PART 4SPECIFIC DUTIES
Selection of tenderers: exclusion of economic operators on grounds of criminal activity8.
(1)
A contracting authority must exclude an economic operator from participation in a procurement procedure where the contracting authority has established or is otherwise aware that that economic operator or a person to whom paragraph (2) applies has been convicted of any of the following offences—
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(i)
the offence of cheating the Revenue;
(ii)
the common law offence of fraud;
(iii)
the common law offence of theft or fraud;
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
the common law offence of uttering; or
(viii)
the common law offence of attempting to pervert the course of justice;
(f)
any offence listed in—
(i)
(ii)
Schedule 2 to that Act where the court has determined that there is a terrorist connection.
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
any other offence within the meaning of Article 57(1) of the Directive as defined by the law of any EEA state or any part thereof.
(2)
This paragraph applies to a person who is a member of the administrative, management or supervisory body of the economic operator referred to in paragraph (1) or has powers of representation, decision or control in relation to such economic operator.
(3)
A contracting authority may disregard any of the prohibitions imposed by this regulation, on an exceptional basis, for overriding reasons relating to the public interest such as public health or protection of the environment.
(4)
A contracting authority must exclude an economic operator where the authority becomes aware, at any time during the procedure, that the economic operator is, in view of acts committed or omitted either before or during the procedure, in one of the situations referred to in this regulation.
(5)
Subject to paragraphs (3) and (7), the period during which the economic operator must be excluded under this regulation is five years from the date of the conviction by final judgment.
(6)
Any economic operator that is in one of the situations referred to in this regulation may provide evidence to the effect that measures taken by the economic operator are sufficient to demonstrate its reliability despite the existence of a relevant ground for exclusion.
(7)
If the contracting authority is satisfied that the evidence proves that the measures are sufficient for the purpose referred to in paragraph (6), the authority must not exclude the economic operator from the procurement procedure.
(8)
For the purposes mentioned in paragraph (7), the economic operator must prove that it has—
(a)
paid or undertaken to pay compensation in respect of any damage caused by the criminal offence;
(b)
clarified the facts and circumstances in a comprehensive manner by actively collaborating with the investigating authorities; and
(c)
taken concrete technical, organisational and personnel measures that are appropriate to prevent further criminal offences.
(9)
The measures taken by the economic operator must be evaluated by the contracting authority taking into account the gravity and particular circumstances of the criminal offence.
(10)
Where the contracting authority considers that the measures are insufficient, the authority must give to the economic operator a statement of the reasons for that decision.