F1SCHEDULE A1 Moratorium where directors propose voluntary arrangement
Part V Consideration and implementation of voluntary arrangement
Challenge of decisions
38
(1)
Subject to the following provisions of this paragraph, any of the persons mentioned in sub-paragraph (2) may apply to the court on one or both of the following grounds—
(a)
F4(1A)
In this paragraph—
(a)
the “relevant qualifying decision procedure” means the qualifying decision procedure in which the creditors decided whether to approve the voluntary arrangement;
(b)
references to a decision made in the relevant qualifying decision procedure include any other decision made in that qualifying decision procedure.
(2)
The persons who may apply under this paragraph are—
(a)
(b)
(c)
the nominee.
(3)
An application under this paragraph shall not be made—
(a)
after the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the first day on which each of the reports required by paragraph 30(3) F7and (4) has been made to the court, or
(b)
but (subject to that) an application made by a person within sub-paragraph (2)(b) on the ground that the arrangement prejudices his interests may be made after the arrangement has ceased to have effect, unless it came to an end prematurely.
(4)
Where on an application under this paragraph the court is satisfied as to either of the grounds mentioned in sub-paragraph (1), it may do any of the following—
(a)
revoke or suspend—
(i)
any decision approving the voluntary arrangement which has effect under paragraph 36, or
(b)
give a direction to any person—
(i)
F14(c)
direct any person—
(i)
to seek a decision from the company's creditors (using a qualifying decision procedure) as to whether they approve any revised proposal for a voluntary arrangement which the directors may make, or
(ii)
in a case falling within sub-paragraph (1)(b) and relating to the relevant qualifying decision procedure, to seek a decision from the company's creditors (using a qualifying decision procedure) as to whether they approve the original proposal.
(5)
Where at any time after giving a direction under sub-paragraph (4)(b)(i) F15or (c)(i) the court is satisfied that the directors do not intend to submit a revised proposal, the court shall revoke the direction and revoke or suspend any decision approving the voluntary arrangement which has effect under paragraph 36.
(6)
Where the court gives a direction under sub-paragraph (4)(b) F16or (c) , it may also give a direction continuing or, as the case may require, renewing, for such period as may be specified in the direction, the effect of the moratorium.
(7)
Sub-paragraph (8) applies in a case where the court, on an application under this paragraph—
(a)
gives a direction under sub-paragraph (4)(b) F17or (c) , or
(b)
revokes or suspends a decision under sub-paragraph (4)(a) or (5).
(8)
In such a case, the court may give such supplemental directions as it thinks fit and, in particular, directions with respect to—
(a)
things done under the voluntary arrangement since it took effect, and
(b)
such things done since that time as could not have been done if a moratorium had been in force in relation to the company when they were done.
(9)
Except in pursuance of the preceding provisions of this paragraph,
F18(a)
(b)
a decision of the company's creditors made in the relevant qualifying decision procedure is not invalidated by any irregularity in relation to the relevant qualifying decision procedure.