
Print Options
PrintThe Whole
Instrument
PrintThe Whole
Part
PrintThis
Section
only
Status:
This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format.
Amendment to paragraph 24
This section has no associated Explanatory Memorandum
45. In paragraph 24(2) (refusal of a marketing authorisation)—
(a)in paragraph (b) for “risk-benefit balance” substitute “benefit-risk balance”;
(b)for paragraph (c) substitute—
“(c)the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence of the efficacy of the product in relation to the target species;”;
(c)after paragraph (f) insert—
“(g)the veterinary medicinal product is a veterinary medicinal product which contains an antimicrobial which is presented for use in order to promote the growth of treated animals or to increase yields from treated animals;
(h)the risk for public health in case of development of antimicrobial resistance or antiparasitic resistance outweighs the benefits of the veterinary medicinal product to animal health;
(i)the risks to public or animal health or to the environment are not sufficiently addressed;
(j)the qualitative or quantitative composition of the veterinary medicinal product is not as stated in the application;
(k)the active substance within the veterinary medicinal product meets the criteria for being considered persistent, bio-accumulative and toxic and the veterinary medicinal product is intended to be used in food-producing animals (except where it is demonstrated that the active substance is essential to prevent or control a serious risk to animal health).”.
Back to top