SCHEDULES

F2C1C2SCHEDULE A1 Moratorium where directors propose voluntary arrangement

Annotations:
Amendments (Textual)
F2

Sch. A1 inserted (11.5.2001 so far as is necessary to give effect to Sch. A1 paras. 5, 45(1)-(3)(5) and 1.1.2003 in so far as not already in force) by 2000 c. 39, s. 1, Sch. 1 para. 4; S.I. 2001/1751, art. 2; S.I. 2002/2711, art. 2 (subject to transitional provisions in arts. 3-5)

Modifications etc. (not altering text)
C1

Sch. A1 applied (with modifications) (E.W.) (1.1.2003) by S.I. 1994/2421, art. 4(1), Sch. 1 (as amended (1.1.2003) by S.I. 2002/2708, arts. 4-6 (with transitional provisions in art. 11) and (1.7.2005) by S.I. 2005/1516, art. 6)

Part V Consideration and implementation of voluntary arrangement

Effectiveness of decisions

F136

1

Sub-paragraph (2) applies to references to one of the following decisions having effect, that is, a decision, under paragraph 31, 32 or 35, with respect to—

a

the approval of a proposed voluntary arrangement,

b

the extension (or further extension) of a moratorium,

c

the bringing of a moratorium to an end,

d

the establishment of a committee, or

e

the approval of the expected cost of a nominee’s intended actions.

2

The decision has effect if, in accordance with the rules—

a

it has been taken by both meetings summoned under paragraph 29, or

b

(subject to any order made under sub-paragraph (5)) it has been taken by the creditors’ meeting summoned under that paragraph.

3

If a decision taken by the creditors’ meeting under any of paragraphs 31, 32 or 35 with respect to any of the matters mentioned in sub-paragraph (1) differs from one so taken by the company meeting with respect to that matter, a member of the company may apply to the court.

4

An application under sub-paragraph (3) shall not be made after the end of the period of 28 days beginning with—

a

the day on which the decision was taken by the creditors’ meeting, or

b

where the decision of the company meeting was taken on a later day, that day.

5

On an application under sub-paragraph (3), the court may—

a

order the decision of the company meeting to have effect instead of the decision of the creditors’ meeting, or

b

make such other order as it thinks fit.