- Latest available (Revised)
- Original (As made)
This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format.
3.—(1) In regulation 91 (Relevant period in a dumping investigation)—
(a)in paragraph (1), for “paragraph 19(3)(a)(i)”, substitute “paragraph 19(3)(a)”;
(b)after paragraph (1), insert—
“(1A) The TRA may recommend that an anti-dumping amount should apply to goods from the relevant date specified in paragraph 19(3)(b) of Schedule 4 to the Act where in an anti-dumping investigation—
(a)a final determination of injury is made (but not a threat of injury or material retardation of the establishment of an industry), or
(b)a final determination of a threat of injury is made, and the TRA determines that injury would have occurred in the absence of provisional measures.”.
(c)after paragraph (3), insert—
“(4) The TRA may recommend that the anti-dumping amount to be applied during all or part of the relevant period is the same or less than the anti-dumping amount determined in the final affirmative determination, provided that the anti-dumping amount applied during the relevant period does not exceed the estimated anti-dumping amount as specified in paragraph 13(3)(a) of Schedule 4 to the Act.”.
(2) In regulation 92 (relevant period in a subsidisation investigation)—
(a)in paragraph (1), for “paragraph 19(3)(a)(i)”, substitute “paragraph 19(3)(a)”;
(b)after paragraph (1), insert—
“(1A) The TRA may recommend that a countervailing amount should apply to goods from the relevant date specified in paragraph 19(3)(b) of Schedule 4 to the Act where in a subsidisation investigation—
(a)a final determination of injury is made (but not a threat of injury or material retardation of the establishment of an injury), or
(b)a final determination of a threat of injury is made, and the TRA determines that injury would have occurred in the absence of provisional measures.”.
(c)after paragraph (2), insert—
“(3) The TRA may recommend that the countervailing amount to be applied during all or part of the relevant period is the same or less than the countervailing amount in the final affirmative determination, provided that the countervailing amount to be applied during the relevant period does not exceed the estimated countervailing amount as specified in paragraph 13(3)(b) of Schedule 4 to the Act.”.
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As Enacted or Made): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was enacted or made. No changes have been applied to the text.
Explanatory Memorandum sets out a brief statement of the purpose of a Statutory Instrument and provides information about its policy objective and policy implications. They aim to make the Statutory Instrument accessible to readers who are not legally qualified and accompany any Statutory Instrument or Draft Statutory Instrument laid before Parliament from June 2004 onwards.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: