PART 9Provision of information, functions of the Authority and modification of this Order in relation to microgenerators in certain circumstances

F1Bioliquid sustainability audit report54A

1

This article applies to a generating station which generates electricity (wholly or partly) from bioliquid in respect of which the operator of the generating station has submitted sustainability information.

2

In relation to each consignment of bioliquid used in a generating station to which this article applies, the operator of the station must, by the 31st May immediately following the obligation period during which the bioliquid referred to in paragraph (1) is used (“the relevant date”), provide the Authority with a sustainability audit report meeting the requirements specified in paragraph (3).

3

The requirements specified in this paragraph are that the sustainability audit report must—

a

be prepared by a person who is not—

i

the owner or operator of the generating station; or

ii

a connected person, in relation to the owner or operator of the generating station;

F4b

consider whether the systems used to produce the relevant sustainability information are likely to produce information which is reasonably accurate and reliable;

ba

consider whether there are controls in place to help protect the relevant sustainability information against material misstatements due to fraud or error;

c

consider the frequency and methodology of any sampling carried out for the purpose of obtaining or checking the data on which the operator relied in preparing the relevant sustainability information;

d

consider the robustness of the data on which the operator relied in preparing the relevant sustainability information;

da

state whether anything has come to the attention of the person preparing the report to indicate that the relevant sustainability information is not accurate;

e

be prepared to an adequate standard;

F2f

identify whether the bioliquid was certified under an environmental quality assurance scheme, and if so—

i

state the name of the scheme; and

ii

identify whether the European Commission has adopted a decision under article 18(4) of the Renewables Directive in respect of the scheme; and

g

where the bioliquid was not derived from waste or residue and the actual value method or the mixed value method was used for the purpose of calculating the greenhouse gas emissions from the use of the bioliquid, identify—

i

whether a restored degraded land bonus was included in the calculation of the greenhouse gas emissions from the use of the bioliquid; and

ii

whether an emission saving from soil carbon accumulation via improved agricultural management was included in the calculation of the greenhouse gas emissions from the use of the bioliquid.

4

Subject to paragraph (5), it is for the operator of the generating station to demonstrate to the Authority’s satisfaction that the sustainability audit report was prepared to an adequate standard.

F65

A sustainability audit report shall be deemed to have been prepared to an adequate standard if it has been prepared in accordance with the requirements in respect of limited assurance engagements prescribed in ISAE 3000, or an equivalent standard.

6

Where, in relation to bioliquid used in a generating station to which this article applies, the operator of the station fails to provide the Authority with a sustainability audit report meeting the requirements specified in paragraph (3) by the relevant date, the Authority must, in relation to any SROCs to which the operator would otherwise be entitled, postpone the issue of those SROCs (up to the specified number) until such time as the sustainability audit report is provided.

7

For the purposes of paragraph (6), the specified number is the number of SROCs which the Authority has or estimates that it has or, but for this article, it would have issued in respect of the electricity generated by the bioliquid in relation to which a sustainability audit report meeting the requirements specified in paragraph (3) should have been provided.

F38

In this article—

  • “actual value method” has the same meaning as in Schedule A1;

  • “emission saving from soil carbon accumulation via improved agricultural management” has the same meaning as in Part C of Annex 5 to the Renewables Directive;

  • F5“environmental quality assurance scheme” means a voluntary scheme which establishes environmental or social standards in relation to the production of bioliquid or matter from which a bioliquid is derived;

  • “mixed value method” has the same meaning as in Schedule A1;

  • “relevant sustainability information”, in relation to a consignment of bioliquid, means the sustainability information submitted by the operator of the generating station in respect of the consignment;

  • “restored degraded land bonus” means the bonus referred to in paragraphs 7 and 8 of Part C of Annex 5 to the Renewables Directive.