The Police Pensions (Remediable Service) (Scotland) Regulations 2023

CHAPTER 1 Opted-out service elections

Application and interpretation of Chapter 1

5.—(1) This Chapter applies to and in respect of a member (“ M”) with relevant opted-out service in an employment or office in relation to M’s legacy scheme(1).

(2) In this Chapter—

“opted-out service decision-maker” means the person who may make an opted-out service election in accordance with regulation 6(2);

“relevant opted-out service” means the service referred to in paragraph (1).

Election in relation to opted-out service

6.—(1) An election (an “opted-out service election”) may be made in relation to M’s relevant opted-out service in accordance with this Chapter and section 5 of PSPJOA 2022.

(2) An opted-out service election may be made—

(a) by M, or

(b) where M is deceased, by the eligible decision-maker specified in the schedule.

(3) Where a person (“P”) other than M is the opted-out service decision-maker, an opted-out service election may only be made after the scheme manager determines an application which is—

(a) made by or behalf of M,

(b) in a form and manner determined by the scheme manager,

(c) received by the scheme manager during the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which a remediable service statement is provided in relation to M under regulation 4(2)(a), and

(d) accompanied by such information—

(i) which is information within P’s possession, or

(ii) which P may reasonably be expected to obtain,

that the scheme manager may by written notice require the person to provide in relation to the decision which caused the service in question to become opted-out service.

(4) As soon as is reasonably practicable after receipt of an application, the scheme manager must—

(a) determine whether an opted-out service election may be made in relation to M, and

(b) notify the person who made the application whether such an opted-out service election may be made.

(5) The scheme manager must refuse an application where either of the following conditions are not met—

(a) the decision by virtue of which M’s service became opted-out service was communicated to the scheme manager on or after 12 March 2012; or

(b) the decision by virtue of which M’s service became opted-out service was made pursuant to a relevant breach of a non-discrimination rule(2).

(6) Where the scheme manager is the opted-out service decision-maker, the scheme manager must, as soon as is reasonably practicable after determining that they are the opted-out service decision-maker, determine whether to make an opted-out service election in relation to M.

(7) But the scheme manager must not refuse an application where the decision by virtue of which M’s service became opted-out service was communicated to the scheme manager during the period—

(a) beginning on the day six months before M would have (but for the opt-out decision) become a member of the reformed scheme, and

(b) ending at the end of 28th February 2022.

(8) An opted-out service election to be made by—

(a) a person other than the scheme manager is made when the person confirms that an opted-out service election is to be made following receipt of the notification mentioned in paragraph (4)(b);

(b) the scheme manager is made at the time determined by the scheme manager.

(9) See section 5(2) to (4) of PSPJOA 2022 about the effect, timing and irrevocability of an opted-out service election.

(1)

See sections 5(7) (read with section 4) and 36 of PSPJOA 2022 for the meaning of relevant opted-out service in relation to a Chapter 1 legacy scheme (such as the 1987 and 2006 schemes).

(2)

See section 25(8) of PSPJOA 2022 for the meaning of “non-discrimination rule” and section 25(9) for circumstances in which breach of such a rule is “relevant”.