Modifications etc. (not altering text)
C1Pt. 3 modified by S.I. 1989/1100, arts. 3-9, Sch.
Textual Amendments
F1S. 253 253 and crossheading substituted for (1.10.2017) by Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Act 2017 (c. 14), ss. 5(2), 8 (with art. 7(4)); S.I. 2017/771, reg. 2(1)(b) (with reg. 3)
(1)A communication contains a “threat of infringement proceedings” if a reasonable person in the position of a recipient would understand from the communication that—
(a)design right subsists in a design, and
(b)a person intends to bring proceedings (whether in a court in the United Kingdom or elsewhere) against another person for infringement of the design right by—
(i)an act done in the United Kingdom, or
(ii)an act which, if done, would be done in the United Kingdom.
(2)References in this section and in section 253C to a “recipient” include, in the case of a communication directed to the public or a section of the public, references to a person to whom the communication is directed.
(1)Subject to subsections (2) to (5), a threat of infringement proceedings made by any person is actionable by any person aggrieved by the threat.
(2)A threat of infringement proceedings is not actionable if the infringement is alleged to consist of—
(a)making an article for disposal, or
(b)importing an article for disposal.
(3)A threat of infringement proceedings is not actionable if the infringement is alleged to consist of an act which, if done, would constitute an infringement of a kind mentioned in subsection (2)(a) or (b).
(4)A threat of infringement proceedings is not actionable if the threat—
(a)is made to a person who has done, or intends to do, an act mentioned in subsection (2)(a) or (b) in relation to an article, and
(b)is a threat of proceedings for an infringement alleged to consist of doing anything else in relation to that article.
(5)A threat of infringement proceedings which is not an express threat is not actionable if it is contained in a permitted communication.
(6)In sections 253C and 253D an “actionable threat” means a threat of infringement proceedings that is actionable in accordance with this section.
(1)For the purposes of section 253A(5), a communication containing a threat of infringement proceedings is a “permitted communication” if—
(a)the communication, so far as it contains information that relates to the threat, is made for a permitted purpose;
(b)all of the information that relates to the threat is information that—
(i)is necessary for that purpose (see subsection (5)(a) to (c) for some examples of necessary information), and
(ii)the person making the communication reasonably believes is true.
(2)Each of the following is a “permitted purpose”—
(a)giving notice that design right subsists in a design;
(b)discovering whether, or by whom, design right in a design has been infringed by an act mentioned in section 253A(2)(a) or (b);
(c)giving notice that a person has a right in or under the design right in a design, where another person's awareness of the right is relevant to any proceedings that may be brought in respect of the design right in the design.
(3)The court may, having regard to the nature of the purposes listed in subsection (2)(a) to (c), treat any other purpose as a “permitted purpose” if it considers that it is in the interests of justice to do so.
(4)But the following may not be treated as a “permitted purpose”—
(a)requesting a person to cease doing, for commercial purposes, anything in relation to an article made to a design,
(b)requesting a person to deliver up or destroy an article made to a design, or
(c)requesting a person to give an undertaking relating to an article made to a design.
(5)If any of the following information is included in a communication made for a permitted purpose, it is information that is “necessary for that purpose” (see subsection (1)(b)(i))—
(a)a statement that design right subsists in a design;
(b)details of the design, or of a right in or under the design right in the design, which—
(i)are accurate in all material respects, and
(ii)are not misleading in any material respect; and
(c)information enabling the identification of articles that are alleged to be infringing articles in relation to the design.
(1)Proceedings in respect of an actionable threat may be brought against the person who made the threat for—
(a)a declaration that the threat is unjustified;
(b)an injunction against the continuance of the threat;
(c)damages in respect of any loss sustained by the aggrieved person by reason of the threat.
(2)It is a defence for the person who made the threat to show that the act in respect of which proceedings were threatened constitutes (or if done would constitute) an infringement of design right.
(3)It is a defence for the person who made the threat to show—
(a)that, despite having taken reasonable steps, the person has not identified anyone who has done an act mentioned in section 253A(2)(a) or (b) in relation to the article which is the subject of the threat, and
(b)that the person notified the recipient, before or at the time of making the threat, of the steps taken.
(1)Proceedings in respect of an actionable threat may not be brought against a professional adviser (or any person vicariously liable for the actions of that professional adviser) if the conditions in subsection (3) are met.
(2)In this section “professional adviser” means a person who, in relation to the making of the communication containing the threat—
(a)is acting in a professional capacity in providing legal services or the services of a trade mark attorney or a patent attorney, and
(b)is regulated in the provision of legal services, or the services of a trade mark attorney or a patent attorney, by one or more regulatory bodies (whether through membership of a regulatory body, the issue of a licence to practise or any other means).
(3)The conditions are that—
(a)in making the communication the professional adviser is acting on the instructions of another person, and
(b)when the communication is made the professional adviser identifies the person on whose instructions the adviser is acting.
(4)This section does not affect any liability of the person on whose instructions the professional adviser is acting.
(5)It is for a person asserting that subsection (1) applies to prove (if required) that at the material time—
(a)the person concerned was acting as a professional adviser, and
(b)the conditions in subsection (3) were met.
In section 253(1)(b) the reference to proceedings for infringement of design right includes a reference to—
(a)proceedings for an order under section 230 (order for delivery up), and
(b)proceedings for an order under section 231 (order as to disposal of infringing articles).]