Section 366: Provisions which must be given priority over Part 4
1451.This section provides rules which determine which Part will take priority in the event of any overlap in the charging provisions. It is based on sections 18, 20 and 95 of ICTA, and section 9D of TMA.
1452.Subsection (1) ensures that, if any amount falls within a charge in Part 4 of this Act and the charge on trade profits, Chapter 2 of Part 2 of this Act will charge that amount as a trade receipt. This takes account of section 95 of ICTA which sets out the circumstances in which a distribution made by a UK resident company, or a payment which is representative of such a distribution is brought into account in calculating the profits of a trade.
1453.Section 95 of ICTA brings a distribution into account in calculating the trade profits if the recipient is a dealer in relation to that distribution. Subsection (1) instead focuses on the nature of the receipt. See Change 79 in Annex 1.
1454.Subsection (1) also reflects the decision to give effect to the Crown Option. See Change 66 in Annex 1.
1455.In the case of non schedular charges it is unlikely that there would be any overlap. But in theory it is possible that, for example, stock dividends (Chapter 5 of Part 4 of this Act) and gains from contracts for life assurance (Chapter 9 of Part 4 of this Act) may rank as trade receipts. Taxing such income under Chapter 2 of Part 2 of this Act accords with the policy and practice of taking trade receipts into account in calculating trade profits and not otherwise. See Change 66 in Annex 1.
1456.Subsection (2) ensures that, if any amount falls within a charge in Part 4 of this Act and the charge on a UK property business, Chapter 3 of Part 3 of this Act will charge that amount as a receipt of a UK property business. This reflects the priority of Schedule A over Schedule D and is based on section 18(1)(b) of ICTA and Schedule D Cases III(a) and VI.
1457.Section 95 of ICTA can have no application to property income and there is no overlap between the Schedule A and Schedule F. The rule that Schedule F takes priority over Schedule A has not therefore been reproduced.
1458.Similarly as there is no overlap between Schedule A and the non schedular charges in section 249 of ICTA (stock dividends rewritten in Chapter 5 of Part 4 of this Act) and section 421 of ICTA (release of loan to participator in a close company rewritten in Chapter 6 of Part 4 of this Act) there is no need to exclude these charges from this priority rule.
1459.Subsection (3) ensures that ITEPA takes priority over Part 4 of this Act except for the charging provisions in Chapter 3 of Part 4 of this Act (dividends etc. from UK resident companies) and Chapter 6 of Part 4 of this Act (release of loan to participator in a close company). This reflects the priority that ITEPA has over Schedule D in the source legislation. It is based on section 18(1)(b) of ICTA and Schedule D Cases III(a) and VI of ICTA.
1460.A new provision, section 716A, has been added to ITEPA (see paragraph 615 of Schedule 1 to this Act) which gives priority to Chapter 3 of Part 4 of this Act over charges in ITEPA. This takes account of the fact that Schedule F has priority over ITEPA in the source legislation. It is based on section 20(1) and (2) of ICTA.
1461.In the source legislation there is a potential charge under section 421 of ICTA (which is rewritten in Chapter 6 of Part 4 of this Act (release of loan to a participator in a close company)) and section 188 of ITEPA. Section 189 of ITEPA gives priority to section 421 of ICTA. Section 189 of ITEPA will continue to assign priority to the charge in Chapter 6 of Part 4 of this Act.
1462.Subsection (4) provides that an amount can be used in calculating a chargeable event gain under Chapter 9 of Part 4 (gains from contracts for life insurance etc.) although it may also be used in calculating income under another provision in this Act. This is because the calculation of gains under Chapter 9 of this Part uses different principles from those used in other charges. However, section 527 of this Act ensures that the gain calculated under Chapter 9 is reduced by the amount charged elsewhere, to avoid a double charge on the same amount.
