1.The smart readiness of a building or building unit reflects...2.The smart readiness of a building or building unit is...3.The smart readiness of a building or building unit is...4.The calculation of the smart readiness scores is based on...5.For expressing the smart readiness of a building or building...6.The calculation of the smart readiness scores of a building...7.The calculation of smart readiness scores is made in accordance...1.Each impact criterion set out in Annex II of this...2.For the ‘energy performance and operation’ key functionality, the relevant...3.For the ‘response to user needs’ key functionality, the relevant...4.For the ‘energy flexibility’ key functionality, the relevant impact criterion...1.Each technical domain is weighted for each of the impact...2.Technical domains’ weighting factors are expressed as a percentage, and...3.The standard approach to allocate weighting factors to the technical...4.Member States define the climatic zones that are used, where...5.The weighting factors of technical domains may differ between residential...6.Member States define the weighting factors and, for this purpose,...1.For the purpose of calculating smart readiness scores in accordance...2.A smart-ready service catalogue includes the list of smart-ready services...3.The definition and any subsequent update of smart-ready catalogues reflect...4.Member States are encouraged to provide guidelines to experts on...5.Member States may decide to make available several smart-ready catalogues,...1.To avoid unfairly penalising a building or building unit, some...2.Member States define the conditions under which such adaptations are...3.Weighting factors of those technical domains for which the (climatic)...1.The smart readiness rating is expressed on the basis of...2.Each smart readiness class corresponds to a range of total...

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/2155

of 14 October 2020

supplementing Directive (EU) 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing an optional common European Union scheme for rating the smart readiness of buildings

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings1, and in particular Article 8(10) thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

Directive 2010/31/EU is the main legislation, together with Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council2 and Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 of the European Parliament and of the Council3, addressing energy efficiency in buildings in the context of the 2030 energy efficiency targets. Directive 2010/31/EU has two complementary objectives, namely to accelerate the renovation of existing buildings by 2050 and to support the modernisation of all buildings by using smart technologies, such as those that make use of artificial intelligence and cloud-based services, and having a clearer link to clean mobility.

(2)

In order to support a consistent and transparent rating of the smart readiness of buildings in the Union, a common definition of the smart readiness indicator and a common methodology for calculating it should be established.

(3)

In order to ensure the acceptability, usability and consistency of the smart readiness indicator scheme, the Commission has developed, in collaboration with a wide range of stakeholders and in liaison with Member States, a methodology for rating smart readiness of buildings in accordance with Article 8(10) of Directive 2010/31/EU and its Annex IA.

(4)

That methodology for rating the smart readiness of buildings ensures a degree of consistency and comparability in rating of the smart readiness of buildings across the EU, while leaving enough flexibility to adapt the calculation to specific conditions.

(5)

Adequate control mechanisms on the implementation of the smart readiness indicator scheme should be established.

(6)

Where relevant, self-assessment of smart readiness by the owner, by the facility manager or any other stakeholder linked to the building, supported by open guidance and tools, should be possible.

(7)

In order to avoid the duplication of efforts and costs between the smart readiness indicator scheme and existing mandatory schemes, the methodology for rating the smart readiness of buildings should allow Member States, if they wish, to connect, or integrate, the smart readiness indicator scheme with national energy performance certification schemes and other schemes established under Directive 2010/31/EU.

(8)

The smart readiness indicator should be designed to reflect the smart readiness of buildings and their systems and should be used to complement – not to replace – tools that assess other aspects of buildings, for instance energy performance or sustainability.

(9)

The smart readiness indicator should not be an indicator for the energy performance of buildings. Building owners should be informed that the smart readiness as reflected in the smart readiness indicator and the energy performance of buildings as expressed by energy performance certificates are different issues, which therefore have to be addressed by different types of measures, though smart readiness should help enhance energy performance.

(10)

The benefits for consumers, building users and owners will be maximized when available instruments for rating buildings are used in combination, ensuring that the consumers, building users and owners can gain a comprehensive understanding of their buildings and of how they can improve overall performance.

(11)

The smart readiness indicator should be available for both existing buildings and new building projects. Digital models of buildings, including building information models or digital twins, should be allowed to be used to facilitate the calculation of smart readiness scores.

(12)

The smart readiness indicator calculation framework should be allowed to be used for all types of buildings and building units covered by Directive 2010/31/EU.

(13)

The smart readiness indicator should allow to highlight the additional benefits from advanced smart technologies for building owners and users, for instance in terms of energy savings and preparedness to climate change, or in terms of more inclusiveness and accessibility, comfort and well-being.

(14)

The assessment of the smart readiness of buildings and building units as part of the smart readiness indicator scheme for the purpose of issuing a smart readiness indicator certificate should be carried out by qualified or accredited experts.

(15)

Where Member States consider it appropriate, experts accredited for the energy performance certification of buildings, or for the inspection of heating, air-conditioning and combined heating or air-conditioning and ventilation systems under Directive 2010/31/EU, or for performing energy audits under Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council4, should be allowed to be considered competent also to assess the smart readiness of buildings or building units.

(16)

Increased digitisation and connectivity in buildings increases cybersecurity and data protection risks and makes buildings and their systems more vulnerable to cyber threats and misuse of personal data. The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted pursuant to Article 42(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725. The smart readiness indicator should help to inform building owners and users of those risks,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: