- Latest available (Revised)
- Point in Time (12/03/2015)
- Original (As enacted)
Point in time view as at 12/03/2015.
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Video Recordings Act 1984, Cross Heading: Offences and penalties.
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
[F1(1)A person who supplies or offers to supply a video recording containing a video work in respect of which no classification certificate has been issued is guilty of an offence unless—
(a)the supply is, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply, or
(b)the video work is an exempted work.
(2)It is a defence to a charge of committing an offence under this section to prove that the accused believed on reasonable grounds—
(a)that the video work concerned or, if the video recording contained more than one work to which the charge relates, each of those works was either an exempted work or a work in respect of which a classification certificate had been issued, or
(b)that the supply was, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply by virtue of section 3(4) or (5) of this Act.
[F2(3)A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable—
(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or a fine or both,
(b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or [F3a fine not exceeding £20,000[F3a fine]] or both.]]
Textual Amendments
F1Ss. 1-17 repealed and revived (21.1.2010) by Video Recordings Act 2010 (c. 1), ss. 1(1), 2(2) (with Sch. paras. 2(2), 6)
F2S. 9(3) inserted (3.2.1995) by 1994 c. 33, s. 88(2)(7); S.I. 1995/127, art. 2, Sch. 1
F3Words in s. 9(3)(b) substituted (E.W.) (12.3.2015) by The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (Fines on Summary Conviction) Regulations 2015 (S.I. 2015/664), reg. 1(1), Sch. 4 para. 14(2) (with reg. 5(1))
[F1(1)Where a video recording contains a video work in respect of which no classification certificate has been issued, a person who has the recording in his possession for the purpose of supplying it is guilty of an offence unless—
(a)he has it in his possession for the purpose only of a supply which, if it took place, would be an exempted supply, or
(b)the video work is an exempted work.
(2)It is a defence to a charge of committing an offence under this section to prove—
(a)that the accused believed on reasonable grounds that the video work concerned or, if the video recording contained more than one work to which the charge relates, each of those works was either an exempted work or a work in respect of which a classification certificate had been issued,
(b)that the accused had the video recording in his possession for the purpose only of a supply which he believed on reasonable grounds would, if it took place, be an exempted supply by virtue of section 3(4) or (5) of this Act, or
(c)that the accused did not intend to supply the video recording until a classification certificate had been issued in respect of the video work concerned.
[F4(3)A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable—
(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or a fine or both,
(b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or [F5a fine not exceeding £20,000[F5a fine]] or both.]]
Textual Amendments
F1Ss. 1-17 repealed and revived (21.1.2010) by Video Recordings Act 2010 (c. 1), ss. 1(1), 2(2) (with Sch. paras. 2(2), 6)
F4S. 10(3) inserted (3.2.1995) by 1994 c. 33, s. 88(3)(7); S.I. 1995/127, art. 2, Sch. 1
F5Words in s. 10(3)(b) substituted (E.W.) (12.3.2015) by The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (Fines on Summary Conviction) Regulations 2015 (S.I. 2015/664), reg. 1(1), Sch. 4 para. 14(3) (with reg. 5(1))
[F1(1)Where a classification certificate issued in respect of a video work states that no video recording [F6, or no video recording described in the certificate, that contains] that work is to be supplied to any person who has not attained the age specified in the certificate, a person who supplies or offers to supply [F7such a video recording] to a person who has not attained the age so specified is guilty of an offence unless
[F8(a)the video work is an exempted work, or
(b)the supply is, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply.]
(2)It is a defence to a charge of committing an offence under this section to prove—
(a)that the accused neither knew nor had reasonable grounds to believe that the classification certificate contained the statement concerned,
(b)that the accused neither knew nor had reasonable grounds to believe that the person concerned had not attained that age,
[F9(ba)that the accused believed on reasonable grounds that the video work concerned or, if the video recording contained more than one work to which the charge relates, each of those works was an exempted work,] or
(c)that the accused believed on reasonable grounds that the supply was, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply by virtue of section 3(4) or (5) of this Act.
[F10(3)A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale or both.]]
Textual Amendments
F1Ss. 1-17 repealed and revived (21.1.2010) by Video Recordings Act 2010 (c. 1), ss. 1(1), 2(2) (with Sch. paras. 2(2), 6)
F6Words in s. 11(1) substituted (1.5.2012) by Digital Economy Act 2010 (c. 24), s. 47(3)(c), Sch. 1 para. 6(2)(a); S.I. 2012/1164, art. 2(b)
F7Words in s. 11(1) substituted (1.5.2012) by Digital Economy Act 2010 (c. 24), s. 47(3)(c), Sch. 1 para. 6(2)(b); S.I. 2012/1164, art. 2(b)
F8Words in s. 11(1) inserted (1.5.2012) by Digital Economy Act 2010 (c. 24), s. 47(3)(c), Sch. 1 para. 6(2)(c); S.I. 2012/1164, art. 2(b)
F9S. 11(2)(ba) inserted (1.5.2012) by Digital Economy Act 2010 (c. 24), s. 47(3)(c), Sch. 1 para. 6(3); S.I. 2012/1164, art. 2(b)
F10S. 11(3) inserted (3.2.1995) by 1994 c. 33, s. 88(4)(7); S.I. 1995/127, art. 2, Sch. 1
[F1(1)Where a classification certificate issued in respect of a video work states that no video recording [F11, or no video recording described in the certificate, that contains ] that work is to be supplied other than in a licensed sex shop, a person who at any place other than in a sex shop for which a licence is in force under the relevant enactment—
(a)supplies [F12such a video recording], or
(b)offers to do so,
is guilty of an offence unless the supply is, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply.
(2)It is a defence to a charge of committing an offence under subsection (1) above to prove—
(a)that the accused neither knew nor had reasonable grounds to believe that the classification certificate contained the statement concerned,
(b)that the accused believed on reasonable grounds that the place concerned was a sex shop for which a licence was in force under the relevant enactment, or
(c)that the accused believed on reasonable grounds that the supply was, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply by virtue of section 3(4) of this Act or subsection (6) below.
(3)Where a classification certificate issued in respect of a video work states that no video recording [F13, or no video recording described in the certificate, that contains ] that work is to be supplied other than in a licensed sex shop, a person who has [F14such a video recording] in his possession for the purpose of supplying it at any place other than in such a sex shop is guilty of an offence, unless he has it in his possession for the purpose only of a supply which, if it took place, would be an exempted supply.
(4)It is a defence to a charge of committing an offence under subsection (3) above to prove—
(a)that the accused neither knew nor had reasonable grounds to believe that the classification certificate contained the statement concerned,
(b)that the accused believed on reasonable grounds that the place concerned was a sex shop for which a licence was in force under the relevant enactment, or
(c)that the accused had the video recording in his possession for the purpose only of a supply which he believed on reasonable grounds would, if it took place, be an exempted supply by virtue of section 3(4) of this Act or subsection (6) below.
[F15(4A)A person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) or (3) above shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale or both.]
(5) In this section “ relevant enactment ” means Schedule 3 to the M1 Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1982 or, in Scotland, Schedule 2 to the M2 Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 [F16 or, in Northern Ireland, Schedule 2 to the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Northern Ireland) Order 1985 ] , and “ sex shop ” has the same meaning as in the relevant enactment.
(6)For the purposes of this section, where a classification certificate issued in respect of a video work states that no video recording [F17, or no video recording described in the certificate, that contains] that work is to be supplied other than in a licensed sex shop, the supply of [F18such a video recording]—
(a)to a person who, in the course of a business, makes video works or supplies video recordings, and
(b)with a view to its eventual supply in sex shops, being sex shops for which licences are in force under the relevant enactment,
is an exempted supply.]
Textual Amendments
F1Ss. 1-17 repealed and revived (21.1.2010) by Video Recordings Act 2010 (c. 1), ss. 1(1), 2(2) (with Sch. paras. 2(2), 6)
F11Word in s. 12(1) substituted (1.5.2012) by Digital Economy Act 2010 (c. 24), s. 47(3)(c), Sch. 1 para. 7(2)(a); S.I. 2012/1164, art. 2(b)
F12Words in s. 12(1)(a) substituted (1.5.2012) by Digital Economy Act 2010 (c. 24), s. 47(3)(c), Sch. 1 para. 7(2)(b); S.I. 2012/1164, art. 2(b)
F13Word in s. 12(3) substituted (1.5.2012) by Digital Economy Act 2010 (c. 24), s. 47(3)(c), Sch. 1 para. 7(2)(a); S.I. 2012/1164, art. 2(b)
F14Words in s. 12(3) substituted (1.5.2012) by Digital Economy Act 2010 (c. 24), s. 47(3)(c), Sch. 1 para. 7(2)(b); S.I. 2012/1164, art. 2(b)
F15S. 12(4A) inserted (3.2.1995) by 1994 c. 33, s. 88(5)(7); S.I. 1995/127 art. 1, Sch. 1
F16Words inserted by S.I. 1985/1208 (N.I. 15), art. 42, Sch. 4
F17Word in s. 12(6) substituted (1.5.2012) by Digital Economy Act 2010 (c. 24), s. 47(3)(c), Sch. 1 para. 7(3)(a); S.I. 2012/1164, art. 2(b)
F18Words in s. 12(6) substituted (1.5.2012) by Digital Economy Act 2010 (c. 24), s. 47(3)(c), Sch. 1 para. 7(3)(b); S.I. 2012/1164, art. 2(b)
Marginal Citations
[F1(1)A person who supplies or offers to supply a video recording or any spool, case or other thing on or in which the recording is kept which does not satisfy any requirement imposed by regulations under section 8 of this Act is guilty of an offence unless
[F19(a)the video work is an exempted work, or
(b)the supply is, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply.]
(2)It is a defence to a charge of committing an offence under this section to prove that the accused—
[F20(za)believed on reasonable grounds that the video work concerned or, if the video recording contained more than one work to which the charge relates, each of those works was an exempted work,]
(a)believed on reasonable grounds that the supply was, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply by virtue of section 3(4) or (5) of this Act, or
(b)neither knew nor had reasonable grounds to believe that the recording, spool, case or other thing (as the case may be) did not satisfy the requirement concerned.
[F21(3)A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale.]]
Textual Amendments
F1Ss. 1-17 repealed and revived (21.1.2010) by Video Recordings Act 2010 (c. 1), ss. 1(1), 2(2) (with Sch. paras. 2(2), 6)
F19Words in s. 13(1) inserted (1.5.2012) by Digital Economy Act 2010 (c. 24), s. 47(3)(c), Sch. 1 para. 8(2); S.I. 2012/1164, art. 2(b)
F20S. 13(2)(za) inserted (1.5.2012) by Digital Economy Act 2010 (c. 24), s. 47(3)(c), Sch. 1 para. 8(3); S.I. 2012/1164, art. 2(b)
F21S. 13(3) inserted (3.2.1995) by 1994 c. 33, s. 168(2), Sch. 10 para. 52(2); S.I. 1995/127, art. 2, Sch. 1
[F1(1)A person who supplies or offers to supply a video recording containing a video work in respect of which no classification certificate has been issued is guilty of an offence if the video recording or any spool, case or other thing on or in which the recording is kept contains any indication that a classification certificate has been issued in respect of that work unless
[F22(a)the video work is an exempted work, or
(b)the supply is, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply.]
(2)It is a defence to a charge of committing an offence under subsection (1) above to prove—
(a)that the accused believed on reasonable grounds—
(i)that a classification certificate had been issued in respect of the video work concerned
[F23(ia)that the video work concerned or, if the video recording contained more than one work to which the charge relates, each of those works was an exempted work,], or
(ii)that the supply was, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply by virtue of section 3(4) or (5) of this Act, or
(b)that the accused neither knew nor had reasonable grounds to believe that the recording, spool, case or other thing (as the case may be) contained the indication concerned.
(3)A person who supplies or offers to supply a video recording containing a video work in respect of which a classification certificate has been issued is guilty of an offence if the video recording or any spool, case or other thing on or in which the recording is kept contains any indication that is false in a material particular of any statement falling within section 7(2) of this Act (including any advice falling within paragraph (a) of that subsection) contained in the certificate, unless
[F24(a)the video work is an exempted work, or
(b)the supply is, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply.]
(4)It is a defence to a charge of committing an offence under subsection (3) above to prove—
(a)that the accused believed on reasonable grounds—
[F25(ai)that the video work concerned or, if the video recording contained more than one work to which the charge relates, each of those works was an exempted work,]
(i)that the supply was, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply by virtue of section 3(4) or (5) of this Act, or
(ii)that the certificate concerned contained the statement indicated, or
(b)that the accused neither knew nor had reasonable grounds to believe that the recording, spool, case or other thing (as the case may be) contained the indication concerned.
[F26(5)A person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) or (3) above shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale or both.]]
Textual Amendments
F1Ss. 1-17 repealed and revived (21.1.2010) by Video Recordings Act 2010 (c. 1), ss. 1(1), 2(2) (with Sch. paras. 2(2), 6)
F22Words in s. 14(1) inserted (1.5.2012) by Digital Economy Act 2010 (c. 24), s. 47(3)(c), Sch. 1 para. 9(2); S.I. 2012/1164, art. 2(b)
F23S. 14(2)(a)(ia) inserted (1.5.2012) by Digital Economy Act 2010 (c. 24), s. 47(3)(c), Sch. 1 para. 9(3); S.I. 2012/1164, art. 2(b)
F24Words in s. 14(3) inserted (1.5.2012) by Digital Economy Act 2010 (c. 24), s. 47(3)(c), Sch. 1 para. 9(4)(a); S.I. 2012/1164, art. 2(b)
F25S. 14(4)(a)(ai) inserted (1.5.2012) by Digital Economy Act 2010 (c. 24), s. 47(3)(c), Sch. 1 para. 9(5); S.I. 2012/1164, art. 2(b)
F26S. 14(5) inserted (3.2.1995) by 1994 c. 33, s. 88(6)(7); S.I. 1995/127, art. 2, Sch. 1
[F1Without prejudice to any defence specified in the preceding provisions of this Act in relation to a particular offence, it is a defence to a charge of committing any offence under this Act to prove—
(a)that the commission of the offence was due to the act or default of a person other than the accused, and
(b)that the accused took all reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence to avoid the commission of the offence by any person under his control.]]
Textual Amendments
F1Ss. 1-17 repealed and revived (21.1.2010) by Video Recordings Act 2010 (c. 1), ss. 1(1), 2(2) (with Sch. paras. 2(2), 6)
F27S. 14A inserted (20.09.1993) by 1993 c. 24, ss. 2, 6(2).
[F1(1)No prosecution for an offence under this Act shall be brought after the expiry of the period of three years beginning with the date of the commission of the offence or one year beginning with the date of its discovery by the prosecutor, whichever is earlier.
(2)In Scotland, the reference in subsection (1) above to the date of discovery by the prosecutor shall be construed as a reference to the date on which evidence sufficient in the opinion of the Lord Advocate to warrant proceedings came to his knowledge.
(3)For the purposes of subsection (2) above—
(a)a certificate signed by the Lord Advocate or on his behalf and stating the date on which evidence came to his knowledge shall be conclusive evidence of that fact;
(b)a certificate purporting to be signed as mentioned in paragraph (a) above shall be presumed to be so signed unless the contrary is proved; and
(c)a prosecution shall be deemed to be brought on the date on which a warrant to apprehend or to cite the accused is granted provided that the warrant is executed without undue delay.]]
Textual Amendments
F1Ss. 1-17 repealed and revived (21.1.2010) by Video Recordings Act 2010 (c. 1), ss. 1(1), 2(2) (with Sch. paras. 2(2), 6)
F28S. 15 substituted (3.2.1995) by 1994 c. 33, s. 168(2), Sch. 10 para. 52(3); S.I. 1995/127, art. 2, Sch. 1
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As Enacted or Made): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was enacted or made. No changes have been applied to the text.
Point in Time: This becomes available after navigating to view revised legislation as it stood at a certain point in time via Advanced Features > Show Timeline of Changes or via a point in time advanced search.
Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.
Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: