Part III E+W+S Discrimination in Other Fields

Modifications etc. (not altering text)

C1 Pt. III (ss. 22–36) excluded by Employment Act 1989 (c. 38, SIF 43:1, 106:1), ss. 4(1)(b), 5(1)(7)

C2 Pt. III (ss. 22–36) excluded by S.I. 1989/2420, art. 3

C3 Pt. III (ss. 22-36) applied (1.10.1998) by 1998 c. 31, s. 25, Sch. 5 para. 6(a) (with ss. 138(9), 144(6)); S.I. 1998/2212, art. 2(1), Sch. 1 Pt. I

Pt. III (ss. 22-36) applied (1.9.1999) by 1998 c. 31, s. 24, Sch. 4 para. 8(a) (with ss. 138(9), 144(6)); S.I. 1999/2323, art. 2(1), Sch. 1

Goods, facilities, services and premisesF1 E+W+S

Textual Amendments

F1 Ss. 35A, 35B inserted by virtue of Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 (c. 41, SIF 37), ss. 64(1), 65(1), Sch. 19 para. 1

29 Discrimination in provision of goods, facilities or services. E+W+S

(1) It is unlawful for any person concerned with the provision (for payment or not) of goods, facilities or services to the public or a section of the public to discriminate against a woman who seeks to obtain or use those goods, facilities or services—

(a) by refusing or deliberately omitting to provide her with any of them, or

(b) by refusing or deliberately omitting to provide her with goods, facilities or services of the like quality, in the like manner and on the like terms as are normal in his case in relation to male members of the public or (where she belongs to a section of the public) to male members of that section.

(2) The following are examples of the facilities and services mentioned in subsection (1)—

(a) access to and use of any place which members of the public or a section of the public are permitted to enter;

(b) accommodation in a hotel, boarding house or other similar establishment;

(c) facilities by way of banking or insurance or for grants, loans, credit or finance;

(d) facilities for education;

(e) facilities for entertainment, recreation or refreshment;

(f) facilities for transport or travel;

(g) the services of any profession or trade, or any local or other public authority.

(3) For the avoidance of doubt it is hereby declared that where a particular skill is commonly exercised in a different way for men and for women it does not contravene subsection (1) for a person who does not normally exercise it for women to insist on exercising it for a woman only in accordance with his normal practice or, if he reasonably considers it impracticable to do that in her case, to refuse or deliberately omit to exercise it.