xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

PART III SOPHTHALMIC LIST

Deferment of decision on applicationS

9.—(1) Without prejudice to the Board's power under section 29 of the Act (the NHS Tribunal) to make representations to the Tribunal that an applicant meets a condition for disqualification, a Board may defer a decision on any application to be included in its Ophthalmic List, where–

(a)there are, in respect of the applicant–

(i)criminal proceedings in the British Islands conviction in respect of which would be likely to lead to refusal to include the applicant in, or the removal of the applicant from, an Ophthalmic List, or would be likely to lead the Tribunal (if representations were made to it) to be of the opinion that the applicant meets a condition for disqualification, or

(ii)proceedings elsewhere in the world relating to conduct, which, if it had occurred in the British Islands, would constitute a criminal offence,

the outcome of which would be likely to lead to refusal to include the applicant in, or the removal of the applicant from, an Ophthalmic List, or would be likely to lead the Tribunal (if representations were made to it) to be of the opinion that the applicant meets a condition for disqualification;

(b)in respect of a body corporate of which the applicant is, has in the preceding 6 months been, or was at the time of the originating events, a director or one of the body of persons with control of that body corporate, there are–

(i)criminal proceedings in the British Islands conviction in respect of which would be likely to lead to refusal to include the applicant in, or the removal of the applicant from, an Ophthalmic List, or would be likely to lead the Tribunal (if representations were made to it) to be of the opinion that the applicant meets a condition for disqualification, or

(ii)proceedings elsewhere in the world relating to conduct which, if it had occurred in the British Islands, would constitute a criminal offence,

the outcome of which would be likely to lead to refusal to include the applicant in, or the removal of the applicant from, an Ophthalmic List, or would be likely to lead the Tribunal (if representations were made to it) to be of the opinion that the applicant meets a condition for disqualification;

(c)the applicant or a body corporate of which the applicant is, or has in the preceding 6 months been, or was at the time of the originating events, a director or one of the body of persons with control of that body corporate, is the subject of an investigation or proceedings relating to the professional conduct of the applicant or the body corporate by any licensing or regulatory body (including one by the Agency or another Health Board or equivalent body) in the United Kingdom or elsewhere in the world, the outcome of which would be likely to lead to refusal to include in, or removal from, an Ophthalmic List or would be likely to lead the Tribunal (if representations were made to it) to be of the opinion that the applicant meets a condition for disqualification;

(d)where the applicant is a body corporate, the applicant is the subject of an investigation or proceedings relating to the professional conduct of the applicant by any licensing or regulatory body (including one by the Agency or another Health Board or equivalent body) in the United Kingdom or elsewhere in the world, the outcome of which would be likely to lead to refusal to include in, or removal from, an Ophthalmic List or would be likely to lead the Tribunal (if representations were made to it) to be of the opinion that the applicant meets a condition for disqualification;

(e)a body corporate of which the applicant is, has in the preceding 6 months been, or was at the time of the originating events, a director, or one of the body of persons with control of that body corporate, is suspended from any list or equivalent list;

(f)the applicant is being investigated by the Agency in relation to any fraud, where the result, if adverse, would be likely to lead to the applicant's removal from the Board's Ophthalmic List if the applicant were to be included in it;

(g)a body corporate, of which the applicant is, has in the preceding 6 months been, or was at the time of the originating events a director, or one of the body of persons with control of that body corporate, is being investigated by the Agency in relation to any fraud, where the result, if adverse, would be likely to lead to the applicant's removal from the Board's Ophthalmic List if the applicant were to be included in it;

(h)the Tribunal is considering an application from a Board for disqualification of the applicant or of a body corporate of which the applicant is, has in the preceding 6 months been, or was at the time of the originating events, a director or one of the body of persons with control of that body corporate; F1...

(i)the applicant has been suspended from a list by a Health Board, or from an equivalent list by an equivalent body [F2; F3...

(j)after an inspection of the premises for the purposes of regulation 7(4B)-(4E), the Board provided the applicant with a reasonable period of time to carry out such work as the Board has specified in order to ensure that the premises meet the required standard to comply with the provisions of paragraph 6 of Schedule 1][F4; or

(k)the applicant is being considered for listing and the Board is satisfied that it is necessary for the protection of members of the public for the application to be deferred.]

(2) A Board may only defer a decision under paragraph (1) until the outcome of the relevant event mentioned in any of sub paragraphs (a) to [F5(k)] of that paragraph is known.

(3) The Board must notify the applicant that it has deferred a decision on the application and the grounds for the deferral.

(4) Once the outcome of the relevant event mentioned in paragraph (1) is known, the Board shall notify the applicant in writing that the applicant must within 28 days of the date of the notification (or such longer period as the Board may agree)–

(a)update the applicant's application; and

(b)confirm in writing that the applicant wishes to proceed with the application,

and the provisions of regulations 7, 8 and 9 shall apply to the application.

(5) Provided any additional information required by paragraph (4) has been received by it within the period of 28 days specified in paragraph (4) or any longer period agreed, the Board shall notify the applicant as soon as possible–

(a)that the application has been successful; or

(b)that the Board has decided to refuse the application and the grounds for that decision.

(6) In this regulation, “the outcome of the relevant event” means the final determination of any proceedings (including proceedings pending the determination of which the applicant is suspended) or investigation referred to in [F6regulation] 9(1)(a) to (i).

Textual Amendments