SCHEDULE 4METHODS OF ANALYSIS

Regulation 20(1) and (2)

1.

(1)

The enforcing authority must ensure that the methods of analysis used for the purposes of monitoring and demonstrating compliance with these Regulations are validated and documented in accordance with European standard EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005 entitled “General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories (ISO/IEC 17025:2005)28, or other equivalent standards accepted at international level.

(2)

The enforcing authority must ensure that laboratories or parties contracted by laboratories apply quality management system practices in accordance with European standard EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005 entitled “General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories (ISO/IEC 17025:2005)”, or other equivalent standards accepted at international level.

2.

In the absence of an analytical method meeting the minimum performance criteria set out in Part B of this schedule, the enforcing authority must ensure that monitoring is carried out using best available techniques not entailing excessive costs.

PART AMicrobiological parameters

1.

(1)

Subject to sub-paragraph (2), the methods in paragraph 2 are given for reference.

(2)

The enforcing authority may use other methods, providing the provisions of regulation 20 are met.

2.

The methods for microbiological parameters are—

(a)

for Escherichia coli and coliform bacteria—

(i)

European standard EN ISO 9308-1:2014 entitled “Water quality - Enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliform bacteria - Part 1: Membrane filtration method for waters with low bacterial background flora (ISO 9308-1:2014)29; or

(ii)

European standard EN ISO 9308-2:2014 entitled “Water quality - Enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliform bacteria - Part 2: Most probable number method (ISO 9308-2:2012)30;

(b)

for enterococci, European standard EN ISO 7899-2:2000 entitled “Water quality - Detection and enumeration of intestinal enterococci - Part 2: Membrane filtration method (ISO 7899-2:2000)31;

(c)

for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, European standard EN ISO 16266:2008 entitled “Water quality - Detection and enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Method by membrane filtration (ISO 16266:2006)32;

(d)

for colony count 22 °C (the enumeration of culturable microorganisms — colony count after aerobic incubation at 22 °C), European standard EN ISO 6222:1999 entitled “Water quality - Enumeration of culturable micro-organisms - Colony count by inoculation in a nutrient agar culture medium (ISO 6222:1999)33; and

(e)

for Clostridium perfringens including spores, European standard EN ISO 14189:2016 entitled “Water quality - Enumeration of Clostridium perfringens - Method using membrane filtration (ISO 14189:2013)34.

PART BChemical and indicator parameters

1.

(1)

Subject to paragraph 3, for a parameter in Table 1, the method of analysis used must, as a minimum, be capable of measuring concentrations equal to the parametric value for the parameter with—

(a)

a limit of quantification of 30 % or less of the parametric value; and

(b)

an uncertainty of measurement as specified in Table 1.

(2)

The result of the analysis for a parameter in Table B or Table C must be expressed using at least the same number of significant figures as the parametric value for the parameter in the table.

Annotations:
Commencement Information

I5Sch. 4 Pt. B para. 1 in force at 27.10.2017, see reg. 1(1)

2.

The uncertainty of measurement specified in Table 1 must not be used as an additional tolerance to the parametric values.

3.

Until 31st December 2019, the enforcing authority may, for a parameter in Table 2, use the F1corresponding ‘trueness’, ‘precision’ and ‘limit of detection’ in that table as an alternative set of performance characteristics (instead of using the limit of quantification and the uncertainty of measurement referred to in paragraph 1(1)).

TABLE 1Minimum performance characteristic: uncertainty of measurement

Parameter

Uncertainty of measurement

(% of parametric value, except pH) (Note 1)

Notes35

Aluminium

25

Ammonium

40

Antimony

40

Arsenic

30

Benzo(a)pyrene

50

Note 5

Benzene

40

Boron

25

Bromate

40

Cadmium

25

Chloride

15

Chromium

30

Conductivity

20

Copper

25

Cyanide

30

Note 6

1,2-dichloroethane

40

Fluoride

20

Hydrogen ion concentration (in pH)

0.2

Note 7

Iron

30

Lead

25

Manganese

30

Mercury

30

Nickel

25

Nitrate

15

Nitrite

20

Oxidisability

50

Note 8

Pesticides

30

Note 9

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

F250

Note 10

Selenium

40

Sodium

15

Sulphate

15

Tetrachloroethene

30

Note 11

Trichloroethene

40

Note 11

Trihalomethanes: total

40

Note 10

Total organic carbon

30

Note 12

Turbidity

30

Note 13

TABLE 2Minimum performance characteristics: trueness, precision and limit of detection

Parameter

Trueness

(% of parametric value, except for pH) (Note 2)

Precision

(% of parametric value, except for pH) (Note 3)

Limit of detection

(% of parametric value, except for pH) (Note 4)

Notes36

Aluminium

10

10

10

Ammonium

10

10

10

Antimony

25

25

25

Arsenic

10

10

10

Benzo(a)pyrene

25

25

25

Benzene

25

25

25

Boron

10

10

10

Bromate

25

25

25

Cadmium

10

10

10

Chloride

10

10

10

Chromium

10

10

10

Conductivity

10

10

10

Copper

10

10

10

Cyanide

10

10

10

Note 6

1,2-dichloroethane

25

25

10

Fluoride

10

10

10

Hydrogen ion concentration (in pH)

0.2

0.2

Note 7

Iron

10

10

10

Lead

10

10

10

Manganese

10

10

10

Mercury

20

10

20

Nickel

10

10

10

Nitrate

10

10

10

Nitrite

10

10

10

Oxidisability

25

25

F310

Note 8

Pesticides

25

25

25

Note 9

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

25

25

25

Note 10

Selenium

10

10

10

Sodium

10

10

10

Sulphate

10

10

10

Tetrachloroethene

25

25

10

Note 11

Trichloroethene

25

25

10

Note 11

Trihalomethanes: total

25

25

10

Note 10

Turbidity

25

25

25

Notes to Table 1 and Table 2

Note 1: Uncertainty of measurement is a non-negative parameter characterising the dispersion of the quantity values being attributed to a measurand, based on the information used. The performance criterion for measurement uncertainty (k = 2) is the percentage of the parametric value stated in the table or better. Measurement uncertainty must be estimated at the level of the parametric value, unless otherwise specified.

Note 2: Trueness is a measure of systematic error, i.e. the difference between the mean value of the large number of repeated measurements and the true value. Further specifications are those set out in international standard ISO 5725 entitled “Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results37.

Note 3: Precision is a measure of random error and is usually expressed as the standard deviation (within and between batches) of the spread of results from the mean. Acceptable precision is twice the relative standard deviation. This term is further specified in international standard ISO 5725 entitled partly “Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results”.

Note 4: Limit of detection is either three times the standard deviation within a batch of a natural sample containing a low concentration of the parameter, or five times the standard deviation of a blank sample (within a batch).

Note 5: If the value of uncertainty of measurement cannot be met, the best available technique should be selected (up to 60 %).

Note 6: The method determines total cyanide in all forms.

Note 7: Values for trueness, precision and uncertainty of measurement are expressed in pH units.

Note 8: Reference method European standard EN ISO 8467:1995 entitled “Water quality - Determination of permanganate index (ISO 8467:1993)38.

Note 9: The performance characteristics for individual pesticides are given as an indication. Values for the uncertainty of measurement as low as 30 % can be achieved for several pesticides, higher values up to 80 % may be allowed for a number of pesticides.

Note 10: The performance characteristics apply to individual substances, specified at 25 % of the parametric value in Table B.

Note 11: The performance characteristics apply to individual substances, specified at 50 % of the parametric value in Table B.

Note 12: The uncertainty of measurement should be estimated at the level of 3 mg/l of the total organic carbon in accordance with European standard EN 1484:1997 entitled “Water analysis - Guidelines for the determination of total organic carbon and dissolved organic carbon39.

PART CIndicative dose

For each parameter in Table 3, the method of analysis used must be capable of measuring activity concentrations with at least the limit of detection specified for that parameter in the second column of that table.

TABLE 3Minimum performance characteristics: limit of detection

Parameter

Limit of detection (in Bq/l) (Notes 1 and 2)

Notes

Tritium

10

Note 3

Radon

10

Note 3

gross alpha activity

0.04

Note 4

gross beta activity

0.4

Note 4

U-238

0.02

U-234

0.02

Ra-226

0.04

Ra-228

0.02

Note 5

Pb-210

0.02

Po-210

0.01

C-14

20

Sr-90

0.4

Pu-239 / Pu-240

0.04

Am-241

0.06

Co-60

0.5

Cs-134

0.5

Cs-137

0.5

I-131

0.5

Notes to Table 3

Note 1: The limit of detection must be calculated in accordance with the international standard ISO 11929:2010 entitled “Determination of the characteristic limits (decision threshold, detection limit and limits of the confidence interval) for measurements of ionising radiation - Fundamentals and application41, with probabilities of errors of 1st and 2nd kind of 0.05 each.
Note 2: Measurement uncertainties must be calculated and reported as complete standard uncertainties, or as expanded standard uncertainties with an expansion factor of 1.96, in accordance with international standard ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008 entitled “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement42.

Note 3: The limit of detection for tritium and for radon is 10% of the corresponding parametric value for the parameter.

Note 4: The limit of detection for gross alpha activity and gross beta activities is 40% of the screening values of 0.1 Bq/l and 1.0 Bq/l respectively.

Note 5: This limit of detection applies only to initial screening for indicative dose for a new water source. If initial checking indicates that it is unlikely that Ra-228 exceeds 20% of the derived concentration, the limit of detection may be increased to 0.08 Bq/l for routine Ra-228 nuclide specific measurements, until a subsequent re-check is required.