xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

Part VIIU.K. Miscellaneous and Supplementary

RemandE+W

128 Remand in custody or on bail. E+W

(1)Where a magistrates’ court has power to remand any person, then, subject to section 4 of the M1Bail Act 1976 and to any other enactment modifying that power, the court may—

(a)remand him in custody, that is to say, commit him to custody to be brought before the court [F1, subject to subsection (3A) below,] at the end of the period of remand or at such earlier time as the court may require; or

(b)where it is inquiring into or trying an offence alleged to have been committed by that person or has convicted him of an offence, remand him on bail in accordance with the M2Bail Act 1976, that is to say, by directing him to appear as provided in subsection (4) below; or

(c)except in a case falling within paragraph (b) above, remand him on bail by taking from him a recognizance (with or without sureties) conditioned as provided in that subsection;

and may, in a case falling within paragraph (c) above, instead of taking recognizances in accordance with that paragraph, fix the amount of the recognizances with a view to their being taken subsequently in accordance with section 119 above.

[F2(1A)Where—

(a)on adjourning a case under section 5, 10(1) [F3, 17C] or 18(4) above the court proposes to remand or further remand a person in custody; and

(b)he is before the court; and

F4(c). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(d)he is legally represented in that court,

it shall be the duty of the court—

(i)to explain the effect of subsections (3A) and (3B) below to him in ordinary language; and

(ii)to inform him in ordinary language that, notwithstanding the procedure for a remand without his being brought before a court, he would be brought before a court for the hearing and determination of at least every fourth application for his remand, and of every application for his remand heard at a time when it appeared to the court that he had no [F5legal representative]acting for him in the case.

(1B)For the purposes of subsection (1A) above a person is to be treated as legally represented in a court if, but only if, he has the assistance of [F6a legal representative] to represent him in the proceedings in that court.

(1C)After explaining to an accused as provided by subsection (1A) above the court shall ask him whether he consents to hearing and determination of such applications in his absence.]

(2)Where the court fixes the amount of a recognizance under subsection (1) above or section 8(3) of the M3Bail Act 1976 with a view to its being taken subsequently the court shall in the meantime commit the person so remanded to custody in accordance with paragraph (a) of the said subsection (1).

(3)Where a person is brought before the court after remand, the court may further remand him.

[F7(3A)Subject to subsection (3B) below, where a person has been remanded in custody [F8and the remand was not a remand under section 128A below for a period exceeding 8 clear days,], the court may further remand him [F8(otherwise than in the exercise of the power conferred by that section)]on an adjournment under section 5, 10(1) [F3, 17C] or 18(4) above without his being brought before it if it is satisfied—

(a)that he gave his consent, either in response to a question under subsection (1C) above or otherwise, to the hearing and determination in his absence of any application for his remand on an adjournment of the case under any of those provisions; and

(b)that he has not by virtue of this subsection been remanded without being brought before the court on more than two such applications immediately preceding the application which the court is hearing; and

F9(c). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(d)that he has not withdrawn his consent to their being so heard and determined.

(3B)The court may not exercise the power conferred by subsection (3A) above if it appears to the court, on an application for a further remand being made to it, that the person to whom the application relates has no [F10legal representative] acting for him in the case (whether present in court or not).

(3C)Where—

(a)a person has been remanded in custody on an adjournment of a case under section 5, 10(1) [F3, 17C] or 18(4) above; and

(b)an application is subsequently made for his further remand on such an adjournment; and

(c)he is not brought before the court which hears and determines the application; and

(d)that court is not satisfied as mentioned in subsection (3A) above,

the court shall adjourn the case and remand him in custody for the period for which it stands adjourned.

(3D)An adjournment under subsection (3C) above shall be for the shortest period that appears to the court to make it possible for the accused to be brought before it.

(3E)Where—

(a)on an adjournment of a case under section 5, 10(1) [F3, 17C] or 18(4) above a person has been remanded in custody without being brought before the court; and

(b)it subsequently appears—

(i)to the court which remanded him in custody; or

(ii)to an alternate magistrates’ court to which he is remanded under section 130 below,

that he ought not to have been remanded in custody in his absence, the court shall require him to be brought before it at the earliest time that appears to the court to be possible.]

(4)Where a person is remanded on bail under subsection (1) above the court may, where it remands him on bail in accordance with the Bail Act 1976 direct him to appear or, in any other case, direct that his recognizance be conditioned for his appearance—

(a)before that court at the end of the period of remand; or

(b)at every time and place to which during the course of the proceedings the hearing may be from time to time adjourned;

and, where it remands him on bail conditionally on his providing a surety during an inquiry into an offence alleged to have been committed by him, may direct that the recognizance of the surety be conditioned to secure that the person so bailed appears—

(c)at every time and place to which during the course of the proceedings the hearing may be from time to time adjourned and also before the Crown Court in the event of the person so bailed being committed for trial there.

(5)Where a person is directed to appear or a recognizance is conditioned for a person’s appearance in accordance with paragraph (b) or (c) of subsection (4) above, the fixing at any time of the time for him next to appear shall be deemed to be a remand; but nothing in this subsection or subsection (4) above shall deprive the court of power at any subsequent hearing to remand him afresh.

(6)Subject to the provisions of [F11sections 128A and] 129 below, a magistrates’ court shall not remand a person for a period exceeding 8 clear days, except that—

(a)if the court remands him on bail, it may remand him for a longer period if he and the other party consent;

(b)where the court adjourns a trial under section 10(3) [F12above or section 11 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000], the court may remand him for the period of the adjournment;

(c)where a person is charged with an offence triable either way, then, if it falls to the court to try the case summarily but the court is not at the time so constituted, and sitting in such a place, as will enable it to proceed with the trial, the court may remand him until the next occasion on which it will be practicable for the court to be so constituted, and to sit in such a place, as aforesaid, notwithstanding that the remand is for a period exceeding 8 clear days.

(7)A magistrates’ court having power to remand a person in custody may, if the remand is for a period not exceeding 3 clear days, commit him to [F13detention at a police station].

[F14(8)Where a person is committed to detention at a police station under subsection (7) above—

(a)he shall not be kept in such detention unless there is a need for him to be so detained for the purposes of inquiries into other offences;

(b)if kept in such detention, he shall be brought back before the magistrates’ court which committed him as soon as that need ceases;

(c)he shall be treated as a person in police detention to whom the duties under section 39 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (responsibilities in relation to persons detained) relate;

(d)his detention shall be subject to periodic review at the times set out in section 40 of that Act (review of police detention).]

Textual Amendments

F3Words in s. 128(1A)(3A)(3C)(3E) inserted (4.7.1996 with effect as mentioned in s. 49(6) of the inserting Act) by 1996 c. 25, s. 49(5)(a)(6) (with s. 78(1)); S.I. 1997/2199, art. 2

F4S. 128(1A)(C) repealed (4.7.1996 with effect as mentioned in s. 52(3)(4) of the repealing Act) by 1996 c. 25, ss. 52(1)(3), 80, Sch. 5 Table 4 (with s. 78(1)); S.I. 1997/36, art. 2

F9S. 128(3A)(c) repealed (4.7.1996 with effect as mentioned in s. 52(3)(4) of the repealing Act) by 1996 c. 25, ss. 52(1)(3), 80, Sch. 5 Table 4 (with s. 78(1)); S.I. 1997/36, art. 2

F11Words substituted by Criminal Justice Act 1988 (c. 33, SIF 39:1), ss. 123(6) 170(1), Sch. 15 para. 69(2)

F12Words in s. 128(6)(b) substituted (25.8.2000) by 2000 c. 6, ss. 165, 168(1), Sch. 9 para. 75

Modifications etc. (not altering text)

C2S. 128 restricted (30.9.1998) by 1998 c. 37, s. 47(3)(a); S.I. 1998/2327, art. 2(1)(k)

C3S. 128 applied (with modifications) (25.8.2000) by 2000 c. 6, ss. 9(2)(a), 10(3)(a), 168(1)

S. 128 modified (28.8.2000) by 1989 c. 37, s. 21C(4) (as inserted (28.8.2000) by 2000 c. 25, s. 1, Sch. 1 para. 4; S.I. 2000/2125, art. 2)

S. 128 modified (25.8.2000) by 2000 c. 6, ss. 28, 168(1), Sch. 1 Pt. I para. 4(4)

C5S. 128 applied (with modifications) (prosp.) by Street Offences Act 1959 (c. 57), Sch. para. 10(3) (as inserted by 2009 c. 26, ss. 17(4), 116(1), Sch. 1)

Marginal Citations

[F15128A Remands in custody for more than eight days.E+W

(1)The Secretary of State may by order made by statutory instrument provide that this section shall have effect—

(a)in an area specified in the order; or

(b)in proceedings of a description so specified,

in relation to any accused person (“the accused”) F16. . ..

(2)A magistrates’ court may remand the accused in custody for a period exceeding 8 clear days if—

(a)it has previously remanded him in custody for the same offence; and

(b)he is before the court,

but only if, after affording the parties an opportunity to make representations, it has set a date on which it expects that it will be possible for the next stage in the proceedings, other than a hearing relating to a further remand in custody or on bail, to take place, and only—

(i)for a period ending not later than that date; or

(ii)for a period of 28 clear days,

whichever is the less.

(3)Nothing in this section affects the right of the accused to apply for bail during the period of the remand.

(4)A statutory instrument containing an order under this section shall not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before Parliament and been approved by a resolution of each House.]

Textual Amendments

F16Words in s. 128(A)(1) repealed (4.7.1996 with effect as mentioned in s. 52(3)(4) of the repealing Act) by 1996 c. 25, ss. 52(2), 80, Sch. 5 para. 2 Table 4 (with s. 78(1)); S.I. 1997/36, art.2

Modifications etc. (not altering text)

C7S. 128A extended (2.12.1991) by S.I. 1991/2667, art. 2

129 Further remand.E+W

(1)If a magistrates’ court is satisfied that any person who has been remanded is unable by reason of illness or accident to appear or be brought before the court at the expiration of the period for which he was remanded, the court may, in his absence, remand him for a further time; and section 128(6) above shall not apply.

(2)Notwithstanding anything in section 128(1) above, the power of a court under subsection (1) above to remand a person on bail for a further time—

(a)where he was granted bail in criminal proceedings, includes power to enlarge the recognizance of any surety for him to a later time;

(b)where he was granted bail otherwise than in criminal proceedings, may be exercised by enlarging his recognizance and those of any sureties for him to a later time.

(3)Where a person remanded on bail is bound to appear before a magistrates’ court at any time and the court has no power to remand him under subsection (1) above, the court may in his absence—

(a)where he was granted bail in criminal proceedings, appoint a later time as the time at which he is to appear and enlarge the recognizances of any sureties for him to that time;

(b)where he was granted bail otherwise than in criminal proceedings, enlarge his recognizance and those of any sureties for him to a later time;

and the appointment of the time or the enlargement of his recognizance shall be deemed to be a further remand.

(4)Where a magistrates’ court [F17sends a person to the Crown Court] for trial on bail and the recognizance of any surety for him has been conditioned in accordance with paragraph (a) of subsection (4) of section 128 above the court may, in the absence of the surety, enlarge his recognizance so that he is bound to secure that the person so [F18sent] for trial appears also before the Crown Court.

Textual Amendments

F17Words in s. 129(4) substituted (9.5.2005 for certain purposes, otherwise prosp.) by Criminal Justice Act 2003 (c. 44), ss. 41, 336, Sch. 3 Pt. 2 para. 51(8)(a); S.I. 2005/1267, art. 2, Sch. Pt. 1

F18Word in s. 129(4) substituted (9.5.2005 for certain purposes, otherwise prosp.) by Criminal Justice Act 2003 (c. 44), ss. 41, 336, Sch. 3 Pt. 2 para. 51(8)(b); S.I. 2005/1267, art. 2, Sch. Pt. 1

130 Transfer of remand hearings.E+W

(1)A magistrates’ court adjourning a case under section 5, 10(1) [F19, 17C] or 18(4) above, and remanding the accused in custody, may, if he has attained the age of 17, order that he be brought up for any subsequent remands before an alternate magistrates’ court nearer to the prison where he is to be confined while on remand.

(2)The order shall require the accused to be brought before the alternate court at the end of the period of remand or at such earlier time as the alternate court may require.

(3)While the order is in force, the alternate court shall, to the exclusion of the court which made the order, have all the powers in relation to further remand (whether in custody or on bail) and [F20the grant of a right to representation funded by the Legal Services Commission as part of the Criminal Defence Service] which that court would have had but for the order.

(4)The alternate court may, on remanding the accused in custody, require him to be brought before the court which made the order at the end of the period of remand or at such earlier time as that court may require; and, if the alternate court does so, or the accused is released on bail, the order under subsection (1) above shall cease to be in force.

[F21(4A)Where a magistrates’ court is satisfied as mentioned in section 128(3A) above—

(a)subsection (1) above shall have effect as if for the words “he be brought up for any subsequent remands before” there were substituted the words “applications for any subsequent remands be made to”;

(b)subsection (2) above shall have effect as if for the words “the accused to be brought before” there were substituted the words “an application for a further remand to be made to” and

(c)subsection (4) above shall have effect as if for the words “him to be brought before” there were substituted the words “an application for a further remand to be made to”.]

(5)Schedule 5 to this Act shall have effect to supplement this section.

Textual Amendments

F19Words in s. 130(1) inserted (4.7.1996 with effect as mentioned in s. 49(6) of the inserting Act) by 1996 c. 25, s. 49(5)(b)(6) (with s. 78(1)); S.I. 1997/2199, art. 2

F20Words in s. 130(3) substituted (2.4.2001) by 1999 c. 22, s. 24, Sch. 4 paras. 15, 18 (with s. 107, Sch. 14 para. 7(2)); S.I. 2001/916, art. 3(a)(ii) (with Sch. 2 para. 2)

131 Remand of accused already in custody.E+W

(1)When a magistrates’ court remands an accused person in custody and he is already detained under a custodial sentence, the period for which he is remanded may be up to 28 clear days.

(2)But the court shall inquire as to the expected date of his release from that detention; and if it appears that it will be before 28 clear days have expired, he shall not be remanded in custody for more than 8 clear days or (if longer) a period ending with that date.

[F22(2A)Where the accused person is serving a sentence of imprisonment to which an intermittent custody order under section 183 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 relates, the reference in subsection (2) to the expected date of his release is to be read as a reference to the expected date of his next release on licence.]

(3). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F23

Textual Amendments

Modifications etc. (not altering text)

C9S. 131 modified (25.1.2010) by Extradition Act 2003 (c. 41), s. 76B(3)(a) (as inserted by 2009 c. 26, ss. 70, 116(1); S.I. 2009/3096, art. 3(m) (with art. 4))