
Print Options
PrintThe Whole
Act
PrintThe Whole
Schedule
PrintThis
Section
only
Changes over time for: Paragraph 11


Timeline of Changes
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Status:
Point in time view as at 02/12/2019.
Changes to legislation:
Armed Forces Act 2006, Paragraph 11 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 04 March 2025. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations.

Changes to Legislation
Changes and effects yet to be applied by the editorial team are only applicable when viewing the latest version or prospective version of legislation. They are therefore not accessible when viewing legislation as at a specific point in time. To view the ‘Changes to Legislation’ information for this provision return to the latest version view using the options provided in the ‘What Version’ box above.
This section has no associated Explanatory Notes
11U.K.For section 13 (adjustment of sentence in case of conviction on two or more charges) substitute—
“13Power to re-sentence when some but not all convictions successfully appealed
(1)This section applies where—
(a)on a single occasion a person is sentenced by the Court Martial in respect of two or more offences; and
(b)the Appeal Court allow an appeal against conviction in respect of some but not all of the offences.
(2)The Court may in respect of any offence of which the appellant remains convicted pass, in substitution for the sentence passed by the Court Martial, any sentence that—
(a)they think appropriate; and
(b)is a sentence that the Court Martial had power to pass.
(3)But the Court may not exercise their powers under subsection (2) in such a way that the appellant's sentences (taken together) for all the offences of which he remains convicted are more severe than the sentences (taken together) passed on him by the Court Martial on the occasion mentioned in subsection (1)(a).
(4)The reference in subsection (3) to the sentences passed by the Court Martial includes those passed by that court in respect of offences as respects which appeals against conviction have been allowed.”
Back to top