
Print Options
PrintThe Whole
Act
PrintThe Whole
Schedule
PrintThis
Cross Heading
only
Changes over time for: Cross Heading: No candidate with overall majority of first preference votes


Timeline of Changes
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Version Superseded: 13/03/2004
Status:
Point in time view as at 07/11/2002.
Changes to legislation:
Local Government Act 2000, Cross Heading: No candidate with overall majority of first preference votes is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 05 March 2025. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations.

Changes to Legislation
Changes and effects yet to be applied by the editorial team are only applicable when viewing the latest version or prospective version of legislation. They are therefore not accessible when viewing legislation as at a specific point in time. To view the ‘Changes to Legislation’ information for this provision return to the latest version view using the options provided in the ‘What Version’ box above.
No candidate with overall majority of first preference votesE+W
3(1)If none of the candidates to be the elected mayor receives more than half of all the first preference votes given in the election the following provisions of this paragraph are to have effect.E+W
(2)The two candidates who received the greatest number of first preference votes given in the election remain in the contest.
(3)If, by reason of an equality of first preference votes, three or more candidates are qualified to remain in the contest by virtue of sub-paragraph (2), all of them remain in the contest.
(4)The other candidates are eliminated from the contest.
(5)The number of second preference votes given in the election for each of the candidates remaining in the contest by voters who did not give their first preference vote to any of those candidates is to be ascertained.
(6)That number is to be added to the number of first preference votes given for that candidate, to give his total number of preference votes.
(7)The person who is to be returned as the elected mayor is that one of the candidates remaining in the contest who has the greatest total number of preference votes.
(8)If, by reason of an equality of total number of preference votes, two or more candidates remaining in the contest each have the greatest total number of preference votes, the returning officer is to decide by lots which of them is to be returned as the elected mayor.
Modifications etc. (not altering text)
Commencement Information
Back to top