
Print Options
PrintThe Whole
Act
PrintThe Whole
Part
PrintThis
Cross Heading
only
Changes over time for: Cross Heading: Expert evidence as to subsequent behaviour of complainer


Timeline of Changes
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Version Superseded: 01/04/2019
Status:
Point in time view as at 28/03/2011.
Changes to legislation:
Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, Cross Heading: Expert evidence as to subsequent behaviour of complainer is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 04 March 2025. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations.

Changes to Legislation
Changes and effects yet to be applied by the editorial team are only applicable when viewing the latest version or prospective version of legislation. They are therefore not accessible when viewing legislation as at a specific point in time. To view the ‘Changes to Legislation’ information for this provision return to the latest version view using the options provided in the ‘What Version’ box above.
[Expert evidence as to subsequent behaviour of complainerS
275CExpert evidence as to subsequent behaviour of complainer in certain casesS
(1)This section applies in the case of proceedings in respect of any offence to which section 288C of this Act applies.
(2)Expert psychological or psychiatric evidence relating to any subsequent behaviour or statement of the complainer is admissible for the purpose of rebutting any inference adverse to the complainer’s credibility or reliability as a witness which might otherwise be drawn from the behaviour or statement.
(3)In subsection (2) above—
“complainer” means the person against whom the offence to which the proceedings relate is alleged to have been committed,
“subsequent behaviour or statement” means any behaviour or statement subsequent to, and not forming part of the acts constituting, the offence to which the proceedings relate and which is not otherwise relevant to any fact in issue at the trial.
(4)This section does not affect the admissibility of any evidence which is admissible otherwise than by virtue of this section.]
Back to top