SCHEDULES

F1C2C3C4SCHEDULE B1 ADMINISTRATION

Annotations:
Amendments (Textual)
F1

Sch. B1 inserted (15.9.2003) by 2002 c. 40, ss. 248(2), 279, Sch. 16 (with s. 249(1)-(3)(6)); S.I. 2003/2093, art. 2(1), Sch. 1 (subject to arts. 3-8 (as amended by S.I. 2003/2332, art. 2))

Modifications etc. (not altering text)
C2

Sch. B1 applied in part (with modifications) (5.10.2004) by Energy Act 2004 (c. 20), ss. 159(1), 198, Sch. 20 Pts. 1-3; S.I. 2004/2575, art. 2(1), Sch. 1

C3

Sch. B1 applied (with modifications) (1.7. 2005) by S.I. 1994/2421, art. 6(1), Sch. 2 (as amended (1.7.2005) by S.I. 2005/1516, arts. 3, 7, Sch. 1 (with art. 2))

C4

Sch. B1: specified provisions applied (with modifications) (1.10.2011) by Postal Services Act 2011 (c. 5), ss. 73, 93(2)(3), {Sch. 10 Pts. 1, 2}; S.I. 2011/2329, art. 3 (with arts. 4, 5)

FUNCTIONS OF ADMINISTRATOR

C175Misfeasance

1

The court may examine the conduct of a person who—

a

is or purports to be the administrator of a company, or

b

has been or has purported to be the administrator of a company.

2

An examination under this paragraph may be held only on the application of—

a

the official receiver,

b

the administrator of the company,

c

the liquidator of the company,

d

a creditor of the company, or

e

a contributory of the company.

3

An application under sub-paragraph (2) must allege that the administrator—

a

has misapplied or retained money or other property of the company,

b

has become accountable for money or other property of the company,

c

has breached a fiduciary or other duty in relation to the company, or

d

has been guilty of misfeasance.

4

On an examination under this paragraph into a person’s conduct the court may order him—

a

to repay, restore or account for money or property;

b

to pay interest;

c

to contribute a sum to the company’s property by way of compensation for breach of duty or misfeasance.

5

In sub-paragraph (3) “administrator” includes a person who purports or has purported to be a company’s administrator.

6

An application under sub-paragraph (2) may be made in respect of an administrator who has been discharged under paragraph 98 only with the permission of the court.