7For section 76 there shall be substituted the following sections—
(1)An allegation that a person subject to air-force law (“the accused”) has committed an offence against any provision of this Part of this Act shall be reported, in the form of a charge, to his commanding officer.
(2)A commanding officer shall investigate a charge reported to him under subsection (1) above.
(3)If, in the course of investigating a charge, the commanding officer considers it appropriate to do so, he may amend the charge or substitute another charge for it and treat the amended or substituted charge as if that charge had been reported to him under subsection (1) above.
(4)If, in the course of investigating a charge, it appears to the commanding officer that proceedings in respect of the matters to which the charge relates could be, and in the interests of the better administration of justice should be, taken against the accused otherwise than under this Act he may stay further proceedings with respect to the charge.
(5)After investigating a charge the commanding officer may, subject to subsection (6) below—
(a)dismiss the charge;
(b)refer the charge to higher authority; or
(c)deal summarily with the charge.
(6)The commanding officer may not deal summarily with a charge if—
(a)the accused is an officer or warrant officer; or
(b)the charge is not capable of being dealt with summarily.
(7)This section has effect subject to any power of the commanding officer under section 103A(1) below to direct that the charge be tried by a field general court-martial.
(1)Where a charge is referred to higher authority, the higher authority shall refer the case to the prosecuting authority unless he takes one of the steps mentioned in this section in relation to the charge.
(2)The higher authority may refer the charge back to the commanding officer of the accused with a direction to dismiss it or to stay all further proceedings in relation to it, and the commanding officer shall deal with the charge accordingly.
(3)If the charge is against a non-commissioned officer or airman and is capable of being dealt with summarily, the higher authority may refer it back to the commanding officer of the accused to be so dealt with.
(4)If the charge is against an officer below the rank of wing commander or a warrant officer and is capable of being dealt with summarily, the higher authority may refer it to the appropriate superior authority to be so dealt with.
(5)If the charge has been referred to the higher authority as a result of an election for court-martial trial, and that election has not been withdrawn with leave, he may not refer the charge back to the commanding officer of the accused, or (as the case may be) to the appropriate superior authority, to be dealt with summarily.
(6)This section has effect subject to any power of the higher authority under section 103A(1) below to direct that the charge be tried by a field general court-martial.
(1)This section applies where a charge is to be dealt with summarily by a commanding officer or appropriate superior authority.
(2)References in this Act to dealing summarily with a charge are references to the taking of the following action, namely, determining whether the charge is proved and, accordingly, either dismissing the charge or recording a finding that the charge has been proved and awarding punishment.
(3)If, before determining whether the charge is proved, he considers it appropriate to do so, the commanding officer or appropriate superior authority may amend the charge or substitute another charge for it and treat the amended or substituted charge as the charge to be dealt with summarily by him.
(4)If, before determining whether the charge is proved, he considers that it should not be dealt with summarily, the commanding officer or appropriate superior authority may refer the charge to higher authority.
(5)If he determines that the charge has been proved, the commanding officer or appropriate superior authority shall, before recording a finding that the charge has been proved, afford the accused an opportunity of electing court-martial trial.
(6)If the accused so elects, the commanding officer or appropriate superior authority shall refer the charge to higher authority with a view to the trial of the accused by court-martial.
(7)If the accused does not so elect, or so elects but subsequently withdraws his election with leave, the commanding officer or appropriate superior authority shall record a finding that the charge has been proved and award punishment accordingly.
(8)If a charge has been referred to higher authority as a result of an election for court-martial trial, and that election is withdrawn with leave, the higher authority shall—
(a)if the accused is an officer or warrant officer, refer the charge back to the appropriate superior authority;
(b)if the accused is a non-commissioned officer or airman, refer the charge back to the commanding officer of the accused,
for the appropriate superior authority or commanding officer to record a finding that the charge has been proved and award punishment accordingly.
(9)This section has effect subject to any power of the commanding officer or appropriate superior authority under section 103A(1) below to direct that the charge be tried by a field general court-martial.
(10)Nothing in this section or section 76A above shall be taken to prevent an officer from acting as both higher authority and appropriate superior authority in relation to a charge.
(1)This section applies where a commanding officer or appropriate superior authority records a finding that a charge against an accused has been proved.
(2)The commanding officer may award one or more of the following punishments—
(a)if the offender is an airman, detention for a period not exceeding 60 days;
(b)fine;
(c)if the offender is a non-commissioned officer, severe reprimand or reprimand;
(d)where the offence has occasioned any expense, loss or damage, stoppages;
(e)any minor punishment for the time being authorised by the Defence Council.
(3)The appropriate superior authority may award one or more of the following punishments—
(a)except in the case of a warrant officer, forfeiture of seniority for a specified term or otherwise;
(b)fine;
(c)severe reprimand or reprimand;
(d)where the offence has occasioned any expense, loss or damage, stoppages.
(4)The commanding officer may not award a fine or minor punishment for an offence for which he awards detention.
(5)The appropriate superior authority may not award a fine for an offence for which he awards forfeiture of seniority.
(6)Except in the case of an offence against section 70 of this Act, the amount of a fine shall not exceed the amount of the offender’s pay for twenty-eight days.
(7)In the case of an offence against section 70 of this Act where the corresponding civil offence is a summary offence, the amount of a fine shall not exceed—
(a)the amount of the offender’s pay for twenty-eight days; or
(b)(if less) the maximum amount of the fine which could be imposed by a civil court on summary conviction.
(8)In the case of an offence against section 70 of this Act where the corresponding civil offence is an indictable offence, the amount of a fine shall not exceed—
(a)the amount of the offender’s pay for twenty-eight days; or
(b)(if less) the maximum amount of the fine which could be imposed by a civil court on conviction on indictment.
(9)A day’s pay shall be taken, for the purposes of subsections (6) to (8) above, to be the gross pay that is, or would (apart from any forfeiture) be, issuable to the offender in respect of the day on which punishment is awarded in respect of the offence.
(10)If the offender is an acting warrant officer or non-commissioned officer, the commanding officer may, if he awards no other punishment or no other punishment except stoppages, order the offender—
(a)to revert to his permanent rank; or
(b)to assume an acting rank lower than that held by him but higher than his permanent rank.”