and formats to be used in trade reports should be clarified. It is also appropriate to amend the reporting requirements with respect to data formats. Counterparties and trade repositories should therefore be granted sufficient time to take all necessary action to comply with the amended requirements.
(9) Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1247/2012 should therefore be amended accordingly.
(10) This Regulation is based on draft implementing technical standards submitted by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to the Commission.
(11) In accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council, ESMA has conducted open public consultations on such draft implementing technical standards, analysed the potential related costs and benefits and requested the opinion of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group referred to in Article 37 of that Regulation,
Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 84).
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: