Section 600: Relief for expenses: patent income
2330.This section provides relief for certain expenditure in connection with patents. The section sets out the nature of the expenditure for which relief may be given under section 601. It is based on sections 526 and 528 of ICTA. The deduction is on the basis of expenses incurred. This relaxes any requirement in the source legislation that fees have to be paid before a deduction can be made.
2331.Subsection (2) defines “inventor’s expenses” for the purpose of this section. To the extent that relief is not given elsewhere (for example, as a deduction, where appropriate, in calculating trade profits) a claim may be made under this section for such expenses to be relieved against income from patents.
2332.The word “net” in “the net amount of any expenses” in section 526(2) of ICTA has not been reproduced. This word is superfluous having regard to subsection (6) of the section which contains a signpost to section 603 (contributions to expenditure).
2333.Subsection (3) defines “patent application and maintenance expenses” for the purposes of this section. Relief for such expenses is excluded from the scope of this section if the expenditure is incurred for the purposes of a trade carried on by the payer. This is because there is a similar provision in section 89 for trading expenses connected with patents.
2334.Subsection (5) excludes from the scope of this section expenditure for which relief is given elsewhere. Section 526(2) of ICTA applies this rule only to expenditure incurred by the inventor and now covered by subsection (1)(a) of this section. Section 526(2) of ICTA provides that relief could not be given more than once for expenditure incurred in devising an invention for which a patent has been granted. There is no such explicit double deduction prohibition in section 526(1) of ICTA which deals with expenditure incurred in the grant, extension etc of a patent. To avoid any possible confusion, however, the section prevents a double allowance in respect of all relevant expenditure. This makes clear the implicit rule that the legislation does not enable such expenses to be relieved twice.
2335.Subsection (6) contains a signpost to section 603 which deals with contributions to expenditure. This is necessary because section 532 of ICTA treats section 526 and 528 of ICTA as if those provisions had been contained in CAA.
