SCHEDULE 14 Supervisory and qualifying bodies: Restrictive practices
Part II Consequential Exemptions from Competition Law
Fair Trading Act 1973 (c. 41)
8
(1)
For the purpose of determining whether a monopoly situation within the meaning of the Fair Trading Act 1973 exists by reason of the circumstances mentioned in section 7(1)(c) of that Act (supply of services by or for group of two or more persons), no account shall be taken of—
(a)
the rules of or guidance issued by a recognised supervisory or qualifying body, or
(b)
conduct constituting such a practice as is mentioned in paragraph 3(4) above.
(2)
Where a recognition order is revoked there shall be disregarded for the purpose mentioned in sub-paragraph (1) any such conduct as is mentioned in that sub-paragraph which occurred while the order was in force.
(3)
Where on a monopoly reference under section 50 or 51 of the Fair Trading Act 1973 falling within section 49 of that Act (monopoly reference not limited to the facts) the Monopolies and Mergers Commission find that a monopoly situation within the meaning of that Act exists and—
(a)
that the person (or, if more than one, any of the persons) in whose favour it exists is—
(i)
a recognised supervisory or qualifying body, or
(ii)
a person of a description mentioned in paragraph 3(5) or (6) above, or
(b)
that any such person’s conduct in doing anything to which the rules of such a body relate is subject to guidance issued by the body,
the Commission in making their report on that reference shall exclude from their consideration the question whether the rules or guidance of the body concerned, or the acts or omissions of that body in its capacity as such, operate or may be expected to operate against the public interest.