Search Legislation

Water Industry Act 1991

 Help about what version

What Version

 Help about advanced features

Advanced Features

 Help about opening options

Opening OptionsExpand opening options

Changes over time for: Paragraph 3

 Help about opening options

Alternative versions:

Status:

Point in time view as at 01/04/2018.

Changes to legislation:

There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Water Industry Act 1991. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. Help about Changes to Legislation

[F13(1)The first questions to be decided by the [F2CMA] on a merger reference under section 32(a) of this Act shall be—U.K.

(a)whether arrangements are in progress which, if carried into effect, will result in a water merger; and

(b)if so, whether that merger may be expected to prejudice the ability of [F3the Authority], in carrying out [F3its] functions by virtue of this Act, to make comparisons between different water enterprises.

(2)The first questions to be decided by the [F2CMA] on a merger reference under section 32(b) of this Act shall be—

(a)whether a water merger has taken place; and

(b)if so, whether that merger has prejudiced, or may be expected to prejudice, the ability of [F3the Authority], in carrying out [F3its] functions by virtue of this Act, to make comparisons between different water enterprises.

(3)Any decision of the [F4CMA] on a merger reference under section 32(a) of this Act that arrangements are in progress which, if carried into effect, will result in a water merger shall be treated as a decision that no arrangements are in progress which, if carried into effect, will result in a water merger if the decision is not that of at least two-thirds of the members of the group constituted in connection with the reference [F5under Schedule 4 to the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013] .

(4)Any decision of the [F4CMA] on a merger reference under section 32(a) of this Act that a water merger may be expected to prejudice the ability of [F3the Authority], in carrying out [F3its] functions by virtue of this Act, to make comparisons between different water enterprises shall be treated as a decision that the water merger may be expected not to prejudice that ability of [F3the Authority] if the decision is not that of at least two-thirds of the members of the group constituted in connection with the reference [F5under Schedule 4 to the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013] .

(5)Any decision of the [F4CMA] on a merger reference under section 32(b) of this Act that a water merger has taken place shall be treated as a decision that no water merger has taken place if the decision is not that of at least two-thirds of the members of the group constituted in connection with the reference in [F5under Schedule 4 to the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013] .

(6)Any decision of the [F4CMA] on a merger reference under section 32(b) of this Act that a water merger has prejudiced, or may be expected to prejudice, the ability of [F3the Authority], in carrying out [F3its] functions by virtue of this Act, to make comparisons between different water enterprises shall be treated as a decision that the water merger has not prejudiced, or may be expected not to prejudice, that ability of [F3the Authority] if the decision is not that of at least two-thirds of the members of the group constituted in connection with the reference [F5under Schedule 4 to the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013] .]

Back to top

Options/Help