Search Legislation

Medicines Act 1968

 Help about what version

What Version

 Help about advanced features

Advanced Features

 Help about opening options

Opening OptionsExpand opening options

Changes over time for: Section 67A

 Help about opening options

Version Superseded: 01/12/2022

Alternative versions:

Status:

Point in time view as at 16/04/2018. This version of this provision has been superseded. Help about Status

Changes to legislation:

Medicines Act 1968, Section 67A is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 27 February 2025. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. Help about Changes to Legislation

[F167A.Defence to offence of contravening section 63(a) or (b): product not sold or suppliedU.K.

(1)This section applies in a case where—

(a)a person (“the defendant”) is charged with an offence under section 67(2) of contravening section 63(a) or (b) in respect of a medicinal product; and

(b)the product is not sold or supplied in its adulterated state.

(2)Where the defendant is charged with contravening section 63(a), it is a defence for the defendant to prove that—

(a)the adulteration took place at a registered pharmacy;

(b)the defendant—

(i)was a registrant acting in the course of his or her profession, or

(ii)was acting under the supervision of a person who was a registrant acting in the course of his or her profession; and

(c)at the time of the alleged contravention, the defendant did not know that the product was being adulterated.

(3)Where the defendant is charged with contravening section 63(b), it is a defence for the defendant to prove that—

(a)the adulteration took place at a registered pharmacy;

(b)the person who adulterated the product—

(i)was a registrant acting in the course of his or her profession, or

(ii)was acting under the supervision of a person who was a registrant acting in the course of his or her profession; and

(c)at the time of the alleged contravention, the defendant did not know that the product had been adulterated.]

Back to top

Options/Help