Section 22: Payments for wayleaves
120.This section applies if a trader receives rent from a wayleave granted in respect of land on which a trade is carried on. It is based on section 120 of ICTA.
121.Rent received in respect of a wayleave is normally taxed as property income either by Chapter 2 of Part 3 of this Act (property businesses) or by section 344 (charge to tax on rent receivable for a UK electric-line wayleave). But if the rent is received in respect of land on which a trader carries on a trade and the trader receives no other rent in respect of the same land the rent, and any associated expenses, can be included in the calculation of the trade profits. See Change 5 in Annex 1.
122.Subsection (2) applies if the rent is received in respect of a UK electric-line wayleave. A taxpayer is not required to include the rent and expenses in the calculation of the trade profits.
123.Subsection (3) applies if the rent is received in respect of any other type of wayleave. A taxpayer is not required to include the rent and expenses in the calculation of the trade profits.
124.Subsection (4) defines “rent”. Section 120 of ICTA uses the definition of “rent” in section 119(3) of ICTA (rent etc. payable in connection with mines, quarries and similar concerns). Section 119 of ICTA is rewritten as Chapter 8 of Part 3 of this Act. The definition of rent in that Chapter and in this section must be the same. See the commentary on section 336 of this Act for a fuller description of the rewrite of the word “rent” in Chapter 8 of Part 3 of this Act.
125.Subsection (5) defines “wayleave”. Section 120 of ICTA uses the word “easement” as defined in section 119(3) of ICTA to describe the nature of the right for which the rent is paid. This section uses “wayleave” as that is how most of the payments covered by this section are usually described in practice. The definition of “easement” in section 119(3) of ICTA gives that word a meaning that is much wider than its usual legal meaning. See the comments of Uthwatt J at pages 329 and 330 of Mosley v George Wimpey Ltd (1945), 27 TC 314 CA.
126.The definition of “wayleave” preserves the generality of the words in section 119(3) of ICTA and includes a reference to the Scottish equivalent, “servitude”.
127.The definition has no territorial limitation. So the section covers services other than UK electric-line wayleaves.
