SCHEDULE 4METHODS OF ANALYSIS
1.
(1)
(2)
The enforcing authority must ensure that laboratories or parties contracted by laboratories apply quality management system practices in accordance with European standard EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005 entitled “General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories (ISO/IEC 17025:2005)”, or other equivalent standards accepted at international level.
2.
In the absence of an analytical method meeting the minimum performance criteria set out in Part B of this schedule, the enforcing authority must ensure that monitoring is carried out using best available techniques not entailing excessive costs.
PART AMicrobiological parameters
1.
(1)
Subject to sub-paragraph (2), the methods in paragraph 2 are given for reference.
(2)
The enforcing authority may use other methods, providing the provisions of regulation 20 are met.
2.
The methods for microbiological parameters are—
(a)
for Escherichia coli and coliform bacteria—
(i)
(ii)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
PART BChemical and indicator parameters
1.
(1)
Subject to paragraph 3, for a parameter in Table 1, the method of analysis used must, as a minimum, be capable of measuring concentrations equal to the parametric value for the parameter with—
(a)
a limit of quantification of 30 % or less of the parametric value; and
(b)
an uncertainty of measurement as specified in Table 1.
(2)
The result of the analysis for a parameter in Table B or Table C must be expressed using at least the same number of significant figures as the parametric value for the parameter in the table.
2.
The uncertainty of measurement specified in Table 1 must not be used as an additional tolerance to the parametric values.
3.
Until 31st December 2019, the enforcing authority may, for a parameter in Table 2, use the F1corresponding ‘trueness’, ‘precision’ and ‘limit of detection’ in that table as an alternative set of performance characteristics (instead of using the limit of quantification and the uncertainty of measurement referred to in paragraph 1(1)).
Parameter | Uncertainty of measurement (% of parametric value, except pH) (Note 1) | Notes35 |
---|---|---|
Aluminium | 25 | |
Ammonium | 40 | |
Antimony | 40 | |
Arsenic | 30 | |
Benzo(a)pyrene | 50 | Note 5 |
Benzene | 40 | |
Boron | 25 | |
Bromate | 40 | |
Cadmium | 25 | |
Chloride | 15 | |
Chromium | 30 | |
Conductivity | 20 | |
Copper | 25 | |
Cyanide | 30 | Note 6 |
1,2-dichloroethane | 40 | |
Fluoride | 20 | |
Hydrogen ion concentration (in pH) | 0.2 | Note 7 |
Iron | 30 | |
Lead | 25 | |
Manganese | 30 | |
Mercury | 30 | |
Nickel | 25 | |
Nitrate | 15 | |
Nitrite | 20 | |
Oxidisability | 50 | Note 8 |
Pesticides | 30 | Note 9 |
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons | F250 | Note 10 |
Selenium | 40 | |
Sodium | 15 | |
Sulphate | 15 | |
Tetrachloroethene | 30 | Note 11 |
Trichloroethene | 40 | Note 11 |
Trihalomethanes: total | 40 | Note 10 |
Total organic carbon | 30 | Note 12 |
Turbidity | 30 | Note 13 |
Parameter | Trueness (% of parametric value, except for pH) (Note 2) | Precision (% of parametric value, except for pH) (Note 3) | Limit of detection (% of parametric value, except for pH) (Note 4) | Notes36 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aluminium | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Ammonium | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Antimony | 25 | 25 | 25 | |
Arsenic | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Benzo(a)pyrene | 25 | 25 | 25 | |
Benzene | 25 | 25 | 25 | |
Boron | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Bromate | 25 | 25 | 25 | |
Cadmium | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Chloride | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Chromium | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Conductivity | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Copper | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Cyanide | 10 | 10 | 10 | Note 6 |
1,2-dichloroethane | 25 | 25 | 10 | |
Fluoride | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Hydrogen ion concentration (in pH) | 0.2 | 0.2 | Note 7 | |
Iron | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Lead | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Manganese | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Mercury | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Nickel | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Nitrate | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Nitrite | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Oxidisability | 25 | 25 | F310 | Note 8 |
Pesticides | 25 | 25 | 25 | Note 9 |
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons | 25 | 25 | 25 | Note 10 |
Selenium | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Sodium | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Sulphate | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Tetrachloroethene | 25 | 25 | 10 | Note 11 |
Trichloroethene | 25 | 25 | 10 | Note 11 |
Trihalomethanes: total | 25 | 25 | 10 | Note 10 |
Turbidity | 25 | 25 | 25 |
Notes to Table 1 and Table 2
Note 1: Uncertainty of measurement is a non-negative parameter characterising the dispersion of the quantity values being attributed to a measurand, based on the information used. The performance criterion for measurement uncertainty (k = 2) is the percentage of the parametric value stated in the table or better. Measurement uncertainty must be estimated at the level of the parametric value, unless otherwise specified.
Note 3: Precision is a measure of random error and is usually expressed as the standard deviation (within and between batches) of the spread of results from the mean. Acceptable precision is twice the relative standard deviation. This term is further specified in international standard ISO 5725 entitled partly “Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results”.
Note 4: Limit of detection is either three times the standard deviation within a batch of a natural sample containing a low concentration of the parameter, or five times the standard deviation of a blank sample (within a batch).
Note 5: If the value of uncertainty of measurement cannot be met, the best available technique should be selected (up to 60 %).
Note 6: The method determines total cyanide in all forms.
Note 7: Values for trueness, precision and uncertainty of measurement are expressed in pH units.
Note 9: The performance characteristics for individual pesticides are given as an indication. Values for the uncertainty of measurement as low as 30 % can be achieved for several pesticides, higher values up to 80 % may be allowed for a number of pesticides.
Note 10: The performance characteristics apply to individual substances, specified at 25 % of the parametric value in Table B.
Note 11: The performance characteristics apply to individual substances, specified at 50 % of the parametric value in Table B.
PART CIndicative dose
For each parameter in Table 3, the method of analysis used must be capable of measuring activity concentrations with at least the limit of detection specified for that parameter in the second column of that table.
Parameter | Limit of detection (in Bq/l) (Notes 1 and 2) | Notes |
---|---|---|
Tritium | 10 | Note 3 |
Radon | 10 | Note 3 |
gross alpha activity | 0.04 | Note 4 |
gross beta activity | 0.4 | Note 4 |
U-238 | 0.02 | |
U-234 | 0.02 | |
Ra-226 | 0.04 | |
Ra-228 | 0.02 | Note 5 |
Pb-210 | 0.02 | |
Po-210 | 0.01 | |
C-14 | 20 | |
Sr-90 | 0.4 | |
Pu-239 / Pu-240 | 0.04 | |
Am-241 | 0.06 | |
Co-60 | 0.5 | |
Cs-134 | 0.5 | |
Cs-137 | 0.5 | |
I-131 | 0.5 |
Notes to Table 3
Note 3: The limit of detection for tritium and for radon is 10% of the corresponding parametric value for the parameter.
Note 4: The limit of detection for gross alpha activity and gross beta activities is 40% of the screening values of 0.1 Bq/l and 1.0 Bq/l respectively.
Note 5: This limit of detection applies only to initial screening for indicative dose for a new water source. If initial checking indicates that it is unlikely that Ra-228 exceeds 20% of the derived concentration, the limit of detection may be increased to 0.08 Bq/l for routine Ra-228 nuclide specific measurements, until a subsequent re-check is required.